Author: Arpita Sarkar
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
With increase in globalization more people are working under the corporate sector which has been amounted to a negative image as not being socially responsible to the environment as well as to the people it caters.
The idea of Corporate Social Responsibility, commonly known as CSR, has undergone a revolutionary shift at a global level, transforming from what was once a philanthropic aside to an essential and necessary component of business strategy. This is more specifically noted in India, where CSR has undergone a tremendous shift from being a voluntary practice by companies to being legislated as a binding requirement for certain companies. This revolutionary shift is a sign of an increasing realization and acceptance of the profound interdependence that exists between companies and society at large, recognizing that corporations have a substantial role to play in actively contributing to the welfare of the societies they operate in as well as “making efforts to minimize their negative impact on the environment.” This study seeks to explore and investigate the intricate legal framework of CSR in India, analysing in detail its history of development, key provisions that have been enacted, and the recent developments that are currently shaping the landscape of corporate responsibility in the country.
The path that India has traversed in the context of CSR has been one of a progressive policy towards legislation. While the practice of undertaking philanthropic activities by companies has an ancient history in India, it was only when formalization of CSR picked up a lot of steam with the enactment of Section 135 of the Companies Act in the year 2013[1], along with the accompanying Companies (CSR Policy) Rules, which came into effect in 2014. These pioneering provisions are a paradigm shift of immense magnitude, mandating companies that fall within the criteria to set aside a specified percentage of their profits towards activities that fall within the purview of CSR. This all-encompassing legal framework has not only been successful in legislating the practice of CSR but has also brought in a degree of structure and accountability in terms of corporate social expenditure, ensuring that companies fulfil their obligations in an efficient manner.
The hallmark of the Indian CSR model is the “2% rule,” [2]which obliges eligible companies to spend at least 2% of their average net profits of the previous three financial years on CSR activities. This provision has resulted in a spectacular increase in corporate social spending, channelling enormous resources towards a wide range of social and environmental causes. The legislation also mandates the setting up of a CSR Committee, comprising board members, to oversee the formulation and implementation of the CSR policy. This ensures that CSR does not remain a mere token effort but a strategic effort integrated into the company’s core business.
The scope of CSR activities under the Indian model is extensive, ranging from education, health, poverty alleviation, environment conservation, rural development, and many others. Schedule VII of the Companies Act provides a menu of permissible activities, allowing companies to choose initiatives that suit their business expertise and cater to immediate societal needs. This flexibility allows a diverse range of CSR interventions, tailored to meet local needs and complement national priorities[3].
However, the landscape of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India is far from stagnant or unchanging.The last few years have seen significant developments and overhauls in the current CSR policies and regulations, all aimed at reinforcing key features such as transparency, accountability, and, most importantly, the net effect of CSR spending in India. These significant developments include increased emphasis being given to the practice of impact assessment, the tightening of reporting guidelines to make them understandable, and a focused attempt to have CSR activities aligned with national agendas as well as the broader international Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
The current study shall examine these developments in some detail, critically examining the implications of such developments for organizations working in India’s complex and diverse market environment. It shall closely examine the evolving stakeholder expectations that CSR practices shall fulfil, the different challenges organizations face in implementing effective and meaningful CSR programs on the ground, and the critical role played by different stakeholders to ensure accountability without watering down the net effect of corporate social responsibility initiatives. Analysing the legal framework covering CSR, the recent developments introduced through amendments, as well as the broader context of CSR’s evolution in India, the current study aims to gain a complete overview of not just the current nature of corporate social responsibility but also its future trajectory in one of the world’s most fast-paced and ever-changing economies.
With the ongoing expansion of India’s corporate landscape, the role of CSR has transcended its basic legal requirements. Businesses increasingly see CSR as a way to gain a competitive edge, strengthen stakeholder trust, and integrate social responsibility with core business strategies. Companies committed to meaningful CSR often benefit from enhanced brand reputation, stronger customer loyalty, and increased employee satisfaction, showcasing the wide-ranging advantages of genuine corporate responsibility. Additionally, aligning CSR with sustainable practices is crucial for attracting investments from socially conscious stakeholders, particularly those guided by Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria.
This strategic approach reflects a shift from viewing CSR as a cost to recognizing it as a long-term investment in sustainable growth.[4] Despite these positive developments, implementing effective CSR initiatives poses challenges for many companies. Identifying impactful projects, measuring concrete outcomes, and overcoming bureaucratic obstacles can limit the overall success of CSR efforts. Moreover, scepticism exists around the authenticity of some CSR activities, with critics accusing companies of ‘greenwashing’ — creating an illusion of social responsibility without significant impact. Striking a balance between genuine responsibilitie and meeting compliance standards remains a complex issue. As India’s regulatory framework around CSR evolves, businesses must adapt to ensure their strategies are impactful, transparent, and aligned with both national and global development goals. The future of CSR in India is likely to see greater scrutiny, heightened accountability, and a stronger focus on outcome-driven initiatives that truly benefit society.
1.1 Overview of CSR
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has shifted from being an ancillary idea to a core pillar of contemporary business practice, revealing a sea change in corporations’ conception of their place in society. No longer has the domain of discrete acts of philanthropy, CSR has become an overarching structure that incorporates social and environmental factors into fundamental business planning. This change is fuelled by an increasingly sophisticated understanding that companies exist within a dynamic system of stakeholders such as employees, customers, communities, and the environment, and that their long-term prosperity is inseparable from the health of these stakeholders. The journey of CSR is one of increasing awareness and accountability. From the early days of charitable giving by industrialists to the contemporary emphasis on sustainable development, businesses have gradually embraced a broader understanding of their responsibilities. This evolution has been shaped by a confluence of factors, including social movements, regulatory pressures, technological advancements, and shifting consumer expectations. The rise of globalization, for instance, has amplified the impact of multinational corporations, necessitating a more responsible approach to supply chain management and international operations.
Today, “CSR encompasses a wide range of dimensions, from environmental stewardship and ethical labour practices to community engagement and transparent governance. International frameworks like the UN Global Compact and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide a roadmap for businesses to align their actions with global priorities, fostering a sense of shared responsibility for addressing societal challenges.” The integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors into investment decisions further underscores the importance of CSR, demonstrating that sustainable business practices are not only ethical but also economically sound.[5] This overview aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of CSR, exploring its historical roots, core principles, implementation strategies, and future trends. By examining the diverse facets of CSR, we can appreciate its transformative potential to create a more sustainable and equitable world, where businesses are not merely profit-driven entities but responsible and contributing members of society.
1.1.1 Foundations and Evolution
The bedrock of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) lies in its gradual and multifaceted evolution, a journey that has transformed it from sporadic acts of philanthropy to a deeply ingrained strategic imperative within modern business practices. Initially, the concept of businesses bearing social responsibilities was nebulous, often manifested through isolated acts of charity by wealthy industrialists, a practice rooted in personal ethics rather than formalized corporate policy. This early form of social responsibility, predominantly philanthropic, was reactive and discretionary, lacking the structured integration that characterizes contemporary CSR. The Industrial Revolution, while driving economic progress, also exposed the darker side of unfettered capitalism, marked by labour exploitation, environmental degradation, and widening social disparities. These issues prompted the emergence of early social reformers who advocated for improved working conditions and a greater sense of corporate accountability, laying the groundwork for the more structured CSR frameworks that would emerge later. However, these early initiatives were largely ad-hoc, lacking the systematic integration into core business operations that defines modern CSR.[6]
The mid-20th century witnessed a pivotal shift, marked by the formalization of CSR as a distinct concept. Howard Bowen’s seminal work, “Social Responsibilities of the Businessman” (1953), is widely regarded as a watershed moment, articulating the fundamental principle that businesses have a duty to consider the social consequences of their actions. This period saw a transition from a purely profit-driven ethos to a recognition of businesses’ broader societal roles, driven by growing public awareness of social and environmental issues. The social movements of the 1960s and 1970s, including the civil rights, environmental, and consumer rights movements, further amplified calls for corporate accountability. Stakeholder theory, championed by Edward Freeman, emerged during this era, challenging the traditional shareholder-centric view and emphasizing the importance of considering the interests of all stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and communities. This broadened perspective acknowledged that businesses operate within a complex web of relationships, necessitating a more inclusive and responsible approach.
The late 20th century saw the rise of strategic CSR, as businesses began to recognize the potential for social and environmental responsibility to create competitive advantage. Globalization, the increasing interconnectedness of global economies, and the rise of multinational corporations further underscored the need for businesses to adopt responsible practices across their supply chains. The concept of the “triple bottom line,” encompassing economic, social, and environmental performance, gained traction, encouraging businesses to consider their impact on people, planet, and profit. Sustainability reporting frameworks, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), emerged, providing guidelines for companies to measure and disclose their social and environmental performance, fostering greater transparency and accountability. The 21st century has witnessed the culmination of these trends, with CSR becoming deeply integrated into core business strategies. The UN Global Compact and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have provided global frameworks for businesses to align their operations with universal principles and contribute to sustainable development. The concept of “creating shared value” (CSV), articulated by Michael Porter and Mark Kramer, has further emphasized the potential for businesses to create economic value by addressing social needs, aligning business objectives with societal goals. The integration of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) factors into investment decisions has further incentivized companies to prioritize sustainability, recognizing its impact on long-term financial performance. This evolutionary journey, from isolated acts of charity to strategic integration, reflects a growing understanding that businesses are not isolated entities but integral components of a complex, interconnected world, with responsibilities extending beyond profit maximization to encompass the well-being of society and the environment.
1.1.2 Core Principles and Frameworks
The core principles and frameworks underpinning Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) serve as the ethical and operational compass guiding businesses towards sustainable and responsible practices. These principles are not static; rather, they are dynamic and evolving, reflecting the changing societal expectations and global challenges. At the heart of CSR lies the principle of ethical business practices, emphasizing integrity, transparency, and accountability in all aspects of corporate operations. This principle necessitates adherence to high standards of conduct, encompassing fair competition, anti-corruption measures, and respect for human rights. Ethical conduct is not merely a matter of compliance; it is a fundamental value that permeates the organizational culture, influencing decision-making and stakeholder relationships. Sustainability, a cornerstone of modern CSR, “emphasizes the need to balance economic growth with environmental protection and social equity.”This principle recognizes that businesses operate within finite planetary boundaries and have a responsibility to minimize their environmental footprint and contribute to social well-being. Environmental sustainability involves reducing greenhouse gas emissions, conserving natural resources, and promoting circular economy practices. Social sustainability focuses on creating inclusive workplaces, promoting diversity and equity, and supporting community development. Economic sustainability ensures that business practices contribute to long-term economic growth and prosperity, while also addressing social and environmental concerns.
Transparency and accountability are essential for building trust and credibility with stakeholders. [7]Transparency involves open communication about corporate policies, practices, and performance, while accountability entails taking responsibility for the impacts of business activities. These principles are crucial for fostering stakeholder engagement and ensuring that businesses are held accountable for their actions. Stakeholder engagement is a fundamental principle that recognizes the importance of building and maintaining positive relationships with a wide range of stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, communities, and NGOs.[8] This principle emphasizes the need to understand and address stakeholder concerns, collaborate on social and environmental initiatives, and create shared value. Human rights, a universal and inalienable set of rights, are integral to CSR. Businesses have a responsibility to respect and uphold human rights in all aspects of their operations, including labour practices, supply chain management, and community relations. This principle necessitates conducting human rights due diligence, addressing human rights risks, and providing remedies for human rights violations.
To operationalize these principles, various international frameworks have been developed to provide guidance and standards for CSR practices. The UN Global Compact, launched in 2000, is a voluntary initiative that encourages businesses to align their operations with ten universal principles in the areas of human rights, labour, environment, and anti-corruption. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), adopted by the United Nations in 2015, provide a global framework for addressing social, economic, and environmental challenges. Businesses are encouraged to align their strategies and operations with the SDGs, contributing to the achievement of global sustainability goals. ISO 26000, an international standard, provides guidance on social responsibility, outlining key principles and practices for businesses to adopt. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) provides a framework for sustainability reporting, enabling businesses to measure and disclose their environmental, social, and economic performance. These frameworks provide a common language and set of standards for CSR practices, facilitating comparison and benchmarking across industries and regions. By adhering to these core principles and frameworks, businesses can demonstrate their commitment to responsible and sustainable practices, build trust with stakeholders, and contribute to a more just and equitable world.
- Dimensions of CSR
The CSR dimensions cover a wide range of considerations, mirroring the complex influence of business activities on society and the environment.[9] The dimensions are not exclusive but are interrelated, constituting an integrated approach to ethical business practices. Environmental responsibility, one of the key dimensions, deals with the influence of business activities on nature. These involve reducing greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change, conserving nature through effective use and recycling, and pollution reduction through waste management and proper chemical handling. More companies are embracing sustainable business practices, including making a shift to renewable energy sources, the adoption of circular economy models, and investment in environmentally friendly technologies. Environmental stewardship is not only critical to the conservation of the planet but also to the long-term business resilience against climate-related threats. Social responsibility addresses the effect of business operations on individuals and communities. This aspect includes a broad set of considerations such as labour practices, human rights, community involvement, and diversity and inclusion. Fair labour practices include providing safe working conditions, living wages, and respecting the rights of workers to freedom of association and collective bargaining. Human rights due diligence is necessary to identify and manage human rights risks across the supply chain and operations. Community engagement includes giving back to local communities through philanthropy, volunteer programs, and partnerships with NGOs. Diversity and inclusion ensure equal opportunities for all employees, irrespective of their identity or background. Prioritizing social responsibility helps companies to make the world a more equitable and just place.
Economic accountability, hitherto directed towards maximizing profit, today encompasses ethical financial management, fair trade, and sustainable investment. Ethical financial management entails transparency in disclosure, prevention of corruption and bribery, and decent taxation. Fair trade practices guarantee that suppliers and producers get adequate remuneration for their products and services, ensuring sustainable livelihoods and poverty reduction. Responsible investment entails three factors: environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues in investment considerations, investing capital in sustainable and responsible businesses. Through economic responsibility, companies work towards sustainable economic development and growth. Ethics and corporate governance are crucial in the establishment of responsible business practices. Good corporate governance systems lead to accountability, transparency, and ethical decision-making. These comprise the existence of separate boards of directors, effective risk management mechanisms, and the establishment of codes of conduct encouraging ethical practice in the company. Ethics affects all functions of doing business and thus determines relations with employees, customers, suppliers, and society at large. Companies emphasizing corporate governance and ethics win stakeholders’ confidence and boost their reputation. Supply chain responsibility is fast being regarded as a central facet of CSR.[10] As global supply chains become increasingly connected and sophisticated, companies have an obligation to guarantee that their suppliers meet ethical and environmental standards. Companies do this by undertaking due diligence on suppliers, enacting supplier codes of conduct, and encouraging sustainable procurement practices. By dealing with supply chain responsibility, companies avoid exposure to risks concerning labour exploitation, degradation of the environment, and violations of human rights. These CSR dimensions, when embedded in core business strategies, allow businesses to generate shared value, leading to a more sustainable and equitable world.
1.1.4 Implementation and Management
Successful implementation and management of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are key to converting good intentions into concrete, positive contributions. It entails a structured and holistic process, including strategic planning, stakeholder interaction, measurement of performance, and ongoing improvement. The process starts with the formulation of an integrated CSR strategy that is consistent with the organization’s core values, business goals, and stakeholder expectations. This approach must be guided by an intensive materiality analysis, which determines the greatest social and environmental concerns that impact the business and stakeholders. This analysis enables CSR activities to be prioritized and resources directed for maximum impact. Having unambiguous, quantifiable objectives and targets is crucial for monitoring progress and demonstrating accountability. These objectives must be SMART, that is, specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound, to allow the company to track its performance and correct accordingly. Making CSR a part of the fundamental business processes is crucial for it to thrive in the long term. This requires integrating CSR concepts into policies, procedures, and decision-making within all departments and functions.[11] From production and procurement to human resources and marketing, all functions of the business must demonstrate a focus on responsible practices.
Stakeholder engagement is a critical component of CSR implementation. This involves building and maintaining open and transparent communication with a wide range of stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, communities, and NGOs. Stakeholder dialogues, surveys, and partnerships provide valuable insights into stakeholder concerns and expectations, enabling the organization to address them proactively. Effective stakeholder engagement fosters trust, builds relationships, and enhances the organization’s reputation. CSR reporting and communication play a vital role in demonstrating transparency and accountability. Sustainability reports, based on frameworks such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), provide detailed information on the organization’s environmental, social, and economic performance. These reports should be accessible, accurate, and credible, enabling stakeholders to assess the organization’s progress and impact. Communication strategies should also include regular updates on CSR initiatives, success stories, and challenges, fostering a culture of openness and dialogue. Monitoring and evaluation are essential for measuring the effectiveness of CSR initiatives and identifying areas for improvement.
This includes gathering and analysing data on key performance indicators (KPIs), carrying out audits and assessments, and soliciting feedback from stakeholders. Performance data must be used to inform decision-making, improve strategies, and drive ongoing improvement. Having strong governance structures in place is essential for managing CSR implementation and holding people accountable. This entails delegating clear responsibilities, setting oversight mechanisms, and offering training and resources to employees. Leadership commitment is critical to influencing CSR across the organization. Top management must commit to CSR, communicate its value, and enable employees to be part of its success. Establishing a culture of CSR entails creating a shared sense of its value and infusing it into the values and practices of the organization. This entails offering training and education, rewarding and acknowledging good behaviour, and encouraging employee participation in CSR initiatives. Supply chain management is a vital component of CSR practice. Organizations must take their CSR practices to the suppliers, performing due diligence, adopting supplier codes of conduct, and encouraging sustainable sourcing practices. Partnerships and collaboration are needed to respond to challenging social and environmental issues. Collaboration with NGOs, government institutions, and other organizations can pool resources, knowledge, and networks, allowing the organization to have more impact. Through a systematic and integrated approach to CSR implementation and management, organizations can generate shared value, improve their reputation, and help create a more sustainable and equitable world.
1.1.5 Current Trends and Future Directions
The landscape of “Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)” is in a state of continuous evolution, shaped by emerging trends and forward-looking strategies that reflect the increasing urgency of global challenges and the growing sophistication of stakeholder expectations Current trends and future directions in CSR are characterized by a deeper integration of sustainability into core business models, a heightened focus on measurable impact, and the transformative potential of technology. One of the most prominent trends is the increasing alignment of CSR initiatives with the “Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).” Businesses are recognizing the SDGs as a comprehensive framework for addressing global challenges such as climate change, poverty, and inequality, and are integrating them into their strategies and reporting. This alignment not only demonstrates a commitment to global sustainability but also provides a clear roadmap for businesses to create shared value by addressing societal needs. The rise of “Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)” factors in investment decisions is another significant trend. Investors are increasingly recognizing the link between ESG performance and long-term financial sustainability, leading to a surge in demand for transparent and comparable ESG data. This trend is driving companies to improve their ESG reporting, adopt robust sustainability practices, and engage with investors on ESG issues. The development of standardized ESG reporting frameworks, such as those provided by “the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB),” is further enhancing transparency and comparability.[12]
The infusion of technology into CSR is revolutionizing the way companies manage and report on their sustainability performance. Internet platforms, analytics, and machine learning are allowing companies to capture, process, and report on their environmental and social footprint more accurately and efficiently. Block chain technology, for example, is being used for its ability to increase supply chain transparency and traceability, ensuring ethical supply and responsible production practices. The application of digital technology to engage stakeholders, for example, online polls and social media, is also making decision-making more participatory and inclusive. The theory of the circular economy is increasingly becoming popular as companies try to reduce waste and optimize resource utilization. [13]This practice entails product and service design with durability, recyclability, and reuse in mind, minimizing virgin material dependency and creating a closed-loop system. Firms are embracing circular economy thinking in their operations, supply chains, and product design, helping to create a more sustainable and resilient economy. Regenerative business is becoming a visionary approach to CSR, going beyond the conventional emphasis on reducing harm to actively restoring and enhancing ecosystems and communities. This strategy focuses on the interconnectedness of nature and business, urging businesses to invest in natural capital, support biodiversity, and participate in ecological restoration. Regenerative agriculture, for instance, is increasingly regarded as a sustainable agricultural practice that improves soil health, sequesters carbon, and sustains local communities.
Employee activism is becoming a powerful force in shaping corporate sustainability agendas. Employees are increasingly demanding that their employers take a stance on social and environmental issues, advocating for ethical business practices and sustainability initiatives. Companies are responding by fostering a culture of purpose-driven work, empowering employees to contribute to CSR initiatives, and providing opportunities for volunteerism and pro bono work. The increasing regulatory pressure from governments worldwide is also driving the adoption of more robust CSR practices. Governments are enacting legislation and regulations that mandate sustainability reporting, promote responsible supply chain management, and address climate change. “The European Union’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD),” for example, is requiring companies to disclose detailed information on their environmental and social performance. This trend is creating a level playing field for businesses and promoting greater transparency and accountability. The focus on social impact measurement is becoming more prevalent as stakeholders’ demand evidence of the effectiveness of CSR initiatives. Businesses are adopting impact measurement frameworks and methodologies to quantify the social and environmental benefits of their programs and demonstrate their contribution to sustainable development. This trend is fostering a data-driven approach to CSR, enabling companies to make informed decisions and optimize their impact. In essence, the future of CSR lies in its continued integration into core business strategies, a focus on measurable impact, and the leveraging of technology to drive transparency and accountability. As businesses increasingly recognize the interconnectedness of their operations with societal well-being and environmental sustainability, CSR will play a critical role in creating a more sustainable and equitable world.
1.2 Evolution of CSR
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been transformed from an off-centre idea to the central business mandate in the 21st century. It is more than just philanthropy, where businesses integrate their operations with social and environmental values. This overview will delve into the multifaceted nature of CSR, exploring its historical evolution, key principles, diverse dimensions, implementation strategies, benefits, challenges, and future trends. The evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reflects a profound shift in how businesses perceive their role in society. From early, sporadic acts of philanthropy to the contemporary integration of sustainability into core strategies, CSR has undergone a transformation driven by societal pressures, regulatory changes, and evolving ethical considerations.[14] Initially, businesses focused primarily on maximizing shareholder value, but growing awareness of environmental degradation, social inequality, and the interconnectedness of global economies compelled a broader stakeholder perspective.
1.2.1 The Seeds of Social Responsibility: Pre-Industrial Era to Early 20th Century
The nascent stages of social responsibility, predating the formal codification of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), were deeply embedded within the social, cultural, and economic structures of pre-industrial and early industrial societies. Long before the concept of corporations as we understand them today, ethical considerations and communal obligations shaped the actions of individuals and groups engaged in economic activities. Within pre-industrial societies, religious and cultural norms were paramount, dictating that individuals and communities had a responsibility to care for the less fortunate and contribute to the common good. Charitable acts, often motivated by religious doctrine, were seen as a moral imperative, fostering a sense of social cohesion and mutual support. In agrarian societies, survival depended on communal interdependence, where sharing resources and assisting those in need were essential for collective well-being. The medieval era witnessed the rise of guilds and craft associations, which regulated trade and ensured ethical conduct among their members.
These organizations operated on principles of fairness, quality, and community contribution, demonstrating an early form of self-regulation and responsibility towards both their members and the wider community. As the Industrial Revolution took hold, the landscape of social responsibility began to shift dramatically. The rapid expansion of factories and industrial processes created unprecedented wealth but also gave rise to significant social and environmental problems. [15]The exploitation of labour, particularly child labour, unsafe working conditions, and the degradation of the environment became glaring issues. In response, early social reformers emerged, advocating for better working conditions and fairer treatment of workers. Robert Owen, a pioneering figure, demonstrated that businesses could be both profitable and socially responsible by prioritizing worker welfare, education, and community development at his New Lanark mill. While some industrialists engaged in philanthropic activities, these were often viewed as isolated acts of charity rather than a systematic approach to social responsibility. The Progressive Era in the early 20th century marked a period of increased social awareness and reform. The rise of labour movements, consumer advocacy groups, and investigative journalism shed light on the social and environmental consequences of industrialization, leading to calls for greater corporate accountability.
Governments began to enact regulatory reforms, such as the Pure Food and Drug Act and the Sherman Antitrust Act, to address issues of public health and unfair business practices. Wealthy industrialists, like Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, contributed vast sums to philanthropic causes, funding libraries, universities, and other public institutions, though their business practices often remained controversial. Simultaneously, early concepts of welfare capitalism began to emerge, with some companies adopting practices to provide benefits such as housing, healthcare, and pensions to their employees, driven by a desire to improve employee morale and reduce labour unrest. This period, while lacking a unified framework for CSR, laid the crucial groundwork for future developments by highlighting the social and environmental impacts of business activities, demonstrating the importance of ethical conduct, and paving the way for regulatory reforms and social movements that would shape the evolution of CSR in the decades to come.[16]
1.2.2. The Emergence of Modern CSR (Mid-20th Century)
The mid-20th century was the turning point of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) evolution from sporadic episodes of philanthropy to a more codified and theory-based idea. It was the time when businesses became increasingly aware of the interdependence between business and society, driven by the post-World War II era, the emergence of social movements, and the growing power of academia. Howard Bowen’s “Social Responsibilities of the Businessman,” published in 1953, is commonly acknowledged as the cornerstone of contemporary CSR Bowen’s text enunciated the core doctrine that corporations do have a social responsibility to mind the social ramifications of their practices, going beyond the conventional doctrine of profit maximization as being the exclusive end of corporate endeavour. He contended that as companies expanded in size and power, their influence on society also grew, and thus, they needed a wider scope of understanding of their responsibilities. This change in mindset was not some abstract philosophical discourse; it was a reflection of the evolving socio-economic environment at the time when corporations were increasingly viewed as having the power to mold society either positively or negatively. The post-war period saw tremendous economic development and technological innovation but also introduced us to challenges in social justice, environmental decay, and the morality of corporate hegemony.
The 1960s and 1970s also accelerated the development of contemporary CSR, with social movements picking up pace and public awareness about social and environmental problems increasing. The civil rights movement, anti-war movement, and environmental movement gained traction on the notion of corporate responsibility, demanding increased accountability and openness. Ralph Nader’s consumer advocacy activities brought into focus the necessity of companies putting product safety and consumer protection at the top of their agenda, and Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring” sensitized people to the havoc industrial activities could unleash on the environment. These campaigns created an atmosphere of increased vigilance and public pressure that forced companies to act on their social and environmental footprints. The stakeholder theory, with its increased popularity during this time, offered a theoretical paradigm for understanding the various constituencies that companies had to take into account. Edward Freeman’s influential book, “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach” (1984), posited that companies have obligations to numerous constituencies, from employees and customers down through suppliers, communities, and the environment, as well as shareholders. This stakeholder-focused perspective replaced the dominant shareholder-focused model with a focus on the fact that long-term business success rested upon establishing and preserving good relationships with all stakeholders.[17]
Furthermore, the growing concern over environmental degradation led to the development of environmental regulations and the emergence of environmental management as a key aspect of CSR. The establishment of the “Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the United States” and the passage of landmark environmental legislation, such as the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act, reflected the increasing recognition of the need to protect the environment from the adverse impacts of industrial activities. Businesses began to recognize that environmental sustainability was not merely a matter of compliance but also a strategic imperative, as environmental performance became a key factor in their reputation and competitiveness.[18] During this period, the concept of the “social contract” between business and society gained traction, suggesting that businesses operate under an implicit agreement to contribute to the well-being of society in exchange for the right to conduct their operations. This understanding underscored the notion that businesses have a responsibility to act as good corporate citizens, contributing to the social and economic development of the communities in which they operate. The establishment of codes of conduct and ethical guidelines within corporations further solidified the commitment to responsible business practices, demonstrating a shift towards integrating ethical considerations into decision-making processes. The mid-20th century, therefore, laid the foundational principles for modern CSR, establishing the groundwork for future developments in sustainability, stakeholder engagement, and ethical business conduct. It was a period of critical reflection and transformation, where the role of businesses in society was redefined, and the concept of corporate responsibility was firmly established as a central tenet of business practice.
1.2.3. Strategic CSR and Globalization (Late 20th Century)
The post-war period saw a growth in economic expansion and technological change, but it also highlighted the concerns of social justice, ecological deterioration, and the moral ramifications of corporate power.
The late 20th century witnessed a remarkable turning point in the corporate landscape of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) with the rise of businesses adopting social and environmental factors as key components of their core operations, given their strategic importance. It was an era dominated by rising forces of globalization, multinational companies, and growing perceptions of interconnected economies. The concept of strategic CSR emerged, highlighting the potential for businesses to create both social and economic value through responsible practices. Companies began to understand that CSR was not merely a philanthropic endeavour but a strategic imperative that could enhance their reputation, build stakeholder trust, and contribute to long-term sustainability. Globalization, driven by advancements in technology and communication, expanded the reach and influence of multinational corporations, presenting both opportunities and challenges. While globalization facilitated economic growth and development, it also raised concerns about the impact of multinational corporations on developing countries, particularly regarding labour rights, environmental protection, and cultural preservation. The rise of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and increased media scrutiny further amplified these concerns, putting pressure on corporations to adopt more responsible business practices.
The vision of the “triple bottom line,” namely economic, social, and environmental performance, found favour at this time. Companies started understanding that sustainable development needed to consider the people, planet, and profit implications of their operations in a comprehensive way[19]. The change in the way of thinking resulted in creating sustainability reporting standards, like the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), which suggested guidelines for corporations to quantify and report their environmental and social performance. The advent of ethical supply chain management and sourcing gained ever-growing significance as businesses endeavoured to ascertain whether their suppliers implemented ethical and environmentally friendly standards. Certification programs, including Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and Fairtrade, offered means by which businesses could exhibit their allegiance to ethical practices of sourcing. The increasing recognition of environmental degradation and climate change further accelerated the adoption of environmental sustainability into business strategies. [20]Companies started implementing environmental management systems, like ISO 14001, to lessen their environmental footprint and enhance resource efficiency. The paradigm of eco-efficiency, which emphasized reducing resource use and waste production, also gained traction as companies endeavoured to decrease their environmental impact while at the same time enhancing their economic performance.
During this period, stakeholder engagement became a central aspect of strategic CSR. Companies recognized the importance of building and maintaining positive relationships with a wide range of stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, communities, and NGOs. Stakeholder dialogues and partnerships became increasingly common, providing platforms for companies to address stakeholder concerns and collaborate on social and environmental initiatives. The emergence of socially responsible investing (SRI) further highlighted the significance of CSR for financial performance. Investors started taking into account environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations while making investment decisions, as they realized that companies with good CSR performance were likely to perform better in the long run. This created a wave of ESG rating agencies and indices, which gave investors access to information about the sustainability performance of companies. The latter part of the 20th century, thus, saw a profound shift in the role and extent of CSR, as companies shifted from a reactive to a proactive strategy. Incorporation of social and environmental concerns into core business strategies turned into a strategic necessity, fuelled by globalization, stakeholder influences, and escalating awareness of the interdependence of business and society. The focus on the triple bottom line, ethical sourcing, stakeholder engagement, and socially responsible investing provided the foundation for the continued development of CSR in the 21st century, where sustainability and social impact have become the key to corporate success.
1.2.4. CSR in the 21st Century: Integration and Transformation
The 21st century has seen a deepened shift in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), from being a marginal issue to a core element of business strategy. The century is characterized by the extensive incorporation of sustainability values, the increased emphasis on quantifiable effect, and the utilization of technology to propel transparency and accountability. The idea of CSR has evolved beyond philanthropy or the avoidance of risk to that of a driver for innovation, competitive differentiation, and sustainable value creation.[21] The United Nations Global Compact, initiated in 2000, gave a working model to companies to base their operations on universal principles of human rights, labour, environment, and anti-corruption, indicating corporate commitment to ethical business practices worldwide. This move, followed by the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015, has greatly impacted corporate agendas, leading companies to respond to global issues and make contributions to sustainable development. The SDGs, with their inclusive framework of 17 goals and 169 targets, have given companies an unmistakable guide in embedding social and environmental factors into their strategy and operations and promoting a feeling of collective responsibility for global health.
The theory of “creating shared value” (CSV) by Michael Porter and Mark Kramer has further enhanced the mainstreaming of CSR in core business strategy. CSV underscores that businesses can generate economic value by fulfilling social needs and societal challenges, where business goals get aligned with society’s objectives. This has inspired companies to seek out avenues for innovation and create products and services that both make profits and solve social or environmental challenges. Increased recognition of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors in investment choices has also been an important driving force behind the integration of CSR. Investors are increasingly acknowledging that ESG performance is an important aspect of long-term financial viability and are including ESG factors in their investment portfolios. It has resulted in the creation of sound ESG reporting frameworks and rating agencies, and more transparency and accountability for business sustainability performance. The Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), and the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) are some of the well-known such frameworks, facilitating companies to report and measure their environmental and social footprint.[22]
Furthermore, technological advancements have played a crucial role in enhancing CSR practices. Digital platforms, social media, and data analytics have enabled businesses to engage with stakeholders more effectively, track their sustainability performance, and communicate their CSR initiatives transparently. Block chain technology, for instance, is being explored for its potential to enhance supply chain transparency and traceability, ensuring ethical sourcing and responsible production practices. The rise of employee activism has also reshaped the CSR landscape. Employees are increasingly demanding that their employers take a stance on social and environmental issues, advocating for ethical business practices and sustainability initiatives. Companies are responding by fostering a culture of purpose-driven work and empowering employees to contribute to CSR initiatives. The concept of regenerative business practices has gained traction, moving beyond the traditional focus on minimizing negative impacts to actively restoring and improving ecosystems and communities. This approach emphasizes the interconnectedness of business and nature, encouraging companies to adopt circular economy principles, invest in natural capital, and contribute to ecological restoration.
In addition, regulatory developments have further solidified the integration of CSR into mainstream business practices. Governments worldwide are enacting legislation and regulations that mandate sustainability reporting, promote responsible supply chain management, and address climate change. The European Union’s Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) and its successor, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), are examples of regulatory frameworks that require companies to disclose their environmental and social performance. The 21st century, therefore, represents a period of profound transformation in CSR, characterized by its integration into core business strategies, a focus on measurable impact, and the leveraging of technology to drive transparency and accountability. [23]As businesses increasingly recognize the interconnectedness of their operations with societal well-being and environmental sustainability, CSR has become a critical driver of long-term value creation and a key factor in building a sustainable and equitable future.
The evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) represents a significant paradigm shift in how businesses perceive their role within society.[24] From its nascent stages rooted in philanthropy and paternalism to its current integration as a strategic imperative, CSR has undergone a transformative journey. Initially viewed as a peripheral activity, often disconnected from core business operations, CSR has matured into a multifaceted framework that emphasizes stakeholder engagement, sustainability, and ethical conduct. This evolution reflects a growing recognition that businesses are not isolated entities but integral components of a complex, interconnected world. The transition from a shareholder-centric to a stakeholder-centric model marks a fundamental shift in corporate philosophy. Businesses now acknowledge their responsibilities extend beyond maximizing profits to encompass the well-being of employees, customers, communities, and the environment. This broader perspective has been driven by increasing societal expectations, regulatory pressures, and a growing awareness of the long-term risks associated with unsustainable practices.
Furthermore, the 21st century has witnessed the integration of sustainability as a central tenet of CSR. The adoption of frameworks like the UN Global Compact and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has provided businesses with a clear roadmap for aligning their operations with global sustainability objectives. The emphasis on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) factors in investment decisions has further incentivized companies to prioritize sustainability, recognizing its impact on long-term financial performance. Technological advancements have also played a crucial role in shaping the evolution of CSR. Digital platforms and data analytics have enhanced transparency and accountability, enabling stakeholders to monitor corporate behaviour and assess sustainability performance. Moreover, the rise of employee activism and consumer awareness has amplified the demand for ethical and responsible business practices.[25]
In essence, the evolution of CSR is a continuous process, reflecting the dynamic interplay between business and society. As global challenges such as climate change, social inequality, and resource scarcity intensify, the role of businesses in contributing to sustainable development becomes increasingly critical. The future of CSR lies in embedding ethical and sustainable practices into the core of business strategy, fostering a culture of shared value, and embracing innovation to create a positive impact on society and the environment.
1.3 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
The intended study aims to analyse the CSR structure in India comprehensively. This research intends to conduct in-depth examination of the historical, legislative and judicial purpose and process of corporate social responsibility. The study will review the current provisions and policies governing CSR and evaluate its strength and weaknesses.
The various research objectives are:
- To assess the clarity and comprehensiveness of the legal framework
- To examine the influence of mandatory CSR provisions on corporate behaviour
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the enforcement mechanisms
- To identify challenges and gaps in the current legal structure
1.4 HYPOTHESIS
The legislation in India regarding corporate social responsibility, recent amendments made to them and their mode of implementation is not adequate to combat the stressful workplace environment.
1.5 RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1.What is the importance of CSR in the corporate world?
2.What is the effectiveness of the current legal structure in promotion and implementation of CSR?
3.How other nations have contributed to the development and implementation of CSR at a global stage?
4.How have recent amendments to the CSR rules impacted the potential for CSR initiatives to mitigate workplace stress?
5.How can CSR strategies be optimized through effective recommendations and remedial measures?
1.6 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
To enhance the effectiveness of this study, the research undertaken will be doctrinal in nature. This approach involves gathering material from both primary and secondary sources, including various statutes, books by Indian and foreign authors, journal articles and other sources. The research will rely on existing facts and information to build a robust analysis. The study will employ an analytical method to examine legal provisions and implementation of CSR.By analysing legislative and judicial processes, the study will shed light on the evolution and effectiveness of Corporate social responsibility (CSR). Special attention will be given to the companies act 2013, as a significant legislative measure.
1.7SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS
The primary objective of this research is to offer a comprehensive and nuanced analysis of the legal framework that regulates Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India. By delving into the intricate network of laws and policies that shape CSR practices, this study aims to provide a thorough understanding of the evolving landscape of corporate responsibility in the country. Additionally, the research seeks to explore the impact of recent legislative and policy changes on CSR practices, assessing their implications in a broader socio-economic context.
1.7.1 SCOPE
This research primarily focuses on the legal framework that governs CSR activities in India, particularly examining the provisions under the Companies Act of 2013 and the accompanying Companies (CSR Policy) Rules of 2014. It investigates the mandatory requirements, eligibility criteria, and the legal obligations imposed on companies to engage in CSR initiatives. The study also reviews the key amendments and policy updates that have emerged in recent years, especially those related to impact assessments, expenditure tracking, and enhanced reporting standards. By critically analysing the legislative and regulatory landscape, the research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of these provisions in encouraging genuine corporate social responsibility. The study places a specific emphasis on listed companies due to their higher levels of public scrutiny, data transparency, and compliance with regulatory standards. Given the availability of accessible data and detailed reports, listed companies serve as valuable case studies to assess the implementation of CSR policies in practice. A qualitative approach has been adopted to analyse legal documents, policy papers, and corporate disclosures, providing an interpretative understanding of the regulatory framework. The research also attempts to consider state-level variations in CSR regulations and the distinctive socio-economic contexts of different regions. However, the study maintains a national perspective and does not extend to a detailed quantitative analysis of CSR spending patterns across various industries
1.7.2 LIMITATIONS
Despite the comprehensive nature of this research, there are certain limitations that should be acknowledged. The dynamic nature of CSR regulations in India, with frequent updates and amendments, may lead to the potential obsolescence of some parts of this analysis. Additionally, while the study focuses primarily on legal and policy frameworks, it may not sufficiently address the practical challenges faced by companies in implementing CSR projects on the ground. Issues such as identifying appropriate projects, measuring the tangible impact of CSR activities, and managing bureaucratic challenges at the grassroots level are complex and may not be thoroughly covered.
The lack of consistent and standardized data on CSR expenditures and the subjective interpretation of CSR compliance further constrain the scope of quantitative analysis. Moreover, while this research attempts to consider diverse stakeholder perspectives, including those of corporate entities, regulatory bodies, and civil society, it may not fully capture the varied experiences of all stakeholders. Establishing clear causal relationships between CSR efforts and actual social outcomes is challenging due to the complexity of measuring long-term impact. As a result, the findings of this study should be viewed within the context of these limitations, recognizing that the analysis primarily reflects a legal and policy-oriented perspective on CSR in India.
1.8 CHAPTERISATION SCHEME
Chapter-1 Introduction
This chapter lays the foundational framework for understanding Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) within the broader context of corporate governance and ethical business practices. It begins by exploring the origins and evolution of CSR, highlighting its transformation from philanthropic roots to a more structured and strategic approach integrated into business models. Core principles such as accountability, sustainability, stakeholder engagement, and ethical governance are outlined, along with a framework that guides CSR implementation and management across organizations. The chapter delves into the various dimensions of CSR—including economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities—and explains how companies operationalise these through structured policies and committee oversight.
Further, the evolution of CSR is traced historically, from early social obligations to modern strategic CSR shaped by globalization, stakeholder pressure, and regulatory reforms. The chapter introduces the key research objectives, hypotheses, and questions that guide the study. It outlines the qualitative methodology adopted for this research, focused on legal analysis and policy review, and discusses the scope—centred around the Indian legal framework under the Companies Act, 2013—while acknowledging the limitations such as regulatory dynamism, data subjectivity, and the complexity of impact assessment. Collectively, the chapter sets the stage for an in-depth exploration of CSR’s legal and practical dimensions in India
CHAPTER-2 NATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK
This chapter provides a detailed examination of the statutory framework governing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India, with a primary focus on Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, which legally mandates CSR obligations for certain companies. It begins by unpacking the concept of CSR as envisioned under this legislation, highlighting the foundational requirement for companies meeting specific financial thresholds to constitute a CSR Committee, which must include at least one independent director. The section further elaborates on the responsibilities of the Board of Directors in formulating, approving, and ensuring the implementation of CSR policies.
The chapter also analyses the eligibility criteria that determine which companies are required to comply with CSR obligations, outlining financial thresholds and qualifying metrics. It explains the range of permissible CSR activities as listed under law and how companies must select and execute them in alignment with national priorities.Further, it discusses the need for a clearly defined CSR policy, focusing on how such policies should be implemented and the mechanisms for reporting CSR expenditures and project outcomes in annual reports, thereby fostering transparency and accountability.
A key highlight of the chapter is the exploration of Schedule VII of the Companies Act, which provides the indicative list of activities that qualify as CSR. This includes domains such as education, health, environment, poverty alleviation, rural development, and more. The scope and flexibility of Schedule VII allow companies to align their CSR projects with both community needs and business strengths. The chapter concludes with illustrative case studies that demonstrate how companies have successfully aligned their CSR strategies with legal requirements, offering practical insights into implementation challenges and successes.
Chapter- 3INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS
This chapter explores the global foundations that have significantly influenced the development and evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) frameworks, focusing on key international conventions and agreements. It begins by examining the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) as the philosophical and ethical bedrock of modern CSR. The UDHR emphasizes fundamental human rights, equality, and dignity, which have become integral to CSR principles worldwide. The chapter also highlights the challenges in aligning CSR practices with UDHR mandates, particularly in diverse socio-economic contexts where enforcement and consistency remain issues.Next, it examines the ILO’s Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (MNE Declaration). This declaration provides comprehensive guidelines on responsible business conduct, advocating collaboration among governments, employers, and workers. It addresses employment, training, working conditions, and industrial relations. While the framework promotes balanced social development, the chapter acknowledges the challenges in achieving effective tripartite cooperation, particularly in countries with weak institutional mechanisms.
The chapter then discusses the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, a major international instrument offering voluntary principles and standards for responsible business conduct. It outlines the history of their adoption, their influence on shaping CSR standards, and how these guidelines serve as a benchmark for companies operating across borders. The guidelines encourage transparency, anti-corruption practices, human rights respect, and environmental protection.Lastly, the chapter connects CSR to the United Nations Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development, highlighting the growing intersection between corporate accountability and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It emphasizes that modern CSR initiatives are increasingly aligned with these global goals, focusing on eradicating poverty, promoting education, ensuring environmental sustainability, and fostering inclusive growth.
Chapter- 4RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
This chapter provides an in-depth analysis of the recent developments in India’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) framework, focusing on legislative amendments, alignment with national priorities, and implementation challenges. It begins by detailing significant key amendments that have shaped the CSR landscape in recent years. Special attention is given to the inclusion of government-driven initiatives such as the Clean Ganga Fund, the Swachh Bharat Kosh, and the PM CARES Fund as permissible avenues for CSR contributions. These inclusions reflect a strategic policy direction wherein CSR spending is increasingly being aligned with national development goals and public welfare priorities.The chapter then explores the obstacles and difficulties faced by companies in complying with CSR mandates. It notes that while the legal framework has become more structured, stringent laws and compliance norms have introduced complexities. Companies, particularly small and mid-sized enterprises, often face a compliance burden, exacerbated by bureaucratic procedures and unclear implementation guidelines. These hurdles can hinder the effective execution of CSR projects and reduce their impact at the grassroots level.
Moving forward, the chapter evaluates how CSR is now being steered to align with broader national priorities and sustainability objectives, particularly in light of India’s commitments to climate action, poverty reduction, and inclusive development. It highlights the increasing emphasis on sustainable and impact-driven CSR, where measurable outcomes and long-term community benefits are prioritized over one-time donations or symbolic gestures.Finally, the chapter reflects on the effectiveness and enforcement mechanisms currently in place. While stricter reporting requirements and impact assessments have improved transparency, there remain concerns about enforcement gaps and the actual social outcomes achieved. The chapter concludes that for CSR to be truly transformative, regulatory frameworks must be supported by flexible yet accountable implementation processes, continuous stakeholder engagement, and a commitment to sustainability at the core of business operations.
Chapter- 5 Conclusion and Suggestions
The study concludes that Corporate Social Responsibility in India has undergone a significant transformation—from voluntary philanthropic efforts to a structured, legally mandated framework under Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013. The integration of CSR into corporate governance marks a paradigm shift, emphasizing accountability, transparency, and sustainable development. The research finds that while India is a global pioneer in mandating CSR through legislation, the real challenge lies in effective implementation, ensuring that contributions create and long-lasting social impact.
chapter 2
national Legal framework
The national legal framework for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) marks a significant transformation in business regulation, shifting from voluntary principles to legally binding mandates. This change underscores the growing acknowledgment that corporations must actively contribute to the social and environmental well-being of the countries in which they operate. It also highlights the inadequacy of voluntary commitments in addressing critical societal and environmental challenges. These legal frameworks serve to formalize CSR obligations, ensuring that businesses adhere to fundamental ethical standards, environmental safeguards, and social responsibility principles.[26] Their implementation is often driven by factors such as heightened public awareness of corporate impacts, advocacy from civil society groups, and the necessity of aligning national policies with global sustainability objectives. By enforcing legal standards, governments aim to create an equitable business environment, preventing companies that prioritize short-term profits from gaining an unfair advantage over those investing in long-term sustainability. Clearly defined legal obligations encourage a culture of responsible business conduct, reinforcing transparency, accountability, and stakeholder participation.
The formulation of national CSR legal frameworks typically follows a multi-stakeholder approach, incorporating perspectives from businesses, government bodies, and civil society organizations. This collaborative process ensures that regulations are both practical and aligned with national priorities. The scope of these frameworks varies widely, covering aspects such as mandatory corporate reporting, environmental compliance, labour rights, and community engagement. While some regulations focus on specific industries, such as mining or manufacturing, others apply broadly to businesses exceeding a certain size or revenue threshold. Enforcement mechanisms often include regulatory agencies tasked with overseeing compliance and imposing penalties for non-adherence[27]. These agencies play a crucial role in ensuring that businesses uphold their legal responsibilities and that the intended objectives of the frameworks are met.
A key element of many national CSR legal frameworks is the emphasis on transparency and public disclosure. Mandatory reporting obligations require companies to disclose their environmental and social impact, allowing stakeholders to evaluate their performance and hold them accountable. Such disclosure standards frequently align with international benchmarks, including “the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)” and “the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB),” enabling consistency and comparability across industries and regions. Beyond reporting, some national CSR regulations impose direct environmental obligations, such as mandated reductions in carbon emissions, waste management policies, and biodiversity conservation efforts. These provisions aim to mitigate corporate environmental footprints and promote responsible resource usage.[28]
Another essential component of national CSR regulations is labour rights protection. Governments may require businesses to comply with labour laws, including minimum wage regulations, workplace safety standards, and prohibitions against forced and child labour. These measures safeguard workers’ rights and promote ethical labour practices across supply chains. Additionally, community development initiatives often feature in CSR legal frameworks, obligating businesses to invest in local communities, support infrastructure projects, or engage in philanthropic activities. Such efforts foster positive corporate-community relationships and contribute to local economic development.
The establishment of national CSR legal frameworks marks a pivotal shift toward embedding responsible business conduct into law. By introducing clear regulations and enforcement mechanisms, governments signal that CSR is no longer optional but a fundamental corporate duty. This legal evolution compels businesses to incorporate sustainability into their strategic operations, ultimately fostering a more sustainable and equitable global economy.
2.1 Analysis of Sec-135 of Companies Act, 2013
“Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013”, represents a watershed moment in the evolution of “corporate social responsibility (CSR”) in India. It transcends the traditional, often sporadic and discretionary, realm of philanthropy, transforming it into a structured, legally mandated obligation for qualifying corporate entities. This provision is not merely a suggestion or a guideline; it is a directive, a legislative intervention designed to ensure that businesses, which derive benefits from societal resources and infrastructure, contribute meaningfully to the nation’s socio-economic development.
2.1.1 THE CONCEPT
At its core, Section 135 embodies a fundamental shift in the relationship between corporations and society. It acknowledges the symbiotic nature of this relationship, recognizing that the success and sustainability of businesses are inextricably linked to the well-being and prosperity of the communities in which they operate. This section aims to institutionalize this understanding, embedding social responsibility into the very fabric of corporate governance.
The legislative purpose of Section 135 is two-pronged. First, it aims to leverage the enormous resources and capabilities of the corporate world to tackle key social and environmental issues that are hindering the country’s growth. Through the imposition of CSR, the government hopes to redirect corporate energies into areas like poverty reduction, education, healthcare, environmental protection, and rural development, thus supplementing the efforts of the government itself.[29]
Secondly, Section 135 aims to promote a more inclusive and sustainable growth paradigm. It recognizes that economic growth alone is insufficient and that it must be accompanied by social and environmental progress. By encouraging companies to adopt a broader perspective that encompasses social and environmental considerations, the provision seeks to foster a more equitable and responsible model of development.
Thirdly, the section aims to enhance corporate accountability and transparency. By requiring companies to disclose their CSR policies, activities, and expenditures, it promotes public scrutiny and encourages companies to maintain high standards of CSR performance. This transparency builds trust and strengthens the bond between corporations and their stakeholders, including employees, customers, investors, and the wider community.
One of the most important aspects of Section 135 is that it sets clear criteria for eligibility. These, determined by net worth, turnover, and net profit, guarantee that the CSR mandate is extended to those companies that have high economic capacity, that are able to make a considerable difference. Targeting these larger players, the provision ensures that CSR activity is proportionate to the magnitude of their business and their ability to contribute to social progress.
The need to have a Corporate Social Responsibility Committee is another essential feature of Section 135.[30] This committee, which consists of directors of the company, will be responsible for developing and recommending the CSR policy, sanctioning CSR expenses, and overseeing the execution of CSR projects. Having this committee guarantees that CSR projects are not random or haphazard but well-planned and well-executed.
The requirement of an expenditure of a minimum 2% of the average of net profits in the last three years on CSR-related activities is the hallmark of Section 135. This expense responsibility makes CSR activity a firm one rather than discretionary. Computing the same in terms of average net profits makes for a secure and reliable base of CSR expenditures and reduces year-on-year effects on profitability.
2.1.2 CSR committee with Independent Director(s)
The integration of independent directors into Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committees represents a significant stride towards bolstering corporate accountability and ensuring that CSR initiatives genuinely contribute to societal welfare. This practice, often mandated by regulatory frameworks, seeks to transform CSR from a potential public relations tool into a tangible driver of positive change. The core objective is to infuse objectivity and ethical rigor into CSR strategies, thereby mitigating the risk of decisions being swayed by short-term financial gains at the expense of long-term sustainability and social impact.
- The Foundational Role and Significance of a CSR Committee
A CSR Committee serves as the organizational nucleus for a company’s social and environmental endeavours. Its primary function extends beyond mere compliance, encompassing the strategic formulation and diligent oversight of CSR initiatives. This involves aligning CSR activities with the company’s core values, ensuring adherence to legal mandates, and fostering sustainable development. The committee is responsible for identifying and approving impactful social and environmental projects, meticulously managing budgets, rigorously monitoring implementation, and conducting thorough evaluations of project outcomes. [31]By performing these functions, the committee ensures that CSR efforts are not merely symbolic gestures but substantive contributions to societal well-being. The legal requirement for such committees, particularly for large corporations, underscores their importance in institutionalizing responsible business practices.
- The Pivotal Contribution of Independent Directors to CSR Governance
Independent directors, characterized by their lack of direct financial ties to the company, bring an invaluable perspective to CSR governance. Their presence injects impartiality and transparency into decision-making processes, ensuring that CSR initiatives are aligned with long-term sustainability goals rather than being driven by immediate commercial interests. These directors act as vigilant watchdogs, scrutinizing CSR expenditures, evaluating the efficacy of projects, and ensuring adherence to regulatory norms. Their ethical oversight is crucial in preventing the misuse or misallocation of CSR funds, thereby building trust among stakeholders. Moreover, independent directors contribute their diverse expertise, enriching the company’s CSR approach with insights from various industries, governance practices, and sustainability frameworks. This ensures that CSR initiatives are aligned with global best practices and deliver measurable social benefits.
- The Regulatory Landscape and Mandatory Inclusions
Governments worldwide are increasingly mandating the inclusion of independent directors in CSR Committees to enhance corporate governance and prevent malpractice. These regulatory requirements often specify the composition of the committee, ensuring a minimum number of independent directors to maintain objectivity. Mandatory disclosure requirements further strengthen this framework by compelling companies to publicly report their CSR activities, budgets, and outcomes. Independent directors play a critical role in verifying these disclosures, ensuring accuracy, and preventing “greenwashing,” where companies exaggerate or misrepresent their CSR contributions.
- Navigating the Challenges of Implementation
Despite the clear advantages, the integration of independent directors into CSR Committees presents several challenges. Potential conflicts of interest may arise between independent directors and company executives, particularly when CSR initiatives involve substantial financial commitments. Selecting qualified directors with the requisite expertise in CSR, sustainability, and governance can also be a complex task. Furthermore, resource constraints and inadequate reporting mechanisms can hinder the committee’s effectiveness. Companies must address these challenges by establishing clear guidelines, providing continuous training, and ensuring transparent reporting.[32]
- Best Practices for Maximizing Effectiveness
To maximize the effectiveness of CSR Committees with independent directors, companies should adopt best practices that promote accountability and transparency. These To ensure effective governance, a CSR committee’s charter should clearly define its mandate, authority, and responsibilities, distinguishing between its advisory function and management’s operational duties. Individual director contributions must be specified, leveraging their expertise in areas like sustainability or ethical sourcing, while robust decision-making processes, including voting protocols and conflict-of-interest guidelines, should be established to empower independent directors to challenge proposals and champion stakeholder interests.
2.1.3 functions of board of csr
The Board of a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee plays a crucial role in ensuring that a company’s social and environmental initiatives are well-aligned with its strategic vision, effectively executed, and generate tangible impact. Their responsibilities go beyond simple oversight, encompassing strategic direction, performance assessment, and stakeholder interaction. The board acts as a bridge between the company’s overall corporate strategy and its CSR commitments, integrating responsible business practices into core operations.
- Strategic Direction and Policy Development
A key function of the CSR Board is to guide the development and execution of CSR policies This requires close collaboration with management to define the company’s CSR vision, mission, and core values, translating them into practical policies and initiatives. The board ensures that CSR efforts align with the organization’s broader business objectives, identifying opportunities where social and environmental initiatives can create mutual value for both the company and its stakeholders. Additionally, they conduct materiality assessments to determine the most pressing CSR issues affecting the company and its stakeholders, ensuring resources are directed toward initiatives with the highest potential impact.
- Supervision of CSR Programs and Performance Evaluation
The CSR Board oversees the execution of CSR programs, monitors their progress, and assesses their effectiveness. This responsibility includes defining key performance indicators, tracking relevant metrics, and conducting periodic reviews to evaluate the impact of CSR initiatives. They ensure that these activities adhere to company policies and procedures while optimizing resource allocation for maximum efficiency. Furthermore, the board ensures that CSR performance is reported accurately and transparently to stakeholders, reinforcing accountability and openness.
- Risk Assessment and Regulatory Compliance
Another significant role of the CSR Board is to identify and mitigate CSR-related risks. This involves evaluating potential environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks associated with the company’s operations and supply chain while formulating strategies to minimize them. The board ensures adherence to applicable CSR regulations and global sustainability standards, conducting due diligence to prevent compliance breaches. Additionally, they oversee the establishment of ethical conduct guidelines and whistle-blower mechanisms, fostering a corporate culture of integrity and responsibility.[33]
- Stakeholder Engagement and Communication
The board achieves effective stakeholder engagement in CSR issues through dialogue with employees, customers, suppliers, the local community, and NGOs. They assimilate stakeholder input into CSR strategies to ensure that projects are applicable and useful for affected communities. The board is also responsible for ensuring CSR messages are transparent, accurate, and timely, and that they keep stakeholders abreast of the company’ssustainability initiatives. Strengthening relationships with main stakeholders is needed to build confidence and create lasting partnerships.[34]
- Budget Oversight and Resource Allocation
Another vital function of the CSR Board is overseeing CSR-related financial resources to ensure alignment with strategic priorities. This includes reviewing and approving CSR budgets, monitoring spending, and assessing the return on investment of CSR programs. The board ensures that initiatives receive adequate funding and that resources are used effectively to maximize positive social and environmental outcomes.
2.1.4. applicability to companies
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) regulations apply differently across various industries and business structures, depending on factors such as company size, revenue, profitability, and societal impact. While some companies voluntarily engage in CSR initiatives, many governments have established legal frameworks that make CSR compliance mandatory for specific types of businesses. The extent of CSR obligations is often based on a company’s financial standing, industry sector, and public influence. Below is an in-depth examination of the types of companies that are typically subject to CSR regulations.
1. Large Corporations and Multinational Enterprises (MNEs)
Large businesses and multinational enterprises (MNEs) often fall under mandatory CSR regulations due to their widespread operations, substantial financial resources, and considerable societal influence. These corporations are expected to address social and environmental concerns as part of their business strategies.
CSR Expectations for Large Corporations and MNEs:
- Allocating a portion of net profits to CSR initiatives, including education, healthcare, and sustainability projects.
- Reducing environmental impact by promoting energy efficiency and waste reduction.
- Upholding ethical labour practices across global supply chains, ensuring fair wages and safe working conditions.
- Publishing annual CSR reports in accordance with regulatory requirements and international sustainability frameworks.Governments and regulatory bodies impose CSR mandates on large corporations that exceed specific financial thresholds, ensuring their contributions toward sustainable development.
2. Publicly Traded Companies
Businesses listed on stock exchanges are frequently required to integrate CSR into their operations. Since these companies are publicly owned, they face higher expectations for transparency, ethical governance, and sustainability.[35]
CSR Compliance for Publicly Traded Companies:
- Disclosing CSR-related information through sustainability reports and financial statements.
- Complying with “Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)” reporting standards, such as the “Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)” or “Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB).”
- Implementing responsible investment strategies that prioritize ethical and sustainable business practices.
- Engaging in philanthropic activities and community development projects.
Investors and stakeholders demand accountability from publicly traded companies, making CSR compliance a key factor in maintaining a strong corporate reputation.
3. Financial Institutions and Banking Sector
Banks, insurance firms, and other financial entities play a crucial role in supporting sustainable economic growth. Many regulatory frameworks require financial institutions to incorporate CSR into their operations, particularly in the areas of ethical lending, responsible investment, and community development.
CSR Responsibilities of Financial Institutions:
- Offering financial support to projects that promote sustainability and social welfare.
- Conducting due diligence to ensure ethical investment and lending practices.
- Implementing financial inclusion programs to support small businesses and marginalized communities.
- Strengthening transparency and ethical governance within the financial sector.
By prioritizing CSR, financial institutions help foster long-term economic stability and social responsibility within the business landscape.
4. Industries with High Environmental and Social Impact
Businesses operating in resource-intensive industries—such as mining, oil and gas, construction, and manufacturing—are subject to stringent CSR regulations due to their potential for environmental harm and social disruption.[36]
CSR Requirements for High-Impact Industries:
- Complying with emissions regulations, waste management laws, and biodiversity conservation policies.
- Investing in renewable energy solutions and environmentally friendly technologies.
- Ensuring safe working conditions, fair wages, and ethical labour standards.
- Engaging with local communities to mitigate negative impacts and contribute to social welfare.
Governments impose strict CSR regulations on these industries to ensure that their operations do not harm the environment or exploit vulnerable populations.
5. State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and Government-Backed Companies
Public sector enterprises, especially those operating in key infrastructure and utility sectors, are expected to lead by example in CSR implementation. As government-backed entities, they must align their operations with national sustainability goals and public welfare objectives.
CSR Commitments for State-Owned Enterprises:
- Implementing environmentally conscious business strategies, including the utilization of renewable energy sources and waste reduction initiatives.
- Maintaining high standards of corporate governance and ethical transparency.
- Supporting social initiatives, including education, healthcare, and community development programs.
- Prioritizing employee welfare and fair labour practices.
Since state-owned companies operate in the public interest, they are held to high CSR standards and are expected to contribute to national development goals.
2.2 CSR Eligibility
CSR eligibility frameworks are fluid, adapting to shifting societal priorities and regulatory environments. As perceptions of sustainability concerns increase and regulatory systems tighten, eligibility criteria will likely broaden, reaching more corporations. This development reflects an interactive dialogue among businesses, governments, and civil society that defines the boundaries of corporate responsibility. The creation of explicit eligibility criteria is not an exercise in bureaucracy but a strategic necessity for creating a culture of responsible business practices. By establishing who should be contributing, governments are sending a strong signal that CSR is not an optional add-on but an embedded part of corporate governance. The strategy seeks to establish a competitive level playing field so that all qualifying corporations are subject to the same level of social and environmental performance, helping to foster a more sustainable and equitable business environment.
2.2.1 APPLICABILITY
The determination of which companies fall under the purview of Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, hinges upon a carefully delineated set of eligibility criteria.[37] These criteria serve as a crucial gatekeeping mechanism, ensuring that the mandate for corporate social responsibility (CSR) is applied to entities possessing the requisite financial capacity and societal influence. The primary objective is to target companies that, by virtue of their scale and economic footprint, are capable of making a tangible and significant contribution to social development.
The eligibility framework is structured around three core parameters: net worth, turnover, and net profit. This multi-pronged approach is designed to capture a diverse range of companies, irrespective of their specific business model or industry sector. By considering these three distinct financial indicators, the legislation aims to create a comprehensive and inclusive system that ensures that all eligible entities are brought within the ambit of CSR obligations.
More precisely, a business firm must act under Section 135 if, in the immediately previous financial year, it exceeds any one of the following limits: a net worth of ₹500 crore or above, a turnover of ₹1,000 crore or above, or a net profit of ₹5 crore or above.[38] These limits are not random figures; they constitute a well-balanced estimate of the financial standing needed to take effective and useful CSR activities.
The concept of “net worth” encompasses the total value of a company’s assets minus its liabilities. It provides a comprehensive measure of a company’s overall financial strength and stability. Companies with a substantial net worth are deemed to possess the financial resources necessary to engage in meaningful CSR activities.
“Turnover,” on the other hand, refers to the total revenue generated by a company from its sales or services.It serves as an indicator of a company’s scale of operations and its market presence. Companies with a high turnover are considered to have a significant economic footprint and, therefore, a greater responsibility to contribute to social development.
“Net profit” is the earnings of a company after deducting all the expenses, such as interest and taxes. It indicates the profitability of the company and its capacity to generate excess funds. Firms having a high net profit are considered to be having the financial resources to invest in CSR activities.
The use of the phrase “immediately preceding financial year” is crucial. It ensures that the eligibility criteria are based on the company’s most recent financial performance, reflecting its current economic capacity. This dynamic approach allows for flexibility, ensuring that companies that experience fluctuations in their financial performance are appropriately included or excluded from the CSR mandate.
The rationale behind these thresholds is rooted in the principle of proportionality. The legislation recognizes that companies with larger financial resources have a greater capacity to contribute to social development. By focusing on these larger entities, the law ensures that CSR efforts are commensurate with the scale of their operations and their potential impact. Furthermore, the eligibility criteria are designed to capture companies that have a significant impact on society. Large companies, by virtue of their scale of operations, have a greater potential to create both positive and negative externalities. By mandating CSR for these companies, the law aims to mitigate the negative impacts and enhance the positive contributions of their operations.
The clarity and objectivity of the eligibility criteria are crucial for ensuring compliance and avoiding ambiguity. By providing clear and measurable thresholds, the legislation establishes a predictable and transparent framework for CSR applicability. This reduces the scope for discretionary interpretations and ensures that all eligible companies are treated uniformly. However, the eligibility criteria also raise certain considerations. For instance, some argue that the thresholds may exclude smaller companies that, while not meeting the financial criteria, may still have a significant impact on their local communities[39]. There is also a discussion about whether certain types of companies, such as those in environmentally sensitive industries, should be subject to stricter CSR obligations, regardless of their financial performance.
Despite these considerations, the eligibility criteria under Section 135 have been instrumental in establishing a clear and consistent framework for CSR applicability. They have ensured that the CSR mandate is targeted towards companies with the financial capacity and societal influence to make a meaningful contribution to social development. The use of multiple parameters ensures a wider net is cast and includes a variety of business structures. A company that may not have a large net worth may still have a very high turnover, or be very profitable. This ensures that the spirit of the law, to include companies with a large societal impact, is upheld.
2.2.2 CSR ACTIVITIES
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) programs are multifaceted activities by companies to contribute to the welfare of society and the environment. CSR activities go beyond the conventional profit motive, demonstrating respect for ethical practice and sustainable development. CSR programs are not standardized; they differ with a company’s industry, size, and fundamental values, but tend to mitigate pressing social and environmental issues.
One prominent category of CSR activities involves environmental stewardship. Companies may implement programs to reduce their carbon footprint, conserve natural resources, or promote renewable energy. This can include investing in energy-efficient technologies, adopting sustainable waste management practices, or supporting reforestation projects. Such initiatives demonstrate a proactive approach to mitigating environmental degradation and fostering ecological balance.
Another significant area of CSR focus is community engagement. Businesses often contribute to local communities through philanthropic donations, volunteer programs, and partnerships with non-profit organizations. These activities may involve supporting education, healthcare, or poverty alleviation initiatives. By investing in community development, companies strengthen social infrastructure and build positive relationships with local stakeholders.[40]
In addition, ethical labour practices form the foundation of sustainable business practice. Organizations can adopt policies that provide fair compensation, secure working conditions, and respect for employees’ rights. This could be in the form of employee training and development, diversity, and inclusion or grievance mechanisms. By respecting the well-being of employees, businesses build a good work environment and increase their reputation as ethical employers.
CSR practices also include sustainable supply chain management. Businesses are now more closely examining their supply chains to guarantee ethical sourcing, fair trade, and environmental responsibility. This may include undertaking supplier audits, adopting codes of conduct, or promoting sustainable agriculture. Through responsible supply chain practices, businesses help create a more equitable and sustainable global economy.
Additionally, companies may engage in cause-related marketing, where they partner with non-profit organizations to raise awareness and funds for social or environmental causes. This can include donating a portion of sales to charity, sponsoring fundraising events, or launching public awareness campaigns.[41] By leveraging their marketing resources, businesses can amplify the impact of social initiatives and engage consumers in meaningful ways.
At its core, CSR activities are diversified initiatives that embody a firm’s dedication to building shared value. Through the incorporation of social and environmental factors into their business, companies ensure a sustainable and equitable future.
2.3 CSR Policy
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a fundamental principle that guides businesses in balancing economic success with social and environmental responsibility. As businesses continue to influence global and local economies, their role extends beyond profit generation to include sustainable development, ethical governance, and community well-being. A well-defined CSR policy provides a structured approach for organizations to integrate responsible business practices into their operations, ensuring long-term value creation for stakeholders, employees, and society at large.
A company’s CSR policy serves as a blueprint for aligning corporate values with sustainability goals. It outlines the organization’s commitment to ethical conduct, environmental stewardship, employee welfare, and social impact initiatives. This policy is designed to promote responsible corporate behaviour that contributes to inclusive growth, protects natural resources, and upholds human rights. CSR policies are shaped by regulatory requirements, industry best practices, and stakeholder expectations, ensuring that businesses operate with integrity while addressing broader societal challenges.
2.3.1 policy implementation
The articulation and implementation of a well-defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy stands as a pivotal element within the framework established by Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013.[42] This policy transcends the mere fulfilment of a legal requirement, evolving into a strategic document that guides a company’s commitment to social and environmental responsibility. It serves as a roadmap, delineating the organization’s vision, objectives, and strategies for contributing positively to society.
The creation of a robust CSR policy is not a solitary endeavour but a collaborative process that engages key stakeholders within the company. The CSR Committee, a body comprising directors of the company, plays a central role in this process. Their involvement ensures that the policy aligns with the company’s overarching business strategy and reflects a deep understanding of the social and environmental context in which the company operates.
A comprehensive CSR policy should begin by clearly articulating the company’s CSR vision and mission. This foundational statement should encapsulate the company’s commitment to social and environmental responsibility, setting the tone for all subsequent CSR initiatives. It should demonstrate a genuine intent to create positive and lasting impact, moving beyond mere compliance to embrace a proactive and transformative approach.
The policy should also delineate specific CSR objectives, which should be measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). These objectives should be aligned with the permissible activities outlined in Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013, ensuring that the company’s efforts contribute to national development priorities. By setting clear objectives, the policy provides a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of CSR initiatives and ensuring accountability.
One of the critical aspects of the CSR policy is the identification of priority areas for intervention. This process involves conducting a thorough assessment of the company’s social and environmental impact, as well as the needs of the communities in which it operates. This assessment should be informed by stakeholder consultations, ensuring that the policy reflects the perspectives and priorities of those who are directly affected by the company’s activities.
The policy should outline the company’s approach to implementing CSR projects, including the selection of implementing agencies, the monitoring and evaluation of projects, and the reporting of CSR activities[43]. It should define the roles and responsibilities of the CSR Committee, the management, and other stakeholders involved in CSR implementation. This clarity ensures that CSR initiatives are executed efficiently and effectively.
Furthermore, the CSR policy should address the principle of local area preference, as emphasized in Section 135. Companies are encouraged to prioritize CSR activities in the areas where they operate, fostering a sense of community ownership and addressing region-specific needs. The policy should outline how the company will identify and address the specific needs of these local communities, ensuring that CSR initiatives are relevant and impactful.
The policy should also integrate the principles of sustainability, recognizing the interconnectedness of economic, social, and environmental factors. This involves considering the long-term impact of CSR activities on the environment and society, as well as the integration of sustainability principles into the company’s core business operations. By adopting a holistic approach, the policy contributes to the creation of a more sustainable and equitable future.
Transparency and disclosure are essential components of a credible CSR policy. The policy should be made publicly available, either on the company’s website or in its annual report, allowing stakeholders to assess the company’s commitment to social and environmental responsibility. This transparency builds trust and fosters accountability, encouraging companies to maintain high standards of CSR performance.
The CSR policy should not be viewed as a static document but rather as a dynamic and evolving framework. It should be reviewed and updated periodically to reflect changes in the company’s business strategy, the social and environmental context, and stakeholder expectations. This iterative process ensures that the policy remains relevant and effective in driving positive change.
The process of developing a CSR policy should also include a consideration of risk management. By identifying potential social and environmental risks associated with the company’s operations, the policy can outline strategies for mitigating these risks and ensuring responsible business practices. A well-crafted CSR policy should be more than a set of guidelines; it should be a reflection of the company’s core values and its commitment to being a responsible corporate citizen. It should inspire employees, engage stakeholders, and contribute to the creation of a more sustainable and equitable society.
By embedding CSR principles into the organizational culture, the policy helps to create a shared understanding of the company’s social and environmental responsibilities. This fosters a sense of ownership and accountability among employees, encouraging them to actively participate in CSR initiatives.
2.3.2 csr reporting
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting is a necessary practice among organizations that practice sustainability, good governance, and social responsibility. CSR reporting provides a means of communication for corporations to report on their CSR actions, environmental track record, social contributions, and ethical business standards to stakeholders. CSR reporting improves corporate transparency in addition to reinforcing investor, customer, employee, regulatory agency, and community confidence. By recording their CSR activities, companies can prove their dedication to sustainability, monitor progress over time, and synchronize their strategies with global standards and regulatory frameworks.
The growing worldwide focus on sustainability has brought CSR reporting to widespread use as a key aspect of corporate governance. Numerous organizations are now legally obliged or persuaded through regulatory schemes to report their CSR activities and how they affect the economy, society, and environment. CSR reporting enables companies to systematically review their environmental impact, social responsibility activities, and governance. It offers a formalized framework for firms to quantify, manage, and enhance their sustainability performance in a manner that also aligns with stakeholders’ expectations.
2.4 Schedule VII
Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013”, serves as a pivotal and dynamic instrument within India’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) framework.[44] It functions as a comprehensive, yet adaptable, catalogue outlining the permissible domains within which companies can channel their CSR efforts.[45] This schedule transcends the mere listing of activities; it embodies the nation’s evolving socio-economic priorities, providing a structured yet flexible guide for corporations to contribute to national development.
2.4.1 INTRODUCTION TO SCHEDULE 7
The schedule’s significance lies in its ability to translate the abstract concept of CSR into concrete, actionable areas. It provides a clear and defined scope, ensuring that corporate contributions are directed towards initiatives that align with national goals. This clarity is crucial in fostering a consistent and impactful approach to CSR, preventing a scattershot approach where resources are dispersed without achieving substantial outcomes.
Schedule VII is not a static list carved in stone; it is a living document that undergoes periodic revisions to reflect the changing realities of the nation. This adaptability is essential in maintaining the schedule’s relevance and ensuring that CSR initiatives remain aligned with contemporary challenges. The inclusion of emerging areas, such as technology incubators and sports promotion, demonstrates the schedule’s responsiveness to evolving societal needs.
The breadth of activities encompassed within Schedule VII is noteworthy. It spans a wide spectrum of social and environmental concerns, ranging from fundamental needs like poverty alleviation and healthcare to more nuanced areas like environmental sustainability and skill development. This comprehensive scope allows companies to leverage their unique strengths and expertise, tailoring their CSR initiatives to areas where they can make the most significant impact. One of the cornerstones of Schedule VII is its focus on addressing basic human needs. Activities aimed at eradicating hunger, poverty, and malnutrition, as well as promoting healthcare, sanitation, and safe drinking water, are prioritized. This emphasis reflects the government’s commitment to ensuring that CSR initiatives contribute to the well-being of the most vulnerable segments of society. It underscores the understanding that social progress is contingent upon addressing these fundamental needs.
Additionally, Schedule VII puts strong emphasis on education and skills development. Educational activities involving encouragement of education, including special education and employment oriented vocational skills, are covered under it. It reflects the understanding that human capital development is at the centre of economic growth and social development. By investing in education and skill development, corporations help create a skilled labour pool, improve employability, and support inclusive growth.
Environmental sustainability is another critical area covered by Schedule VII. Activities related to environmental protection, conservation of natural resources, and promotion of ecological balance are included. This focus reflects the growing recognition of the interconnectedness between environmental health and social well-being. By engaging in environmental sustainability initiatives, companies contribute to mitigating the adverse impacts of their operations and promoting a more sustainable future.
The plan also gives prominence to rural development initiatives. This priority reflects the significance of targeting the specific concerns of rural populations, as these areas have specific infrastructure, education, and economic issues compared to urban ones. Through involvement in rural development activities, business entities help reduce the urban-rural gap and support inclusive development. The activities permissible under this category also include advocating gender equality, empowering women, establishing women and orphan homes and hostels, establishing old age homes, day care centres and other such facilities for senior citizens and steps to mitigate inequalities confronted by socially and economically backward sections. This speaks volumes about the government’s intentions to tackle social inequalities and encourage inclusive development.[46]Furthermore, Schedule VII encourages companies to engage in disaster relief and rehabilitation activities. This focus recognizes the importance of corporate support in responding to natural disasters and other emergencies. By providing assistance to affected communities, companies contribute to building resilience and fostering social solidarity.
The provision of contributions to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund or other funds established by the Central Government for relief and welfare of the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes, other backward classes, minorities and women reflects the government’s initiative to direct CSR funds towards national priorities. While Schedule VII provides a broad framework, it also allows for flexibility. Companies are encouraged to tailor their CSR initiatives to their specific strengths and the needs of their operating areas. This flexibility ensures that CSR initiatives are relevant and impactful. The ongoing evolution of Schedule VII underscores its dynamic nature and its ability to adapt to changing societal needs. By continuously refining the schedule, the government ensures that CSR initiatives remain aligned with national development priorities and contribute to creating a more equitable and sustainable society.
2.4.2 SCOPE UNDER SCHEDULE 7
The purpose of Schedule 7 is to ensure that CSR spending is channelled towards initiatives that genuinely enhance the well-being of communities and the environment. It moves beyond discretionary philanthropy, mandating that businesses invest in projects that create measurable social impact. This structured approach helps to avoid superficial or self-serving CSR activities, encouraging companies to engage in sustainable and meaningful interventions.[47]The schedule typically encompasses a broad range of sectors, including education, healthcare, poverty alleviation, environmental sustainability, and rural development. This comprehensive scope reflects the diverse needs of society and allows companies to select areas that align with their core competencies and values. By focusing on these key sectors, businesses can leverage their expertise and resources to create lasting positive change.
The schedule also encourages transparency and accountability through the need for companies to reveal information on their CSR expenditure and the effects of their activities.[48] This ensures that CSR money is spent effectively and businesses are held accountable for their environmental and social performance. By outlining a clear guide for CSR activities, Schedule 7 is important in encouraging corporate responsibility and pushing sustainable development.
- “Healthcare- This category of CSR includes eradication of poverty and malnutrition, hunger, making available safe drinking water, and promoting health care, including preventive health care and sanitation.
- Education and skill development- This category of CSR activities includes livelihood enhancement projects, promoting education, including special education and employment enhancing vocational skills, especially among children, women, elderly, and the differently abled.
- Gender equality and empowerment- This category of CSR activities includes empowering women, promoting gender equality, measures for reducing inequalities faced by socially and economically backward groups, setting up homes and hostels for women and orphans, and setting up old age homes, day-care centres and such other facilities for senior citizens.
- Environment- This category of CSR activity includes ensuring environmental sustainability, ecological balance, protection of flora and fauna, animal welfare, agroforestry, conservation of natural resources and maintaining the quality of soil, air and water.
- National heritage- This category of CSR includes protection of national heritage, art and culture, including restoration of buildings and sites of historical importance and works of art; setting up of public libraries; and the promotion and development of traditional arts and handicrafts[49].
- Armed forces- This category of CSR activities includes measures for the benefit of armed forces veterans, war widows and their dependents.
- Sports- This category of CSR activities includes training to promote rural sports, nationally recognized sports, Paralympic sports and Olympic sports.
- Relief fund-This category of CSR activities includes contributions made to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund or any other fund set up by the Central Government for socio-economic development and relief and welfare of the Scheduled Caste, the Scheduled Tribes, other backward classes, minorities and women.
- Rural development- This category of CSR activities includes all kinds of rural development projects, including infrastructure projects run for the benefit of those areas.
- Technology incubators-This category of CSR includes contributions or funds provided to technology incubators located within academic institutions that are approved by the Central Government.
- Slum area development- This category of CSR activities includes all initiatives taken for slum area development and all infrastructural projects that are started for the development of the slums.
- Swachh Bharat- This category of CSR activities includes all sorts of contributions to the Swachh Bharat Kosh set up by the Central Government for the promotion of sanitation and the Clean Ganga Fund (CGF) set up by the Central Government for rejuvenating the river Ganga.
- Disaster management- This category of CSR initiatives includes all activities that are done for disaster management, including relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction activities.”
2.4.3 CASE STUDIES
India’s corporate landscape showcases a variety of CSR efforts, with numerous companies exceeding legal mandates to drive substantial social change. [50]Here are some prominent examples:
1. The Tata Group: Long-Standing Dedication to Community Improvement
- Emphasis: The Tata Group has a rich history of philanthropic work, focusing on bolstering communities, healthcare, education, and rural development.
- Actions:
- Tata Trusts, their charitable arm, supports various programs, including rural development, healthcare for marginalized groups, and educational scholarships.
- Tata Steel’s rural development programs in Jharkhand and Odisha, aimed at enhancing livelihoods, infrastructure, and access to healthcare and education.
- Influence: Tata’s CSR is deeply rooted in their corporate values, showing a sustained dedication to social responsibility. Their work has significantly improved the lives of many in underprivileged areas.
2. Infosys Foundation: Fostering Empowerment through Education and Health
- Emphasis: The Infosys Foundation, under Sudha Murthy’s leadership, prioritizes enhancing education, healthcare, and rural development.
- Actions:
- Building schools and providing educational resources to disadvantaged children.
- Establishing hospitals and clinics, and supporting healthcare in rural regions.
- Rebuilding homes for those affected by natural disasters.
- Influence: The foundation’s work has significantly increased access to education and healthcare, especially in rural areas. Their approach is community-focused and emphasizes long-term sustainability.
3. Mahindra & Mahindra: Prioritizing Education and Skill Development
- Emphasis: Mahindra & Mahindra places a strong emphasis on education, skill development, and environmental sustainability.[51]
- Actions:
- Mahindra Pride Schools, which offer vocational training to disadvantaged youth, equipping them with job skills.
- The Hariyali initiative, which focuses on reforestation and ecological preservation.
- The Nanhi Kali project, which supports the education of girls from underprivileged backgrounds.
- Influence: Mahindra’s CSR programs have helped empower young people, promote ecological sustainability, and expand educational opportunities. Their focus on skill development helps bridge the gap between education and employment.
4. ITC: Promoting Sustainable Livelihoods and Rural Empowerment
- Emphasis: ITC prioritizes sustainable livelihoods, rural empowerment, and environmental conservation.
- Actions:
- The e-Choupal initiative, which empowers farmers with access to information, markets, and technology.
- Social forestry programs, which encourage sustainable forest management and enhance livelihoods.
- Watershed development programs, which focus on water conservation and rural advancement.
- Influence: ITC’s CSR efforts have greatly improved rural livelihoods, promoted sustainable farming, and protected natural resources. Their e-Choupal initiative demonstrates how technology can empower rural communities.[52]
5. Reliance Industries Limited: Advancing Healthcare and Rural Transformation
- Emphasis: Reliance Industries Limited focuses on improving healthcare, rural transformation, and providing aid during disasters.[53]
- Actions:
- The Reliance Foundation, which supports diverse programs, including healthcare, rural development, and disaster relief.
- Rural transformation programs, which enhance infrastructure, sanitation, and access to clean water.
- Providing disaster relief during natural disasters.
- Influence: The Reliance Foundation’s work has provided essential support to underserved populations, particularly during crises. Their rural development programs have improved living standards in rural areas.
CHAPTER 3
INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS
In an increasingly linked global system, where the activities of international companies easily cross country lines, the impact of commerce on both society and the natural world has become a major area of focus. The long-held idea that companies should only prioritize profits for their shareholders is gradually being replaced by a more comprehensive understanding of corporate accountability. This newer view recognizes the complex web of connections between businesses and their various stakeholders. This changing environment has led to the development of a wide range of international agreements, declarations, guidelines, and frameworks. These aim to influence how companies behave and to encourage a global culture of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). These international tools represent a joint effort by countries, global organizations, non-governmental groups, and even the business sector itself to establish a shared understanding of what constitutes responsible business conduct in today’s global economy.
The initial global attention to how companies operate began in the latter half of the 20th century. This period saw a growing awareness of the social and environmental consequences of industrial growth and increasing global trade. Early efforts often concentrated on specific areas, such as workplace standards and basic human rights. These were driven by worries about exploitation in worldwide supply chains and the role of corporations in maintaining inequalities. [54]The International Labour Organization (ILO), with its unique structure that includes governments, employers, and workers, was a pioneer in setting out fundamental principles and rights at work. Many of these have become essential to the CSR agenda. Agreements addressing issues like forced labour, child labour, discrimination, and the freedom to organize formed the basis for a worldwide understanding of minimum labour standards. Businesses are increasingly expected to uphold these, no matter where they operate.
As the reach and influence of multinational corporations grew, so did the realization that companies’ own voluntary efforts were not enough to tackle the many-sided challenges of globalization. Issues such as environmental damage, human rights violations in complex supply networks, and corruption required more coordinated and internationally recognized frameworks. The United Nations (UN) became a key platform for creating these frameworks. The UN Global Compact, initiated in 2000, is a significant milestone. It offers a set of ten principles derived from universally accepted declarations in the areas of human rights, labour practices, environmental protection, and the fight against corruption. Although not legally binding, the Global Compact has encouraged thousands of companies around the world to align their strategies and operations with these core principles. This has fostered a culture of corporate citizenship and encouraged the integration of CSR into essential business practices.
3.1 basis of International conventions
Building on this base, the UN further clarified the responsibilities of businesses with the adoption of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) in 2011. These principles, based on the “Protect, Respect and Remedy” framework, detail the specific duties and responsibilities of both governments and businesses in addressing human rights impacts. The UNGPs emphasize the government’s obligation to protect human rights, the corporate responsibility to respect human rights throughout their entire value chains, and the need for effective ways for those harmed by business-related human rights abuses to seek justice. They have become a widely acknowledged and influential framework, shaping national action plans, corporate policies, and the expectations of stakeholders regarding business and human rights.
Beyond the UN, other international organizations have also played vital roles in shaping the CSR landscape through their agreements and guidelines.[55]The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has developed the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. These are recommendations from governments to multinational companies operating in or from countries that adhere to the guidelines. These guidelines cover a broad spectrum of issues, including human rights, employment and industrial relations, environmental stewardship, combating bribery and corruption, consumer protection, advancements in science and technology, fair competition, and taxation. Regularly updated, the OECD Guidelines provide a comprehensive framework for responsible business conduct and are supported by a unique implementation system involving National Contact Points (NCPs). These NCPs can address complaints related to alleged failures to follow the guidelines. Furthermore, specific international agreements address particular aspects of CSR. For example, various environmental treaties, such as the Paris Agreement on climate change and conventions on biodiversity, indirectly influence corporate behaviour by setting global targets and creating a framework for national environmental laws that businesses must follow. Similarly, international agreements against corruption, such as the UN Convention against Corruption, establish legal obligations for countries to prevent and fight bribery, which is a critical element of ethical business conduct and good governance.
3.1.1 UDHR: foundation of CSR principles
At the core of the UNGPs lies a tripartite structure, articulated through three fundamental pillars, each delineating a distinct set of responsibilities and expectations. These pillars, when considered collectively, aim to establish a comprehensive system wherein human rights are respected, protected, and remedied across all aspects of business operations.
1. The State’s Duty to Protect Human Rights:
This pillar underscores the primary responsibility of states to safeguard human rights within their territories and jurisdictions. It recognizes that governments are the principal duty-bearers in the realm of human rights, holding the power to enact and enforce laws, regulations, and policies that ensure the protection of individuals and communities.[56]
- Legislative and Regulatory Frameworks:
States are expected to establish robust legal frameworks that explicitly mandate respect for human rights by businesses operating within their borders. This may entail the enactment of specific legislation addressing issues such as labour rights, environmental protection, and non-discrimination.Furthermore, states should ensure that their regulatory frameworks are effectively enforced, with mechanisms in place to monitor compliance and hold businesses accountable for any violations.
- Policy Coherence:
States must ensure that their policies across various sectors, including trade, investment, and development, are consistent with their human rights obligations. This requires a holistic approach to policymaking, wherein human rights considerations are integrated into all relevant areas.Governments must avoid policies that inadvertently incentivize or enable human rights abuses by businesses.
- Access to Justice:
States have a responsibility to provide access to effective judicial and non-judicial remedies for victims of business-related human rights abuses. This includes ensuring that legal systems are accessible, impartial, and capable of providing redress.States should also explore alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as national human rights institutions and ombudsman offices, to provide accessible avenues for redress.
- International Cooperation:
States should cooperate with each other to address transnational human rights challenges posed by businesses operating across borders. This may involve the development of international standards, the sharing of best practices, and the provision of mutual legal assistance. States must work to avoid creating “safe havens” where corporations can violate human rights with impunity.
2. The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights:
This pillar articulates the fundamental expectation that businesses, regardless of their size, sector, or ownership structure, have a responsibility to respect human rights. This responsibility is distinct from, and exists independently of, the state’s duty to protect.
- Due Diligence:
The UNGPs emphasize the importance of human rights due diligence, a proactive process through which businesses identify, prevent, mitigate, and account for their potential and actual adverse human rights impacts. [57]Due diligence should be an ongoing process, integrated into all aspects of business operations, including supply chains, investments, and customer relations.
- Policy Commitments:
Businesses should articulate their commitment to respecting human rights through clear and explicit policy statements. These policies should be communicated to all stakeholders, including employees, suppliers, customers, and communities. These policies should be informed by internationally recognized human rights standards.
- Integration:
Respect for human rights should be integrated into a corporation’s operational policies and procedures by embedding human rights principles into the core of its decision-making and actions[58].This involves establishing clear commitments in company policies, conducting human rights due diligence to identify and address potential impacts, and implementing processes to prevent and mitigate adverse effects.Furthermore, grievance mechanisms should be in place to address any human rights concerns effectively.Integrating human rights ensures ethical conduct, mitigates risks, and contributes to a sustainable and responsible business model
- Addressing Adverse Impacts:
When businesses identify that they have caused or contributed to adverse human rights impacts, they have a responsibility to provide for or cooperate in their remediation. This may involve providing compensation to victims, implementing corrective actions, or engaging in dialogue with affected stakeholders.
- Leverage:
When businesses have leverage to influence a business partner causing adverse human rights impacts, they should exercise that leverage to prevent or mitigate the harm. This responsibility stems from the understanding that businesses operate within a broader societal context and have a responsibility to respect human rights throughout their value chain, as outlined in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.
3. Access to Remedy:
This pillar focuses on the need to ensure that victims of business-related human rights abuses have access to effective remedies, both judicial and non-judicial.
- State-Based Judicial Mechanisms:
States should ensure that their legal systems provide accessible and effective remedies for victims of business-related human rights abuses. This includes removing barriers to access to justice, such as high legal costs and complex procedural requirements.
- State-Based Non-Judicial Mechanisms:
States should also establish or support non-judicial grievance mechanisms, such as national human rights institutions and ombudsman offices, to provide accessible and effective avenues for redress.[59]
- Operational-Level Grievance Mechanisms:
Businesses should establish their own operational-level grievance mechanisms to address complaints and provide remedies for adverse human rights impacts. These mechanisms should be accessible, transparent, and impartial. These mechanisms should not prevent access to state-based judicial mechanisms.
- Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives:
Multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs), bringing together businesses, governments, NGOs, and other stakeholders, offer significant potential for providing remedies for business-related human rights abuses. These platforms can establish accessible and impartial grievance mechanisms that complement state-based judicial and non-judicial systems. By involving diverse perspectives, MSIs can develop context-specific and culturally appropriate remedies, including compensation, restitution, rehabilitation, and guarantees of non-recurrence. They can also facilitate dialogue and mediation between affected parties and businesses, fostering reconciliation and trust-building. Furthermore, MSIs can play a crucial role in monitoring the implementation of remedies and ensuring accountability, contributing to more effective and sustainable redress for victims of corporate human rights violations.
- Human Rights Due Diligence: A Core Principle:
The UNGPs place a strong emphasis on human rights due diligence as a crucial tool for businesses to manage their human rights responsibilities. This process, which should be ongoing and iterative, involves:
- Identifying and Assessing Human Rights Risks:
Businesses have a fundamental responsibility to respect human rights, and a crucial first step in fulfilling this responsibility is to proactively identify and assess their potential and actual adverse human rights impacts across their entire value chain[60]. This process, known as human rights due diligence, is not a one-time exercise but an ongoing and iterative process. Identifying potential impacts involves anticipating how a business’s activities, products, and services could negatively affect human rights. This requires considering a broad range of rights, including civil and political rights, as well as economic, social, and cultural rights. It also necessitates looking at different stages of the business lifecycle, from sourcing raw materials and manufacturing to marketing, sales, and end-of-life disposal. Potential impacts can arise from a company’s own activities, as well as from the actions of its business partners, suppliers, and other entities within its value chain.
- Preventing and Mitigating Adverse Impacts:
Businesses should take appropriate measures to prevent and mitigate their adverse human rights impacts, including through policy changes, operational adjustments, and stakeholder engagement.
- Tracking and Monitoring Performance:
To ensure accountability and continuous improvement in their commitment to respecting human rights, businesses should establish robust systems to track and monitor their human rights performance across all aspects of their operations and value chains. This involves systematically collecting and analyzing relevant data to assess the effectiveness of their policies, procedures, and actions in preventing and mitigating adverse human rights impacts.
- Communicating on How Impacts are Addressed:
Businesses should be transparent about their human rights due diligence process, and how they are addressing the impacts they have caused.
The UNGPs are firmly rooted in the principles of the UDHR, which articulates the fundamental rights and freedoms to which all human beings are entitled.[61] By providing a practical framework for implementing the UDHR in the context of business, the UNGPs seek to ensure that these rights are respected and protected in all aspects of economic activity.
In conclusion, the UNGPs represent a landmark achievement in the global effort to promote corporate respect for human rights. By establishing clear expectations for states and businesses, and by emphasizing the importance of access to remedy, the UNGPs provide a roadmap for creating a more just and equitable business environment.
3.1.2 Challenges to UDHR-aligned CSR
The alignment of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) presents a complex landscape, riddled with challenges that hinder its effective realization. While the intent is to integrate human rights principles into business practices, the practical application often falls short, revealing significant gaps between aspiration and action.
- Implementation Discrepancies and Global Supply Chain Complexities:
A primary hurdle lies in the inconsistent implementation of UDHR-aligned CSR principles, particularly within the intricate web of global supply chains. Many businesses, while professing commitment to human rights, struggle to translate these ideals into tangible practices. This struggle is exacerbated by the diverse regulatory environments, cultural nuances, and varying levels of enforcement across different countries. Ensuring that all tiers of a supply chain adhere to UDHR standards requires rigorous due diligence, continuous monitoring, and effective grievance mechanisms. However, many companies lack the resources, expertise, or willingness to invest in these measures, leading to human rights violations slipping through the cracks. The challenge is amplified when subcontractors or third-party suppliers are involved, making it difficult to maintain oversight and accountability.
- Enforcement Limitations and the Non-Binding Nature of UNGPs:
The non-binding nature of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) further complicates the enforcement of UDHR-aligned CSR. While the UNGPs provide a comprehensive framework for businesses to respect human rights, their voluntary status means that companies are not legally obligated to comply. This lack of legal teeth can lead to inconsistent implementation, with some businesses prioritizing compliance while others engage in selective adherence or outright disregard. The absence of a robust enforcement mechanism weakens the effectiveness of UDHR-aligned CSR, allowing for a wide range of interpretations and practices. Consequently, stakeholders often find it challenging to hold businesses accountable for their human rights performance, hindering progress towards a more responsible and equitable business environment.
- Emerging Human Rights Issues and the Impact of Technological and Environmental Shifts:
The rapid pace of technological and environmental change introduces new and complex human rights challenges that require constant adaptation of CSR strategies.[62]Technological advancements, such as artificial intelligence, data analytics, and surveillance technologies, raise concerns about data privacy, freedom of expression, and algorithmic bias.Similarly, climate change poses significant threats to human rights, including the right to life, health, and adequate living standards. Businesses must proactively address these emerging issues by conducting thorough human rights impact assessments, engaging with stakeholders, and implementing robust mitigation measures. The ability to anticipate and respond to these evolving challenges is crucial for ensuring that UDHR-aligned CSR remains relevant and effective in the face of rapid change.
- Moving Beyond “Do No Harm” to Active Contributions:
A fundamental shift is needed in the approach to UDHR-aligned CSR, moving beyond the traditional “do not harm” paradigm to one that embraces active contributions to societal well-being.This requires businesses to recognize their role as agents of positive change, leveraging their resources and influence to address systemic human rights challenges. Companies must go beyond simply avoiding human rights violations in their own operations and supply chains; they must also actively contribute to creating a more just and equitable society. This can involve investing in community development projects, promoting human rights education, and advocating for policy reforms that advance human rights. Embracing this proactive approach requires a fundamental change in corporate culture, shifting from a focus on risk mitigation to a commitment to creating shared value and contributing to a more sustainable and equitable future.
The UDHR serves as a fundamental blueprint for CSR, providing a lasting framework for businesses to address their human rights responsibilities. By adhering to the UDHR and implementing the UNGPs, businesses can contribute to a more equitable and sustainable world. In an evolving global landscape, recognizing human rights is not just an ethical imperative but a necessity for long-term success. By centering human dignity, businesses can become catalysts for positive change, fostering a world where fundamental rights are universally realized.
3.2 MNE Declaration
Established in 1977 and subsequently updated, the International Labour Organization’s (ILO) Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social1 Policy (MNE Declaration) is a crucial guide for ethical corporate behaviour worldwide. Its distinctiveness lies in its consensus-based nature, developed through collaboration among governments, employers, and workers. This declaration offers multinational enterprises (MNEs) a framework to harmonize their international operations with fundamental principles of social fairness and basic human rights.
In an era where MNEs have an expanding global presence and influence, the MNE Declaration offers essential direction on how these significant economic actors can contribute positively to social and economic advancement while minimizing potential negative impacts. Unlike legally binding international agreements, the MNE Declaration functions as a set of non-compulsory principles and recommendations[63]. However, its authority is derived from the broad agreement it represents and its foundation in fundamental ILO Conventions and Recommendations, which often reflect widely accepted international labour standards and human rights norms. This non-binding quality allows for adaptable application across diverse national contexts and business sectors, making it a universally relevant instrument for promoting responsible business conduct.
The primary aim of the MNE Declaration is to foster the positive contributions that MNEs can make to economic and social progress and to reduce and resolve any difficulties that their various activities might create. It stresses the importance of aligning MNE operations with national development goals and social policies, while concurrently promoting decent work for all. The Declaration acknowledges that MNEs, with their considerable resources and global reach, have the potential to be strong catalysts for economic growth, job creation, and technological innovation. However, it also recognizes the potential for their activities to generate challenges related to labour standards, working conditions, industrial relations, and human rights if not managed responsibly.
The strength of the MNE Declaration resides in its comprehensive coverage of key areas related to employment and social policy. It offers guidance to MNEs, governments, and employers’ and workers’ organizations on a wide array of issues, including overarching policies, employment practices, equality of opportunity and treatment, job security, training initiatives, conditions of work and life, and industrial relations. The Declaration emphasizes principles such as respecting national laws, considering local practices, promoting social progress, ensuring non-discrimination, fostering fair employment conditions, upholding freedom of association and collective bargaining, and contributing to skill development. The tripartite nature of the MNE Declaration is central to its legitimacy and effectiveness, ensuring that it reflects the perspectives and concerns of governments, employers, and workers, thereby encouraging its voluntary adoption and implementation by MNEs as a guide for responsible and ethical business conduct in the global landscape. Through regular reviews and updates, the MNE Declaration remains a pertinent and contemporary resource for navigating the complexities of international business while upholding fundamental principles of social equity and human rights.
3.2.1 FRAMEWORK OF THE DECLARATION
While not legally binding, the MNE Declaration’s authority derives from its tripartite nature, symbolizing a collective understanding of responsible business practices among key stakeholders[64]. Its fundamental objective is to encourage MNEs to positively influence economic and social advancement, while simultaneously mitigating potential negative impacts associated with globalization.
The MNE Declaration addresses a broad spectrum of social policy areas, offering guidance across:
- General Operational Philosophy: Emphasis on adhering to national laws and regulations, respecting globally recognized standards, and contributing to sustainable development. Encouragement for MNEs to evaluate the socio-economic implications of their activities within host nations.Highlighting the importance of collaborative dialogues involving governments, employers, and employees.
- Workforce Engagement: Promotion of job creation and the eradication of discriminatory practices in employment.Advocacy for transparent and fair recruitment, including the elimination of forced and child labour.Emphasis on job stability and the provision of relevant training and skill development.
- Equity and Fair Treatment: Advocacy for equal treatment of all workers, irrespective of background.Necessity to eradicate disparities in compensation, working conditions, and career advancement.A focus on the protection of at risk populations.
- Job Security and Stability:Promotion of reasonable job security and collaborative consultations with worker representatives during significant operational changes.Advocacy for proper notice and severance packages during employment termination.Implementation of strategies to minimize negative consequences of restructuring.
- Skill Development and Education:Importance of providing training and skill-building opportunities throughout an employee’s career. Encouraging MNEs to invest in training initiatives that enhance employee employability and contribute to host country development.
- Workplace Environment and Living Standards:Promotion of safe and healthy working environments, including preventative measures against occupational hazards.Advocacy for fair remuneration and working hours, along with adequate social benefits. Consideration of housing and other employee welfare provisions.
- Labour Relations and Dialogue:Upholding the principles of freedom of association and the right to collective bargaining.Encouraging open communication with worker representatives and peaceful dispute resolution.Promoting the establishment of effective worker participation mechanisms.[65]
The MNE Declaration is intricately linked to the broader international human rights framework, building upon the foundations of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and other vital human rights instruments.
- Labour Rights as Fundamental Entitlements: Acknowledgment that labour rights are integral components of human rights.
- Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights Adherence: Implicit recognition of MNEs’ obligation to respect human rights throughout their operations.
- Synergy with the UN Guiding Principles: Complementary relationship with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs), which offer a more detailed roadmap for implementing corporate human rights responsibilities.
3.2.2 Tripartite Collaboration
Tripartite collaboration, at its essence, is a structured and formalized system of engagement that brings together the three primary pillars of the socio-economic landscape: the government, representing the public interest and regulatory authority[66]; employers, embodying the drivers of economic activity and job creation; and workers, through their representative organizations, voicing the needs and rights of the workforce. This isn’t merely a casual exchange of ideas, but rather a deliberate and often institutionalized process designed to foster mutual understanding, build consensus, and ultimately, forge effective solutions to complex challenges that permeate the world of work and the broader societal fabric. The power of this model lies in its inherent recognition that sustainable progress and equitable outcomes are best achieved not through unilateral action or the dominance of a single perspective, but through the synergistic interplay of these three distinct yet intrinsically linked groups.
The historical roots of tripartite collaboration are deeply embedded in the evolution of industrial relations and the burgeoning awareness of social justice issues in the early 20th century. The limitations and inherent conflicts arising from purely adversarial or top-down approaches to managing labour and economic affairs became increasingly apparent. This realization paved the way for the development of more inclusive and participatory frameworks, where the voices and interests of all key stakeholders could be heard and considered. The establishment of the International Labour Organization (ILO) in 1919 stands as a pivotal moment in this historical trajectory. The ILO’s unique tripartite structure, granting equal representation and voting power to governments, employers, and workers in its governing bodies and decision-making processes, enshrined the principle of tripartite collaboration as a cornerstone of international labour standards and social policy. This foundational commitment by the ILO has served as a powerful catalyst for the adoption and adaptation of tripartite models at national, regional, and sectorial levels across the globe.
The significance and enduring appeal of tripartite collaboration stem from a confluence of compelling advantages that contribute to more effective governance, a more stable and productive economy, and a more just and equitable society. Firstly, the involvement of all key stakeholders in the policy formulation process significantly enhances the legitimacy and effectiveness of resulting policies and regulations. When governments consult with employers and workers, the resulting measures are more likely to be grounded in practical realities, address the genuine concerns of all parties, and garner broader acceptance and compliance. [67]This collaborative approach helps to avoid the pitfalls of policies developed in isolation, which may be ill-informed, difficult to implement, or met with resistance from those most affected.
Secondly, tripartite mechanisms serve as crucial platforms for improving industrial relations and fostering constructive social dialogue. By providing regular and structured opportunities for employers and workers to engage in discussions, negotiations, and the resolution of grievances, these platforms help to build trust, reduce conflict, and promote a more harmonious and collaborative work environment. Effective social dialogue, facilitated by tripartite structures, can lead to mutually beneficial agreements on wages, working conditions, and other critical aspects of employment, contributing to workplace stability and enhanced productivity.[68]
Thirdly, tripartite collaboration cultivates a sense of shared responsibility and ownership for addressing economic and social challenges. When governments, employers, and workers are all actively involved in identifying problems, exploring potential solutions, and participating in the implementation of strategies, they are more likely to feel a vested interest in the outcomes. This shared ownership fosters a collective commitment to achieving common goals and enhances the sustainability and impact of any agreed-upon measures, as all parties are invested in their success.
Furthermore, the strength of tripartite collaboration lies in its ability to harness the diverse expertise and perspectives that each stakeholder group brings to the table. Governments offer a broad understanding of macroeconomic trends, social needs, and the legal framework. Employers provide practical insights into the realities of running businesses, navigating market dynamics, and fostering innovation. Workers’ organizations offer first-hand knowledge of the experiences, challenges, and aspirations of the workforce. The synthesis of these varied perspectives leads to more comprehensive, nuanced, and ultimately, more effective solutions that are better equipped to address the multifaceted nature of complex issues.
Moreover, tripartite collaboration plays a vital role in the promotion of social justice and equity. By providing a structured voice for workers and their representatives in policy discussions and decision-making processes, it ensures that their rights and interests are duly considered. This helps to mitigate power imbalances, reduce inequalities, and ensure that economic progress is inclusive and benefits all segments of society.The active participation of workers’ organizations in tripartite bodies strengthens their ability to advocate for fair labour standards, safe working conditions, and equitable treatment for their members.
Beyond its social and political benefits, tripartite collaboration also contributes significantly to enhanced economic competitiveness and productivity. Stable industrial relations, a skilled and motivated workforce, and a predictable and well-understood regulatory environment, all fostered by effective tripartite engagement, are crucial ingredients for a thriving economy. When employers and workers engage in constructive dialogue and find common ground on issues such as training, skills development, and workplace innovation, it leads to a more adaptable, productive, and competitive workforce and business sector.
Finally, established tripartite mechanisms can prove invaluable in crisis management and building societal resilience. During periods of economic downturn, social unrest, or other unforeseen challenges, the pre-existing channels of communication and the foundation of trust built through ongoing tripartite collaboration can facilitate rapid dialogue, the development of consensus-based responses, and the mitigation of negative impacts on employment and social well-being. The ability to quickly convene and engage all key stakeholders is essential for navigating turbulent times and fostering a collective sense of purpose in addressing shared threats.
The practical implementation of tripartite collaboration can manifest in a variety of institutional forms, tailored to specific national contexts and policy objectives. These may include formal national tripartite bodies tasked with advising governments on broad economic and social policy issues; sectorial tripartite committees focused on addressing the unique challenges and opportunities within specific industries; established collective bargaining forums for negotiations between employers and trade unions at various levels; joint consultative committees at the workplace level to foster dialogue between management and worker representatives; and formal processes for the participation of employers’ and workers’ organizations in the formulation of new legislation and regulations.
However, the successful and meaningful implementation of tripartite collaboration is not without its prerequisites.[69] It necessitates the existence of strong, independent, and representative employers’ organizations and trade unions that are capable of effectively articulating and advocating for the interests of their respective constituents. It also requires a genuine political will and commitment from governments to engage in meaningful consultations and to seriously consider the perspectives of the other social partners in their policy-making processes. A fundamental foundation of trust and mutual respect among the tripartite partners is essential, recognizing the legitimacy and value of each stakeholder’s contribution. Open and transparent communication, a willingness to share information, and a commitment to engaging in honest dialogue are also crucial. Furthermore, investing in capacity building for all tripartite partners ensures that they possess the necessary knowledge, skills, and resources to participate effectively in consultations and negotiations. [70]In the case of formal tripartite bodies, an independent and well-resourced secretariat can play a vital role in supporting their efficient and effective functioning.
In conclusion, tripartite collaboration represents a powerful and enduring model for achieving societal progress. By systematically bringing together the distinct yet interdependent perspectives of government, employers, and workers, it fosters a more inclusive, legitimate, and effective approach to addressing the complex economic, social, and labour-related challenges of our time. Its historical roots, its numerous benefits spanning policy effectiveness, industrial relations, social justice, and economic competitiveness, and its adaptability to various institutional forms underscore its enduring relevance in a rapidly changing world. While its successful implementation requires commitment, trust, and capacity from all involved, the potential rewards of a more equitable, prosperous, and resilient society make tripartite collaboration an indispensable tool for navigating the path forward.
The Multinational Enterprises (MNE) Declaration, a cornerstone of international labour standards, emphasizes the crucial role of tripartite collaboration in advancing Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).This collaborative approach, involving governments, employers, and workers, is essential for ensuring that MNEs operate in a manner that respects labour rights, promotes sustainable development, and contributes to the well-being of host countries. The MNE Declaration recognizes that effective CSR cannot be achieved through unilateral action; it requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders.
- The Significance of Tripartite Collaboration:
Tripartite collaboration, as advocated by the MNE Declaration, fosters a shared understanding of CSR principles and promotes their effective implementation. Governments play a crucial role in establishing legal frameworks, policies, and regulations that encourage responsible business conduct.They also provide oversight and enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with labour standards and human rights. Employers, as the primary actors in the workplace, are responsible for implementing CSR policies and practices within their operations. They must engage in social dialogue with workers and their representatives, ensuring that their concerns are addressed and that their rights are respected. Workers, through their trade unions and representative organizations, play a vital role in monitoring working conditions, advocating for their rights, and participating in decision-making processes that affect their lives.
- Enhancing CSR Implementation:
Tripartite collaboration enhances the effectiveness of CSR implementation by bringing together diverse perspectives and expertise. Governments contribute their policy-making and regulatory knowledge, employers provide insights into business operations and challenges, and workers bring their lived experiences and understanding of workplace realities. This collective wisdom ensures that CSR initiatives are practical, relevant, and aligned with the needs of all stakeholders. Social dialogue, a key component of tripartite collaboration, facilitates open communication and negotiation, leading to mutually beneficial solutions.It helps to build trust and understanding between employers and workers, reducing the likelihood of conflict and promoting harmonious industrial relations.
- Promoting Sustainable Development:
The MNE Declaration recognizes that CSR is not only about labour rights but also about promoting sustainable development. Tripartite collaboration is essential for addressing the complex social and environmental challenges that MNEs face. Governments can provide incentives and guidance for sustainable business practices, employers can invest in eco-friendly technologies and responsible resource management, and workers can advocate for safe and healthy working environments.[71] This collaborative approach ensures that economic growth is balanced with social equity and environmental protection.
- Ensuring Accountability and Transparency:
Tripartite collaboration enhances accountability and transparency in CSR practices. Governments can establish reporting requirements and disclosure mechanisms, employers can engage in stakeholder consultations and publish sustainability reports, and workers can monitor compliance with labour standards and report violations[72]. This collective oversight ensures that MNEs are held accountable for their social and environmental performance and that stakeholders have access to accurate and reliable information.
- Addressing Global Challenges:
The MNE Declaration emphasizes the importance of tripartite collaboration in addressing global challenges such as climate change, poverty, and inequality. Governments can collaborate on international agreements and policies, employers can invest in sustainable supply chains and responsible sourcing, and workers can advocate for fair wages and decent working conditions. This global partnership ensures that MNEs contribute to a more just and sustainable world.
In essence, the MNE Declaration’s emphasis on tripartite collaboration underscores the understanding that effective CSR requires a collective effort. By bringing together governments, employers, and workers, the declaration promotes a holistic and inclusive approach to responsible business conduct, ensuring that MNEs operate in a manner that benefits both their stakeholders and the broader society.
The MNE Declaration’s tripartite nature is a distinguishing factor, setting it apart from other corporate responsibility instruments.
- Diverse Perspectives: Representation of diverse viewpoints from governments, employers, and workers, ensuring a balanced approach.
- Enhanced Credibility: The involvement of key stakeholders lends legitimacy and credibility to the Declaration.
- Fostering Collaborative Dialogue: Promoting ongoing communication and cooperation between stakeholders, fostering a more harmonious work environment.
In today’s interconnected world, the MNE Declaration’s relevance persists. Global challenges, including inequality, precarious labour, and environmental degradation, necessitate responsible business conduct.
- Alignment with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Contribution to the achievement of SDGs, particularly those related to decent work and economic growth.
- Addressing the Future of Work: Providing a framework for navigating the social policy implications of technological advancements and evolving work patterns.
- Supply Chain Accountability: Emphasizing the importance of MNEs’ responsibility for ethical practices throughout their supply chains.
- The ILO’s MNE Declaration remains an essential tool for promoting responsible corporate behaviour in a globalized economy. Its unique tripartite framework, comprehensive scope, and connection to human rights make it a vital resource for all stakeholders. By adopting the principles of the MNE Declaration, MNEs can contribute to a more equitable and sustainable global economy.
3.2.3 CHALLENGES FACED
Despite the Multinational Enterprises (MNE) Declaration’s vital role in promoting responsible business conduct, its practical application is fraught with challenges that impede its widespread and consistent implementation. These hurdles stem from inherent limitations in its structure and the complexities of the global business environment.
- Challenges to Effective Implementation:
A significant obstacle is the voluntary nature of adherence. The MNE Declaration, lacking legally binding status, relies on the goodwill of MNEs to adopt its principles. This inherent weakness leads to inconsistencies, as some companies may selectively implement aspects of the declaration while others disregard it entirely. Without enforceable mandates, the declaration’s effectiveness is contingent on self-regulation, which can be unreliable.
The complexity of global supply chains further compounds implementation challenges. MNEs often operate [73]across numerous countries with intricate networks of suppliers, subcontractors, and distributors. Ensuring consistent compliance with the MNE Declaration throughout these sprawling networks is exceedingly difficult. Variations in labour practices, environmental standards, and ethical conduct among different suppliers create vulnerabilities that can undermine the declaration’s objectives. Effective due diligence and monitoring across such complex chains require substantial resources and expertise, which many companies may lack.[74]
Varied legal landscapes present another significant implementation hurdle. MNEs operate in diverse national contexts, each with its own set of laws, regulations, and enforcement mechanisms. These variations create a patchwork of legal requirements, making it challenging for MNEs to maintain uniform standards across their global operations. Differences in labour laws, environmental regulations, and corporate governance practices can lead to inconsistencies in implementation and create opportunities for companies to exploit regulatory loopholes.
The absence of a strong global monitoring system further weakens the MNE Declaration’s effectiveness. Without a centralized mechanism to track and verify compliance, it is difficult to assess the actual impact of the declaration. This lack of oversight allows for potential abuses and undermines the declaration’s credibility.
Solutions for Enhanced Implementation:
To address these challenges, several solutions can be implemented. Broadening awareness of the MNE Declaration is crucial. Increasing understanding among all stakeholders, including governments, employers, workers, and consumers, can foster a culture of compliance. Educational initiatives, workshops, and public campaigns can help disseminate information about the declaration and its principles.
Strengthening national efforts is essential for reinforcing the MNE Declaration. Governments should integrate its principles into domestic laws and policies, creating a legal framework that supports responsible business conduct. This can involve enacting legislation that mandates due diligence, reporting requirements, and stakeholder engagement.
MNEs should implement robust due diligence systems to prevent adverse impacts throughout their operations and supply chains. This involves conducting thorough risk assessments, developing codes of conduct, and establishing grievance mechanisms. Effective due diligence requires continuous monitoring, auditing, and collaboration with suppliers to ensure compliance with the MNE Declaration.[75]
Promoting open dialogue at national and enterprise levels is crucial for fostering understanding and collaboration. Governments, employers, and workers should engage in social dialogue to address implementation challenges, develop joint solutions, and build trust. This can involve establishing tripartite forums, conducting stakeholder consultations, and promoting collective bargaining.
Improved tracking and reporting systems are needed to enhance transparency and accountability. Developing standardized metrics, reporting templates, and audit procedures can facilitate the collection and analysis of data on MNE performance. This information can be used to track progress, identify areas for improvement, and hold companies accountable.
Sector-specific guidelines can help tailor the MNE Declaration to the unique challenges and opportunities of individual business sectors. These guidelines can provide practical guidance on implementing the declaration’s principles in specific contexts, addressing sector-specific risks and promoting best practices.
By implementing these solutions, stakeholders can strengthen the MNE Declaration’s effectiveness and ensure that MNEs contribute to a more just and sustainable global economy.
3.3 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for Multinational Companies
In today’s interconnected world, multinational corporations exert substantial influence, making their operational conduct a matter of global importance. “To cultivate a more sustainable and equitable economic landscape, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has established a set of recommendations known as the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct.”[76]These guidelines, supported by governments, serve as a compass for businesses operating across borders, aligning their actions with public policy and societal expectations. They provide a structured approach to responsible business practices, encompassing a broad spectrum of considerations vital for a sustainable global economy.
3.3.1 History of Adaptation
First introduced in 1976, the OECD Guidelines have undergone periodic revisions to remain relevant in the face of evolving global challenges. Notably, the 2023 update addressed contemporary issues such as climate change, the digital revolution, and the imperative of human rights due diligence. This adaptive nature reflects the OECD’s commitment to maintaining the guidelines as a practical and effective tool.
The guidelines address a diverse range of principles and standards, including:
- Upholding Human Rights: Businesses are expected to respect fundamental human rights, conducting thorough due diligence to identify, prevent, and mitigate potential adverse impacts on individuals and communities.
- Fair Employment Practices: The guidelines promote equitable employment conditions, including freedom of association, collective bargaining, and the elimination of discrimination, alongside a focus on workplace safety and constructive labour relations.[77]
- Environmental Stewardship: Businesses should conduct their operations with a focus on environmental responsibility, proactively addressing pollution, resource conservation, and climate change mitigation, with a strong emphasis on supply chain due diligence.
- Combating Corruption: The guidelines prohibit bribery and corrupt practices, emphasizing the implementation of robust anti-corruption compliance programs and due diligence on business partners.
- Consumer Protection: Businesses are expected to provide safe and reliable products and services, engage in transparent marketing practices, and protect consumer privacy.
- Transparency and Disclosure: Companies should disclose relevant information regarding their activities, financial performance, and responsible business conduct policies.
- Responsible Innovation: The guidelines encourage businesses to contribute to sustainable development through ethical and responsible technological advancements.
- Tax Integrity: Multinational enterprises are expected to adhere to the arm’s length principle and cooperate with tax authorities.[78]
To ensure the effective implementation of the OECD Guidelines, member governments establish National Contact Points (NCPs). These entities play a vital role in promoting the guidelines, providing guidance, and facilitating dialogue and dispute resolution.
3.3.2 Significance and Influence
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Guidelines for Multinational Enterprisesstand as a globally recognized and influential instrument for promoting responsible business conduct across a wide spectrum of corporate activities. Their significant weight and enduring relevance stem from a confluence of key factors, including the strong government backing they enjoy from the adhering countries, their comprehensive scope encompassing a broad range of business ethics and societal responsibilities, their fundamental emphasis on due diligence as a proactive approach to risk management, their strong promotion of stakeholder engagement as a cornerstone of responsible operations, and their extensive global reach, extending beyond OECD member states to encourage responsible behaviour by multinational enterprises (MNEs) worldwide.
The inherent strength derived from government backing provides the OECD Guidelines with a level of authority and legitimacy that distinguishes them from purely private sector initiatives. Adhering governments commit to promoting and implementing the Guidelines within their national contexts, often through National Contact Points (NCPs) that serve as crucial mechanisms for raising awareness, handling complaints, and facilitating dialogue. This governmental endorsement lends credibility to the Guidelines and encourages their adoption by MNEs operating within and beyond OECD jurisdictions.
Furthermore, the comprehensive scope of the OECD Guidelines ensures their relevance across a diverse range of business functions and societal impacts. They address critical areas such as human rights, labour relations, environmental protection, combating bribery and corruption, consumer interests, science and technology, competition, and taxation. This holistic approach recognizes that responsible business conduct is not limited to a single aspect of operations but rather permeates all facets of an enterprise’s activities and its interactions with the world around it. By providing a broad framework, the Guidelines offer a valuable point of reference for MNEs seeking to understand and manage their responsibilities in a comprehensive and integrated manner.
A central tenet of the OECD Guidelines is the emphasis on due diligence. This proactive and ongoing process encourages MNEs to identify, prevent, mitigate, and account for their potential and actual adverse impacts on human rights, the environment, and society throughout their value chains. The due diligence framework outlined in the Guidelines provides a structured approach for MNEs to assess risks, develop strategies to address them, and track the effectiveness of their actions. This focus on prevention and proactive management of risks is a cornerstone of responsible business conduct and helps MNEs to avoid or minimize negative consequences associated with their operations.[79]
The OECD Guidelines also strongly advocate for stakeholder engagement as an essential element of responsible business practice. They recognize that MNEs operate within complex ecosystems of stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, local communities, civil society organizations, and governments. Meaningful and ongoing dialogue with these stakeholders is crucial for understanding their concerns, identifying potential impacts, and developing effective strategies for addressing them. By fostering open communication and engagement, MNEs can build trust, enhance their social license to operate, and contribute to more sustainable and inclusive outcomes.
The global reach of the OECD Guidelines further amplifies their significance. While initially developed for MNEs based in OECD member countries, the Guidelines encourage responsible business conduct by all MNEs operating globally, regardless of their origin. This broad applicability makes them a valuable tool for promoting a level playing field and encouraging high standards of corporate behaviour across international borders. The NCP network, which extends beyond OECD members in some cases, further facilitates the dissemination and implementation of the Guidelines in diverse geographical contexts.[80]
Despite their considerable importance and influence, the OECD Guidelines are not without their challenges. One significant hurdle is their voluntary nature. While adhering governments commit to promoting the Guidelines, there are no legally binding mechanisms at the international level to enforce their implementation by MNEs. This voluntary aspect can lead to inconsistencies in adoption and implementation, with some MNEs embracing the Guidelines more comprehensively than others. The effectiveness of the Guidelines often relies on the willingness of MNEs to embrace their principles and the vigilance of stakeholders in holding them accountable.
Another challenge lies in implementation gaps. Even among MNEs that express commitment to the Guidelines, there can be significant variations in how effectively they are translated into concrete actions and integrated into daily operations. Factors such as a lack of awareness, insufficient resources, or a lack of clear internal accountability mechanisms can hinder effective implementation. Bridging these implementation gaps requires ongoing efforts to raise awareness, provide practical guidance, and encourage a strong internal culture of responsible business conduct within MNEs.
The complexity of global supply chains presents a further significant challenge to the effective application of the OECD Guidelines. Many MNEs operate through intricate networks of suppliers, subcontractors, and other business partners that span multiple countries. Ensuring responsible conduct throughout these complex value chains can be difficult due to issues such as a lack of transparency, varying legal and regulatory frameworks, and limited direct control over the actions of indirect business partners. Addressing human rights and environmental risks in global supply chains requires robust due diligence processes, effective supplier engagement strategies, and collaborative efforts across the value chain.
Finally, the OECD Guidelines face the ongoing need to adapt to a rapidly changing global landscape. New challenges and evolving societal expectations, such as the increasing urgency of addressing climate change, the growing importance of digital ethics, and the heightened focus on corporate accountability for human rights impacts, necessitate a continuous process of review and updating to ensure the Guidelines remain relevant and effective in guiding responsible business conduct in the 21st century.[81]
Recognizing these ongoing challenges, the OECD is actively engaged in efforts to further strengthen the Guidelines and enhance their impact. Key areas of focus for the future include enhanced guidance, providing more specific and practical advice to MNEs on how to implement the Guidelines in different sectors and contexts. This may involve developing sector-specific guidance, clarifying expectations on specific issues, and providing tools and resources to support effective due diligence and stakeholder engagement.
Increased transparency is another crucial area of focus. Encouraging MNEs to be more transparent about their policies, due diligence processes, and performance related to the issues covered by the Guidelines can enhance accountability and enable stakeholders to better assess their impact. This may involve promoting more robust reporting frameworks and encouraging greater disclosure of relevant information.
Strengthening the role of National Contact Points (NCPs) is also a key priority. NCPs play a vital role in promoting the Guidelines, handling specific instances where MNE conduct is alleged to be inconsistent with the Guidelines, and facilitating dialogue and conciliation between parties. Enhancing the effectiveness, independence, and accessibility of NCPs is crucial for ensuring that the Guidelines provide a meaningful avenue for addressing concerns and promoting accountability.
Finally, greater international collaboration is essential for maximizing the impact of the OECD Guidelines. [82]Working in partnership with other international organizations, governments in non-adhering countries, civil society organizations, and the business sector can help to promote a more consistent and coherent approach to responsible business conduct globally. This may involve sharing best practices, developing joint initiatives, and advocating for the integration of the principles of the Guidelines into other relevant international frameworks.
In essence, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises provide a crucial framework for promoting ethical and sustainable business practices in a globalized economy. They serve as a vital tool for fostering a more just and prosperous world by encouraging MNEs to act responsibly in their operations and contribute positively to the societies in which they operate. By emphasizing government backing, comprehensive scope, due diligence, stakeholder engagement, and global reach, the Guidelines provide a robust foundation for responsible business conduct. While challenges related to their voluntary nature, implementation gaps, the complexity of global supply chains, and the need for ongoing adaptation persist, the OECD’s commitment to strengthening the Guidelines through enhanced guidance, increased transparency, a strengthened role for NCPs, and greater international collaboration signals their continued importance and evolving relevance in shaping a more responsible and sustainable global economy. They represent a collective commitment by adhering governments to encourage and facilitate responsible behaviour by multinational enterprises, recognizing their significant influence on the global landscape and their potential to contribute to positive economic, social, and environmental outcomes when guided by strong ethical principles and a commitment to sustainability. The ongoing efforts to refine and promote the Guidelines underscore their enduring value as a cornerstone of international efforts to align business practices with broader societal goals.
3.4 Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development
In a pivotal moment of international cooperation, the United Nations’ 193 member nations, in September 2015, unanimously endorsed the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. This ambitious plan, structured around 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), outlines a collective aspiration for a more just, fair, and ecologically sound world. It’s a universal appeal, urging all countries, regardless of their developmental stage, to collaborate in addressing the critical issues facing humanity.[83]
- Deciphering the 2030 Agenda
The 2030 Agenda transcends a mere catalogue of objectives. It’s a holistic framework that acknowledges the interwoven nature of economic, social, and environmental elements in sustainable progress. It operates on the foundational principle of “leaving no one behind,” placing a strong emphasis on prioritizing the needs of the most vulnerable and marginalized groups.[84]
Key characteristics of the 2030 Agenda include
- Global Applicability: The SDGs are relevant to every nation, necessitating action from all.
- Interconnectedness: The goals are interdependent, meaning that advancement in one area fosters progress in others.
- Transformative Intent: The agenda seeks to redirect global development towards a sustainable and resilient trajectory.
- Collaborative Approach: Achieving the SDGs demands cooperative efforts from governments, businesses, civic organizations, and individuals.
The 17 Sustainable Development Goals
“At the core of the 2030 Agenda are its 17 SDGs, each with specific targets to be realized by 2030. These goals address a broad spectrum of vital concerns:
- Eradication of Poverty: Eliminating poverty in all its forms, globally.
- Zero Hunger: Ending hunger, ensuring food security and improved nutrition, and fostering sustainable agriculture.
- Universal Health and Well-being: Guaranteeing healthy lives and promoting well-being for everyone, at every stage of life.
- Inclusive Education: Securing inclusive and equitable quality education and promoting lifelong learning opportunities for all.
- Gender Parity: Achieving gender equality and empowering all women and girls.
- Water and Sanitation Access: Ensuring the availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for everyone.
- Renewable Energy: Securing access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all.
- Economic Opportunity: Promoting sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all.
- Infrastructure and Innovation: Building resilient infrastructure, fostering inclusive and sustainable industrialization, and stimulating innovation.
- Reducing Disparities: Diminishing inequality within and among nations.
- Sustainable Urbanization: Making cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable.
- Responsible Consumption: Ensuring sustainable consumption and production patterns.
- Climate Change Mitigation: Taking urgent action to combat climate change and its effects.
- Ocean Conservation: Conserving and sustainably utilizing oceans, seas, and marine resources for sustainable development.
- Terrestrial Ecosystems: Protecting, restoring, and promoting the sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, managing forests sustainably, combating desertification, and halting biodiversity loss.
- Peaceful and Just Societies: Promoting peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, providing access to justice for all, and building effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions.
- Global Partnerships: Strengthening the means of implementation and revitalizing the global partnership for sustainable development.”
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development stands as a pivotal blueprint for humanity, a comprehensive roadmap designed to address the interconnected crises facing our world. Its significance stems from its holistic approach to tackling global challenges, its emphasis on balanced progress, its call for international collaboration, and its aspirational vision for a better future.
- Addressing Intertwined Global Crises:
The 2030 Agenda provides a unified framework to confront the complex web of global issues, most notably poverty, inequality, and climate change. These challenges are not isolated; they are deeply intertwined, with each exacerbating the others. For example, climate change disproportionately affects vulnerable populations, exacerbating poverty and inequality. By addressing these issues in a coordinated manner, the 2030 Agenda recognizes the need for integrated solutions that consider the interconnectedness of social, economic, and environmental factors. It moves beyond soiled approaches, promoting a synergistic strategy where progress in one area reinforces progress in others.
- Promoting Harmonious and Balanced Advancement:
A key strength of the 2030 Agenda is its emphasis on balancing economic growth with social inclusion and environmental stewardship. It recognizes that sustainable development requires more than just economic prosperity; it demands a harmonious relationship between economic, social, and environmental dimensions. This balanced approach ensures that progress is equitable and inclusive, benefiting all segments of society while safeguarding the planet for future generations. It discourages short-sighted economic gains that come at the expense of social or environmental well-being, promoting a long-term perspective that prioritizes sustainability.
- Fostering Global Cooperation and Shared Objectives:
The 2030 Agenda is a testament to the power of international collaboration. It fosters cooperation among nations, international organizations, civil society groups, and the private sector to achieve shared objectives. By establishing a common framework and set of goals, it encourages collective action and mutual accountability. This collaborative spirit is essential for addressing global challenges that transcend national borders, such as climate change, pandemics, and economic inequality. It promotes a sense of shared responsibility and encourages countries to work together to find solutions that benefit all.
- Envisioning a Just, Equitable, and Sustainable World:
At its core, the 2030 Agenda offers a compelling vision for a better world. It envisions a future where poverty is eradicated, inequality is reduced, and the planet is protected. This vision inspires hope and motivates action, providing a moral compass for global development efforts[85]. It recognizes the inherent dignity and worth of every human being and emphasizes the importance of creating a world where everyone has the opportunity to thrive. By focusing on the needs of current and future generations, it promotes a sense of intergenerational responsibility and encourages sustainable practices that safeguard the planet for posterity.
- Navigating Persistent Challenges and Obstacles:
While the 2030 Agenda has garnered significant momentum, its implementation faces persistent challenges. Progress has been uneven across countries and sectors, with many nations struggling to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These challenges include:
- Financial Resource Mobilization: Securing adequate funding to implement the SDGs remains a major hurdle. Many countries, particularly developing nations, lack the financial resources to invest in sustainable development initiatives. Innovative financing mechanisms, public-private partnerships, and increased international aid are needed to bridge this gap.
- Data Collection and Monitoring: Enhancing data gathering and monitoring systems is crucial for tracking progress towards the SDGs. Many countries lack the capacity to collect accurate and timely data, hindering their ability to assess their performance and make informed decisions. Investing in data infrastructure, capacity building, and technological solutions is essential for improving data quality and availability.
- Sustaining Political Commitment: Maintaining consistent political dedication to the SDGs is essential for long-term success. Changes in government priorities, political instability, and competing demands can undermine progress. Strong leadership, policy coherence, and public engagement are needed to ensure that the SDGs remain a top priority.
- Addressing Global Disruptions: Global events, such as pandemics, conflicts, and economic crises, can significantly disrupt progress towards the SDGs.[86] Building resilience, strengthening social safety nets, and promoting international cooperation are essential for mitigating the impact of these disruptions.
- Driving Accelerated Progress Towards 2030:
Despite these obstacles, progress has been made in various areas. Nations are integrating the SDGs into their national development strategies, businesses are adopting sustainable practices, and civil society groups are advocating for change. To accelerate progress towards 2030, it is crucial to:
- Reinforce Global Partnerships: Strengthening collaboration among governments, international organizations, civil society, and the private sector is essential for leveraging resources and expertise.
- Increase Sustainable Development Investments: Scaling up investments in sustainable infrastructure, renewable energy, education, and healthcare is crucial for achieving the SDGs.
- Promote Innovation and Technology: Harnessing the power of innovation and technology can accelerate progress towards the SDGs by developing new solutions and improving efficiency.
- Empower Marginalized Groups: Ensuring that marginalized groups, including women, youth, and indigenous peoples, are fully included in development processes is essential for achieving equitable outcomes.
- Maintain Focus and Adapt to Global Changes: Staying focused on the SDGs and adapting to evolving global challenges is crucial for long-term success. Flexibility, resilience, and continuous learning are essential for navigating uncertainty and achieving the 2030 Agenda’s goals.
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is a powerful tool for building a better future. Through collective effort, determination, and unwavering commitment, we can overcome the challenges and achieve the SDGs, creating a more just, equitable, and sustainable world for all.
CONCLUSION
The global panorama of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) unveils a multifaceted and ever-evolving narrative of how businesses engage with the world beyond profit margins. It’s a journey from isolated, geographically-restricted initiatives to a cohesive, globally-aware strategy, spurred by interconnected economies and shared ecological and societal challenges. This worldwide perspective highlights the realization that CSR is no longer a matter of local concern, but a transnational imperative demanding collective action.
Central to this global understanding is the increasing harmonization of CSR standards and practices, facilitated by influential international frameworks. These frameworks, such as the UN Global Compact, the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), act as crucial catalysts, providing a common vocabulary and a set of shared expectations. This standardization enables greater consistency and comparability across diverse business landscapes, fostering a more level playing field for responsible corporate behaviour.
However, the international perspective also casts light on the persistent challenges hindering effective implementation. The vast differences in legal and cultural contexts, coupled with the sheer complexity of global supply chains, often lead to inconsistencies in CSR performance. The phenomenon known as the “race to the bottom,” where companies seek out regions with lenient regulations, underscores the urgent need for robust international cooperation and stronger enforcement mechanisms. This disparity highlights the necessity for a more unified and rigorous approach to ensure that CSR principles are universally upheld.
Moreover, the international dimension of CSR emphasizes the burgeoning importance of cross-border stakeholder engagement. Multinational corporations are now expected to actively engage with a wide array of stakeholders beyond their immediate operational boundaries. This includes fostering meaningful dialogues with local communities, collaborating with non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and partnering with international bodies to address pressing social and environmental concerns. This necessitates a deep understanding of cultural nuances and a genuine commitment to building trust and fostering open communication.[87] Companies must move beyond a “one-size-fits-all” approach and embrace culturally sensitive strategies that resonate with diverse stakeholder groups.
The surge in ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investing and the escalating demand for corporate transparency are further reshaping the international landscape of CSR.Investors are increasingly scrutinizing the social and environmental performance of companies, irrespective of their geographical location, driving a global convergence towards sustainable business practices. This trend is fuelled by the growing recognition that sustainable businesses are not only ethically sound but also financially resilient in the long term. Companies are therefore compelled to adopt rigorous reporting standards and demonstrate tangible progress in their sustainability efforts.
The digital age has also played a transformative role in shaping the international perspective of CSR. Social media platforms and online communication channels have empowered stakeholders to hold companies accountable for their actions, regardless of their geographical reach. This increased transparency has amplified the pressure on corporations to adopt responsible practices and address social and environmental concerns. The speed and reach of information dissemination have made it imperative for companies to maintain a consistent and credible CSR narrative across all their operations.
CHAPTER 4
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India marks a significant transition from voluntary philanthropic acts to a legally mandated obligation, primarily through the introduction of Section 135 within the Companies Act of 2013, signifying a profound shift in how businesses are expected to contribute to national development. This legislative move, coupled with subsequent amendments, emphasizes a commitment to enhance transparency, accountability, and the overall social impact of corporate endeavours. Instead of mere charitable gestures, Indian businesses are now legally bound to allocate a portion of their profits towards socially responsible initiatives, fostering a culture where corporate success is intertwined with societal well-being. These changes have prompted companies to actively engage in a diverse range of projects, aiming to address critical social, environmental, and economic challenges, thereby complementing governmental efforts in areas such as sanitation, skill development, and digital inclusion, while also aligning with global sustainability goals.[88]
Despite the notable progress achieved in integrating CSR into the corporate fabric of India, the landscape is not without its challenges.
Deficiencies in monitoring mechanisms, geographical disparities in resource allocation, and a shortage of specialized expertise continue to impede the full potential of CSR initiatives. The lack of robust monitoring frameworks often results in difficulties in accurately assessing the impact of CSR projects, leading to accountability issues. The concentration of CSR activities in urban areas, neglecting rural and remote regions, creates an uneven distribution of benefits, exacerbating existing inequalities.[89] Furthermore, the shortage of professionals with the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively plan, implement, and evaluate CSR projects hinders the efficiency and effectiveness of these initiatives[90].
To address these challenges and maximize the impact of CSR in India, it is imperative to implement several key strategies. Firstly, there is a need to establish robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to accurately track the progress and impact of CSR projects, ensuring accountability and transparency.[91] This involves developing standardized metrics and methodologies to assess the social and environmental outcomes of corporate initiatives. Secondly, it is crucial to promote equitable distribution of CSR resources, encouraging companies to prioritize projects in rural and remote regions, thereby addressing geographical disparities and ensuring that the benefits of CSR reach underserved communities. Thirdly, investing in capacity-building initiatives for CSR professionals is essential to enhance their expertise and ensure that they have the necessary skills to effectively plan, implement, and evaluate CSR projects.[92] This includes providing training and development programs on best practices in CSR, impact assessment, and stakeholder engagement.
Furthermore, fostering greater stakeholder engagement is crucial to ensure that CSR projects are aligned with the needs and priorities of local communities.[93] This involves establishing mechanisms for meaningful dialogue and collaboration with community members, civil society organizations, and other stakeholders. Enhancing transparency in the selection and implementation of CSR projects is also essential to build trust and ensure accountability.[94] This includes establishing clear and transparent criteria for project selection, disclosing information about project implementation, and providing opportunities for stakeholder feedback. Lastly, promoting greater collaboration between companies, government agencies, and civil society organizations can leverage the respective expertise and resources of these entities, leading to more effective and sustainable CSR outcomes.
In essence, the transformation of CSR in India from a voluntary to a mandatory practice represents a significant opportunity to align corporate goals with national development priorities.[95] However, to fully realize the potential of CSR, it is crucial to address the existing challenges and implement strategies that enhance transparency, accountability, and impact. By strengthening monitoring mechanisms, promoting equitable distribution of resources, investing in capacity-building, fostering stakeholder engagement, and enhancing transparency, India can create a more effective and sustainable CSR ecosystem, where businesses play a vital role in driving socio-economic development.[96] This will not only contribute to achieving national development goals but also enhance the reputation and long-term sustainability of Indian companies.[97]
4.1 Key Amendments
Over the years, the Indian government has introduced significant amendments to strengthen the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) framework and ensure that businesses contribute effectively to societal development. These changes have aimed at making CSR implementation more stringent, transparent, and impactful. Various amendments, including the Companies (Amendment) Act of 2019 and 2020, have shifted CSR obligations from a “comply or explain” model to a mandatory expenditure requirement, ensuring that companies fulfil their responsibilities rather than merely providing justifications for non-compliance. [98]Before these amendments, businesses could choose not to spend their CSR budget if they had a reasonable explanation. However, the legislative changes made it compulsory for organizations to allocate the specified amount to CSR activities, failing which the unspent funds must be transferred to a dedicated account and utilized within three years. If the funds remain unutilized, they must be redirected to government-designated funds such as PM CARES, Swachh Bharat Kosh, or the Clean Ganga Fund. These changes enhance corporate accountability and prevent companies from circumventing their CSR responsibilities, thus ensuring the intended social impact.[99]
Another crucial reform in CSR regulations came in 2021, requiring large firms that have spent at least ₹10 crores on CSR activities in the preceding three years to conduct impact assessments for projects involving expenditures of ₹1 crore or more. This regulation introduced a structured mechanism for evaluating the effectiveness of CSR initiatives. By assessing tangible outcomes, businesses can measure the real-world impact of their contributions[100]. For instance, a company supporting education programs would need to assess improvements in literacy rates, school enrolments, and employment opportunities arising from their initiatives. Such assessments ensure that CSR funds are not just allocated but also result in meaningful social or environmental improvements. Encouraging evidence-based decision-making, these assessments enable corporations to refine and enhance their future CSR programs, fostering a more data-driven and results-oriented approach.
To further regulate the usage of CSR funds, the government mandated that any unspent CSR amount must be deposited in a separate account within 30 days. Companies are required to utilize these funds within three years; otherwise, the amount must be transferred to a government-specified fund. This ensures that CSR budgets are used effectively within a stipulated timeframe and do not remain idle or get misappropriated for non-CSR purposes. This regulatory intervention prevents corporations from delaying or neglecting CSR projects and reinforces the commitment to timely social investments. By enforcing strict timelines for CSR expenditure, the government ensures that allocated funds contribute to immediate and ongoing developmental projects rather than remaining stagnant or misused.
Another significant amendment pertains to the treatment of financial surpluses generated from CSR activities. If a CSR project generates surplus revenue, such income cannot be added to the company’s profits[101]. Instead, organizations must reinvest this surplus into the same or another CSR initiative, deposit it into a designated CSR fund, or use it as per CSR regulations. This provision prevents businesses from profiting from CSR activities and ensures that any financial gains generated from social initiatives remain dedicated to furthering social welfare. This regulation ensures the integrity of CSR initiatives and guarantees that resources intended for social betterment are not redirected for commercial gains.
Additionally, the scope of CSR activities has been significantly broadened to allow businesses to contribute to various critical areas. The list of permissible CSR activities has been expanded to include disaster relief and management, particularly in response to crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. Companies can now allocate CSR funds towards healthcare infrastructure, vaccine distribution, and medical oxygen supply, helping to mitigate health crises. Furthermore, public healthcare and sanitation projects, including the construction of hospitals, medical research initiatives, and menstrual hygiene awareness campaigns, have been included under CSR activities. These inclusions reflect the government’s recognition of the importance of corporate participation in addressing pressing public health concerns.[102]
Moreover, the revised CSR regulations have also encompassed cultural heritage and sports development. Companies can now contribute to the preservation of historical sites, maintenance of museums, and promotion of traditional arts and crafts. Additionally, financial support for sports initiatives, including training programs and infrastructure development, is recognized as a valid CSR expenditure. This expansion acknowledges the role of cultural and sports development in national progress and encourages businesses to invest in these areas.
Environmental sustainability has also received significant emphasis under the expanded CSR scope. Companies can now undertake projects related to afforestation, water conservation, renewable energy adoption, and other sustainability measures. These initiatives align with global environmental goals and support India’s commitment to combating climate change.[103] By promoting ecological sustainability, businesses contribute to long-term environmental preservation while fulfilling their CSR obligations.
These comprehensive changes to CSR regulations mark a transformative shift in how businesses engage in social responsibility. By making CSR spending mandatory, ensuring proper fund utilization, mandating impact assessments, and expanding the scope of activities, the government has created a robust framework that holds corporations accountable while maximizing social impact. The amendments prevent tokenism in CSR activities and encourage businesses to approach social responsibility strategically and sustainably.[104] As a result, CSR in India has evolved from a voluntary philanthropic endeavour to an integral part of corporate governance and ethical business practices.[105]
In conclusion, the amendments introduced by the Indian government have significantly strengthened CSR implementation, ensuring that corporate contributions lead to meaningful societal benefits.[106] By enforcing mandatory CSR spending, regulating fund utilization, introducing impact assessments, and expanding the scope of activities, these reforms have created a structured and effective CSR ecosystem. These measures ensure that companies do not merely allocate funds for compliance but actively contribute to social and environmental betterment. As businesses continue to align their CSR strategies with national development goals, the impact of corporate contributions is expected to be more profound and sustainable, fostering inclusive growth and long-term societal progress.
4.1.1 CSR and the Clean Ganga Fund
Established in 2015 under the Indian Trusts Act of 1882, the Clean Ganga Fund (CGF) represents a Government of India initiative focused on gathering resources for the significant undertaking of revitalizing the Ganga River. This river carries immense physical, cultural, and spiritual importance for the nation. The CGF’s creation offers a specific channel for contributions from individuals, Non-Resident Indians (NRIs), Persons of Indian Origin (PIOs), Indian businesses, and international corporations towards the preservation and purification of this crucial waterway.
Acknowledging the considerable influence of the corporate world in national progress and ecological sustainability, the Indian government explicitly designated contributions to the Clean Ganga Fund as qualifying Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) activities. This inclusion falls under Section 135 and Schedule VII of the Companies Act of 2013. This strategic action aimed to direct corporate charitable giving and social responsibility efforts towards the critical necessity of restoring the Ganga.
The Companies Act of 2013 mandates that companies meeting particular financial benchmarks—a net worth of ₹500 crore or more, a turnover exceeding ₹1,000 crore, or a net profit of ₹5 crore or more in any fiscal year—must allocate a minimum of 2% of their average net profits from the preceding three years to CSR endeavours. Schedule VII of this legislation lists various eligible activities, including “ensuring environmental sustainability, ecological equilibrium, the protection of plant and animal life, animal welfare, agroforestry, the preservation of natural resources, and maintaining the quality of soil, air, and water.” It also specifically mentions “donations to the Clean Ganga Fund, established by the Central Government for the rejuvenation of the Ganga River.”
By clearly categorizing contributions to the CGF as a CSR activity, the government provided a well-defined pathway for companies to align their social responsibility commitments with a vital national environmental objective. This also presented businesses with an opportunity to participate in a cause of profound cultural significance[107] and to contribute to the well-being of communities reliant on the Ganga.[108]
The Clean Ganga Fund is managed by a Board of Trustees (BoT) headed by the Union Minister of Finance, with key government secretaries and officials serving as members. The Director General of the National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG) [109]holds the position of Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Trust. This structure is designed to ensure governmental oversight and accountability in how the funds are utilized.
The aims of the Clean Ganga Fund are extensive, covering diverse aspects of river restoration, such as:
- Providing financial support for projects identified within the Namami Gange program, an integrated initiative for river conservation[110].
- Coordinating and supervising the execution of approved projects.
- Receiving donations and contributions from a variety of sources.
- Formulating appropriate strategies to enhance the cleanliness of the Ganga River.
The illustrative list of activities eligible for CGF funding further clarifies the areas where corporate CSR contributions can be effectively applied:
- Management of diffuse pollution originating from agricultural runoff, open defecation, and livestock.
- Establishment of facilities for treating and disposing of waste along the river.
- Preservation of the river’s biodiversity and community-based initiatives aimed at reducing pollution.
- Development of public facilities, such as the renovation of ghats (riverfront steps).
- Research and development of innovative technologies for purifying the Ganga.
- Independent monitoring and real-time reporting for oversight.
- Planting trees along the riverbanks.
- On-site biological treatment of drainage.
- Any other activity approved by the Board of Trustees that aligns with the goals of the Namami Gange program.
Companies can contribute to the Clean Ganga Fund through various means, including direct monetary donations via channels like checks, electronic transfers, online payment systems, UPI, and even SBI ATMs. Alternatively, businesses can undertake specific projects that support the objectives of the Namami Gange program, such as adopting and improving ghats, piloting new environmental technologies, managing waste streams, conducting relevant research, raising public awareness, or engaging in afforestation efforts. Such projects necessitate approval from the NMCG following a thorough evaluation of the detailed proposals submitted by the companies.
The level of corporate contributions to the CGF under the CSR framework has varied over the years. While initial enthusiasm was notable, reports indicate fluctuations in the amount of CSR funds directed to the CGF. Some years saw substantial contributions, while others experienced a significant decrease. This variability could be attributed to several factors, including shifting priorities within corporations, perceptions regarding the impact of their contributions, and the availability of other appealing CSR opportunities.
Despite these fluctuations, the established framework allows companies to make significant contributions to the Clean Ganga Fund as part of their CSR responsibilities. The Fund presents a unique opportunity for the corporate sector to engage in a large-scale environmental endeavour with profound social and cultural implications. By aligning their CSR initiatives with the goals of the CGF and the Namami Gange program, companies can aid in the restoration of a vital national resource, enhance their corporate image, and demonstrate their dedication to sustainable development. Moreover, domestic donors to the CGF are eligible for a full (100%) income tax exemption under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act of 1961, providing a further incentive for contributions.[111] The Clean Ganga Fund remains a critical mechanism for involving the corporate sector in the long-term effort to restore the health and sanctity of the Ganga River.[112]
4.1.2 CSR and the Swachh Bharat Kosh
Launched in 2014, the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan (Clean India Mission) is a nationwide movement dedicated to achieving a clean and hygienic India. Recognizing the immense scale of this undertaking, which includes improving sanitation infrastructure, eradicating open defecation, and promoting hygiene awareness across the nation, the Government of India established the Swachh Bharat Kosh (SBK). The SBK was created to attract and direct Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds from the business sector, alongside donations from individuals and philanthropic organizations, towards the aims of the Swachh Bharat Mission.
The underlying reason for creating the Swachh Bharat Kosh was to supplement government funding and to utilize the resources and expertise of the private sector in achieving the ambitious targets of the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan.[113] The call to action by the Prime Minister on August 15, 2014, emphasized the need for a collective effort to make India clean by Gandhi Jayanti in 2019, with a specific focus on enhancing sanitation in both rural and urban areas, particularly within school environments.
To facilitate corporate involvement in this national mission, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, announced on October 24, 2014, the inclusion of activities related to the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan and contributions to the Swachh Bharat Kosh as eligible CSR activities under Schedule VII of the Companies Act of 2013. This meant that companies meeting the specified financial criteria were encouraged to allocate a portion of their mandatory CSR spending towards initiatives aligned with the Swachh Bharat Mission, including direct donations to the SBK.[114]
Schedule VII of the Companies Act of 2013 outlines a list of activities that qualify as CSR. This includes “promoting preventive healthcare and sanitation” and “ensuring the availability of safe drinking water.” By specifically including the Swachh Bharat Kosh, the government provided a clear and recognized avenue for companies to fulfil their CSR obligations while contributing to a high-priority national agenda.
The Swachh Bharat Kosh is intended as a mechanism for mobilizing resources beyond the government’s allocated budget. It enables companies to contribute to a central fund specifically dedicated to improving cleanliness and sanitation throughout India. The guidelines for the SBK highlight the channelling of charitable donations and CSR funds towards the construction of toilets in schools, rural areas, and urban centres, with the overarching goal of achieving nationwide cleanliness.
Companies and individuals can donate to the Swachh Bharat Kosh through various methods, including direct transfers to the designated bank account. The Kosh is managed to ensure that the funds are used for their intended purpose of enhancing sanitation infrastructure and promoting hygiene practices.
The inclusion of the Swachh Bharat Kosh under CSR has resulted in substantial contributions from the corporate sector over the years. Government data indicates that significant amounts have been received by the SBK as part of CSR activities since its inception. These funds have been vital in supporting the various components of the Swachh Bharat Mission, particularly the construction of toilets and the implementation of sanitation programs.
Companies engaging in CSR activities related to the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan have adopted a range of approaches. Some have made direct financial contributions to the Swachh Bharat Kosh, while others have undertaken specific projects on the ground, such as building toilets in schools and communities, conducting campaigns to raise hygiene awareness, and providing technical support for waste management systems.[115]
The impact of CSR contributions on the Swachh Bharat Mission has been considerable. The increased availability of funds, stemming from both direct government allocations and CSR contributions, has accelerated the construction of sanitation facilities across the country, playing a crucial role in the progress towards achieving an Open Defecation Free (ODF) India.[116]
However, the effectiveness of CSR in the sanitation sector extends beyond mere infrastructure development. Experts have emphasized the importance of addressing behavioural change and social norms to ensure the long-term use of sanitation facilities. While many companies have concentrated on the construction aspect, there is a growing understanding of the need for CSR initiatives to also focus on Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) activities to promote hygienic practices and the adoption of safe sanitation behaviours.
Sustainability is another vital aspect of CSR within the context of the Swachh Bharat Mission. Ensuring the long-term functionality of the infrastructure created requires attention to operation and maintenance.[117] CSR initiatives can contribute by supporting community-based systems for the upkeep of sanitation facilities and by promoting sustainable waste management practices.
Despite the significant interest and involvement from the corporate sector, challenges persist in maximizing the impact of CSR in the sanitation sector. These include ensuring the equitable distribution of CSR funds across different regions, addressing the specific needs of marginalized communities, and fostering effective collaboration among companies, government agencies, and non-governmental organizations.[118]
The Swachh Bharat Kosh serves as a significant mechanism for aligning corporate social responsibility with national development objectives. By offering a clear and recognized channel for contributions, it has facilitated the flow of corporate funds towards the critical goal of improving sanitation and hygiene in India. As the Swachh Bharat Mission continues to evolve, the role of CSR, both through contributions to the SBK and through direct local initiatives, will remain essential in sustaining the progress achieved and realizing a truly clean and healthy India. Emphasizing a comprehensive approach that includes infrastructure development, behavioural change, and sustainability will be key to unlocking the full potential of corporate social responsibility in this crucial sector.
4.1.3 CSR and PM CARES
The Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations Fund (PM CARES Fund) was established on March 27, 2020, as a public charitable trust to address the COVID-19 pandemic and other potential emergency or crisis situations. The fund’s main goal is to provide aid and support to those affected by such crises, including the development or improvement of healthcare infrastructure, funding relevant research, and offering financial assistance to the affected population.
Recognizing the urgency and scale of the challenges presented by the pandemic, the Government of India appealed to citizens and organizations, including the corporate sector, to make generous contributions to the PM CARES Fund. In a significant step to encourage corporate participation, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) clarified that donations to the PM CARES Fund would be considered eligible Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure under the Companies Act of 2013.
Specifically, the MCA, through various clarifications and circulars, stated that contributions to the PM CARES Fund fall under item number (viii) of Schedule VII of the Companies Act of 2013. This item includes “contribution to the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund or any other fund set up by the Central Government for socio-economic development and relief and welfare of the schedule castes, tribes, other backward classes, minorities and women.” Although PM CARES was founded with a broader aim of addressing any form of emergency, the government clarified its eligibility for CSR.
Furthermore, the MCA also clarified that using CSR funds for various COVID-19 related activities, such as promoting healthcare (including preventive care), sanitation, and disaster management, would also qualify as CSR expenditure under items (i) and (xii) of Schedule VII. [119]This provided companies with flexibility in directing their CSR efforts towards pandemic relief, either through direct donations to the PM CARES Fund or by undertaking specific activities on the ground that aligned with the fund’s objectives.[120]
The PM CARES Fund is chaired by the Prime Minister, with the Minister of Defence, Minister of Home Affairs, and Minister of Finance serving as ex-officio trustees. The fund operates solely on voluntary contributions from individuals and organizations and does not receive any budgetary support from the government. Donations to the PM CARES Fund are also eligible for a full (100%) exemption under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act of 1961, further incentivizing contributions. Additionally, the fund has received exemption under the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA), allowing it to accept donations from foreign individuals and entities.
The decision to include contributions to the PM CARES Fund as eligible CSR expenditure resulted in a significant outpouring of support from the corporate sector in India. Numerous companies, both public and private, contributed substantial amounts to the fund to support the government’s efforts in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. These contributions played a vital role in increasing the resources available for healthcare infrastructure, medical supplies, research and development, and providing aid to vulnerable populations.[121]
Many companies went beyond just financial contributions and also engaged in various other CSR activities to support the fight against COVID-19. These included manufacturing and distributing masks, hand sanitizers, and personal protective equipment (PPEs)[122], providing food and shelter to migrant workers and those in need, establishing quarantine centres and temporary hospitals, and supporting healthcare professionals[123]. The government acknowledged these efforts and clarified that such COVID-19 related expenditures would also be considered eligible CSR activities.
The PM CARES Fund’s structure as a public charitable trust allows for transparency and accountability in how the funds are managed and utilized. The trustees are responsible for fulfilling the trust’s objectives, managing contributions, and ensuring the proper use of the trust’s assets. The fund’s accounts are audited annually, and the financial statements are made publicly accessible.
The inclusion of PM CARES under CSR generated some discussions and debates among stakeholders. While many praised the move as a necessary step to mobilize resources during a critical time, some raised questions about its relationship with existing CSR frameworks and the potential overlap with other government relief funds. However, the government maintained that the PM CARES Fund was a specific initiative designed to address the unique challenges posed by the pandemic and other emergencies.
Over time, the PM CARES Fund has supported a wide array of initiatives across the country. These include the procurement of ventilators, oxygen concentrators, and other essential medical equipment, the establishment of PSA oxygen plants in hospitals, the funding of vaccine research and development, and the provision of financial assistance to the families of those who died due to COVID-19.[124] The contributions from the corporate sector, facilitated by the CSR eligibility, have been instrumental in enabling these interventions.
The concept of CSR has evolved to encompass not only philanthropic activities but also strategic initiatives that align with a company’s operations and contribute to sustainable development.[125] In the context of the PM CARES Fund, corporate contributions demonstrated a sense of national unity and a commitment to supporting the country during a crisis. It also highlighted the potential of CSR to be a powerful tool for addressing urgent societal needs.
Looking to the future, the PM CARES Fund continues to serve as a platform for channelling voluntary contributions towards emergency relief and assistance. The eligibility of contributions to the fund as CSR expenditure under the Companies Act provides a continuing avenue for corporate involvement in disaster preparedness and response. As India continues to strengthen its resilience against various types of emergencies, the role of CSR, supported by mechanisms like the PM CARES Fund, will remain crucial in fostering collaborative efforts between the government, the corporate sector, and the community.
4.2 Identification of Obstacles and Difficulties
Despite the enhancements in regulatory frameworks, the implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India continues to face several challenges. While the government has introduced stringent laws to ensure companies engage in meaningful CSR activities, various obstacles still hinder the effective execution of these initiatives. These challenges range from lack of awareness to inadequate monitoring and geographic disparities in CSR fund allocation. Addressing these issues is crucial to ensuring that CSR initiatives create a substantial and lasting social impact.
One of the primary challenges in CSR implementation is the lack of awareness and knowledge, particularly among small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Many of these businesses are not fully aware of CSR regulations, best practices, or the potential benefits of investing in social responsibility. Additionally, companies without dedicated CSR teams often struggle to identify impactful projects, measure their effectiveness, and handle funds appropriately. Without specialized knowledge and expertise, businesses may engage in CSR activities that do not yield tangible benefits. To overcome this issue, firms can invest in CSR training programs, hire full-time CSR professionals, and collabourate with NGOs and domain specialists who can guide them in designing and executing effective CSR projects. Enhancing awareness about CSR regulations and encouraging knowledge-sharing platforms can significantly improve the quality and impact of corporate social initiatives.
Another major challenge is the burden of compliance and bureaucratic red tape. Businesses, particularly smaller firms, often struggle to comply with stringent CSR laws, conduct impact analyses, and adhere to financial disclosure requirements.[126] The complexities of regulatory procedures make it difficult for many companies to implement CSR activities efficiently. Given the extensive paperwork and procedural hurdles involved, many firms perceive CSR compliance as a cumbersome obligation rather than a meaningful engagement. One potential solution is for the government to simplify CSR compliance procedures, particularly for small and medium enterprises, by introducing streamlined reporting mechanisms and reducing bureaucratic bottlenecks. Simplified compliance processes can encourage more businesses to participate in CSR initiatives without being deterred by legal complexities.
Geographic disparities in CSR expenditure also pose a significant challenge. A large portion of CSR funds is concentrated in urban centres and industrially developed states such as Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Karnataka.[127] As a result, rural and underdeveloped regions, including the North-East, tribal belts, and backward districts, receive comparatively less CSR support. This uneven distribution of CSR funds exacerbates socio-economic inequalities and limits the reach of corporate social initiatives. To address this issue, the government can introduce incentives for companies that invest in rural and underserved areas. By providing tax benefits, grants, or recognition for firms focusing on backward regions, businesses may be encouraged to extend their CSR activities to marginalized communities that require the most assistance.
Another pressing issue is the inadequacy of monitoring and accountability mechanisms in CSR implementation. Many companies treat CSR as a box-ticking exercise, prioritizing one-time donations and superficial contributions over sustainable, long-term projects. Additionally, some firms manipulate or exaggerate their CSR expenditures to comply with legal mandates without making meaningful contributions to social development.[128] To combat this, there is a need for tighter government audits, third-party assessments, and greater transparency in CSR reporting. Public disclosure of CSR expenditure, impact assessment reports, and independent verification mechanisms can enhance accountability and prevent misuse of funds. Stricter regulations can ensure that companies genuinely invest in impactful projects rather than engaging in symbolic gestures.
Limited stakeholder collaboration further hampers the effectiveness of CSR initiatives. Successful CSR implementation depends on the coordinated efforts of corporations, NGOs, local governments, and community stakeholders. However, many businesses operate in isolation, designing and executing CSR projects without actively involving beneficiary communities. This often results in poorly conceived projects that fail to address real community needs. To improve the effectiveness of CSR, companies should be encouraged to adopt participatory approaches, working closely with local governance bodies, NGOs, and the communities they seek to serve. Multi-stakeholder collaborations can facilitate knowledge sharing, enhance project relevance, and increase community ownership of CSR initiatives, leading to more sustainable and impactful outcomes.
Another significant concern is the tendency of companies to focus on short-term philanthropy rather than long-term sustainable impact. Many businesses engage in one-time charity events, donations, or relief efforts rather than investing in capacity-building programs that generate lasting socio-economic benefits. Sustainable CSR should prioritize areas such as education, employment generation, skill development, and infrastructure enhancement rather than merely providing temporary aid.[129] To shift from short-term philanthropy to long-term impact, CSR policies should emphasize projects that have measurable socio-economic outcomes. Companies should be encouraged to design programs that create self-sufficiency within communities, thereby ensuring continued benefits beyond the immediate intervention period.
Additionally, the complexity of CSR integration with core business operations remains a challenge for many companies. Some organizations treat CSR as an external obligation rather than integrating it into their broader business strategy. Effective CSR implementation requires aligning social initiatives with business objectives, ensuring that corporate resources and expertise contribute to long-term social progress. Businesses that successfully integrate CSR into their operations can create sustainable models that benefit both society and the company. Encouraging businesses to adopt a strategic approach to CSR by linking it with their industry expertise, supply chains, and market reach can enhance the overall effectiveness of corporate social initiatives.
Moreover, the issue of insufficient funding allocation for CSR remains prevalent. While large corporations have substantial budgets for CSR, smaller firms often struggle to allocate sufficient resources due to financial constraints. Many companies perceive CSR as an additional expense rather than an investment in social and economic development. To encourage greater participation, policymakers could introduce financial incentives, matching grants, or public-private partnership models that enable smaller companies to contribute meaningfully to CSR activities. Encouraging collaborative CSR funding models where multiple companies pool resources to address larger social issues can also enhance impact and efficiency.
Furthermore, measuring the effectiveness of CSR initiatives remains a critical challenge. Many companies lack the expertise and mechanisms to assess the social impact of their projects accurately. Without robust impact evaluation frameworks, businesses struggle to determine whether their CSR activities are achieving intended outcomes. Implementing standardized impact measurement tools and guidelines can help companies assess their CSR efforts more effectively.[130] Encouraging third-party evaluations and independent audits can provide businesses with valuable insights into their CSR performance, allowing them to refine their strategies for better results.[131]
The challenges in CSR implementation underscore the need for continuous improvement in regulatory frameworks, corporate policies, and collaborative efforts. Addressing these issues requires a multi-pronged approach that involves government intervention, corporate commitment, community participation, and enhanced transparency mechanisms. Strengthening awareness, simplifying compliance procedures, promoting geographic equity in CSR spending, enforcing accountability measures, encouraging stakeholder collaboration, and prioritizing long-term impact can collectively enhance the effectiveness of CSR initiatives in India.
In conclusion, while CSR in India has evolved significantly through regulatory reforms, numerous challenges continue to hinder its full potential. Companies must move beyond symbolic gestures and adopt strategic, sustainable, and accountable CSR practices that lead to meaningful social transformation. Government bodies, businesses, NGOs, and local communities must work together to address these challenges, ensuring that CSR efforts result in tangible and lasting benefits for society. By overcoming these obstacles, CSR in India can transition from a compliance-driven activity to a powerful instrument for social progress, fostering inclusive and sustainable development across the country.
4.3 National Priorities and Sustainability
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India aligns closely with the nation’s broader developmental goals, aiming to foster sustainable growth and inclusive progress. [132]Companies across various sectors have taken proactive steps to support government initiatives, ensuring that their contributions lead to long-term socio-economic benefits. By investing in critical areas such as education, healthcare, environmental sustainability, digital inclusion, and women empowerment, businesses are playing an essential role in driving national development. The alignment of CSR activities with national priorities ensures that corporate resources are directed toward impactful projects that enhance the quality of life for underserved communities and contribute to the overall progress of the country.
One of the key areas where CSR has a significant impact is education and skill development. Recognizing that education is the foundation of a progressive society, many firms allocate substantial resources to constructing schools, vocational training centres, and digital learning platforms. These initiatives aim to bridge the educational gap, particularly in rural and marginalized communities, where access to quality education remains a challenge.[133] Companies also offer scholarships and sponsorships for students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, enabling them to pursue higher education and professional training. Furthermore, the implementation of vocational training programs equips individuals with job-ready skills, enhancing their employability and facilitating economic independence. Many firms have also aligned their CSR efforts with the objectives of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which emphasizes inclusive, equitable, and technology-driven education. By supporting e-learning initiatives, companies are contributing to the modernization of India’s education system, ensuring that students have access to digital resources and innovative learning methodologies.
Another crucial domain of CSR intervention is healthcare and sanitation.[134] Companies have been actively involved in the construction of hospitals, clinics, and primary healthcare centres, particularly in remote and underserved regions. These healthcare facilities provide essential medical services, ensuring that communities have access to quality healthcare without financial constraints. Additionally, many CSR initiatives focus on maternal and child healthcare programs, addressing issues such as malnutrition, maternal mortality, and infant health. By funding immunization drives, prenatal care programs, and awareness campaigns on maternal health, businesses are making a tangible difference in reducing health disparities. Moreover, CSR efforts in sanitation are closely aligned with the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, a national campaign for clean water and sanitation. [135]Many companies contribute by setting up clean drinking water facilities, constructing toilets in schools and public spaces, and promoting hygiene awareness. These initiatives not only improve public health but also enhance the overall quality of life in rural and urban communities.
Environmental sustainability is another vital focus area for CSR in India. As the world grapples with climate change and environmental degradation, businesses are increasingly channeling their CSR resources toward eco-friendly initiatives. Many companies engage in large-scale tree plantation drives, promoting afforestation and biodiversity conservation. Additionally, firms are investing in clean energy projects such as solar and wind power, reducing their carbon footprint and promoting renewable energy adoption. Water conservation projects, including rainwater harvesting and watershed management, have also gained prominence under CSR activities. These initiatives help in replenishing groundwater levels, ensuring sustainable water resources for agriculture and daily consumption. Climate change mitigation efforts, such as promoting sustainable agricultural practices and reducing industrial pollution, further highlight the corporate sector’s commitment to environmental stewardship. By integrating environmental sustainability into their CSR strategies, companies contribute to the long-term ecological balance and resilience of the nation.
Another critical area where CSR initiatives are making a difference is digital inclusion and rural development. Recognizing the importance of digital literacy in today’s technologically driven world, many companies have launched programs to provide internet access, computer training, and digital skill development in rural areas. These initiatives empower individuals with the knowledge and resources needed to participate in the digital economy, bridging the gap between urban and rural communities. Moreover, CSR efforts extend to supporting small-scale farmers, rural entrepreneurs, and micro-businesses by providing them with financial literacy training, access to credit, and market linkages. Digital tools and platforms have been introduced to enhance agricultural productivity, improve supply chain efficiency, and facilitate e-commerce opportunities for rural enterprises. By investing in digital inclusion and rural development, businesses are contributing to economic empowerment and reducing socio-economic disparities between urban and rural populations.
Women empowerment and livelihood generation form another integral component of CSR activities in India. Companies recognize that gender equality and financial independence for women are crucial for holistic societal development. As a result, businesses have launched numerous initiatives supporting self-help groups (SHGs), microfinance programs, and women’s entrepreneurship ventures.[136] These programs provide women with financial resources, skills training, and mentorship opportunities, enabling them to establish and expand their businesses. CSR initiatives also focus on skill development for women, particularly in sectors such as textiles, handicrafts, and small-scale manufacturing, where female participation is high.[137] Additionally, companies support initiatives that promote workplace diversity, gender sensitization, and leadership opportunities for women in corporate environments. By fostering economic opportunities for women, CSR initiatives help in breaking gender barriers, enhancing women’s participation in the workforce, and ensuring their overall socio-economic advancement.
In addition to these primary focus areas, CSR initiatives in India have also extended to disaster relief, cultural heritage preservation, and sports development. Companies often step in during natural disasters, providing financial aid, rehabilitation support, and essential supplies to affected communities. By funding museum restoration projects, preserving historical monuments, and promoting traditional arts and crafts, businesses also contribute to the preservation of India’s rich cultural heritage. Furthermore, sports development initiatives, including sponsorships for athletes, infrastructure development for training centres, and grassroots-level programs, encourage youth participation in sports and physical fitness.
The impact of CSR initiatives in India is further amplified through public-private partnerships and collaborative efforts between corporations, government bodies, and civil society organizations. Many companies work closely with NGOs and community-based organizations to implement their CSR projects, ensuring that their interventions are tailored to local needs and have a meaningful impact. This collaborative approach fosters greater accountability, resource optimization, and community participation, resulting in sustainable and scalable solutions to societal challenges.[138]
Despite the progress made in CSR implementation, challenges remain. Issues such as unequal distribution of CSR funds, lack of awareness among small and medium enterprises (SMEs), bureaucratic hurdles, and inadequate monitoring mechanisms need to be addressed to maximize the effectiveness of CSR initiatives. However, with continuous policy support, corporate commitment, and stakeholder collaboration, CSR in India is poised to play a transformative role in the country’s socio-economic development.
In conclusion, CSR in India is deeply aligned with national objectives, ensuring sustainable development and inclusive growth. By focusing on key areas such as education, healthcare, environmental sustainability, digital inclusion, and women empowerment, businesses are contributing to the nation’s progress in a meaningful and strategic manner. The evolving CSR landscape, characterized by innovative solutions, long-term impact, and multi-stakeholder collaborations, highlights the potential of corporate responsibility in shaping a more equitable and prosperous society. As companies continue to integrate social responsibility into their business models, CSR will remain a powerful force in driving positive change and fostering a better future for all.
4.4 Effectiveness and Enforcement
The cornerstone of a robust Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) framework lies in its effective implementation and rigorous enforcement. Without these crucial components, even the most well-intentioned initiatives risk becoming mere gestures, failing to deliver tangible and lasting social and environmental impact. In the Indian context, where CSR has transitioned from voluntary action to mandatory compliance, ensuring effectiveness and enforcement is paramount to achieving the desired developmental outcomes.
- Strengthening Monitoring Mechanisms: Ensuring Accountability Through Impact Reporting and Third-Party Assessments
Central to effective enforcement is the establishment of robust monitoring mechanisms that provide a clear and accurate picture of CSR activities and their outcomes. The submission of annual CSR impact reports by companies is a fundamental step in this process.[139] These reports should not merely detail expenditures but also provide comprehensive assessments of the social and environmental impact of CSR projects. To ensure objectivity and credibility, these reports should be subject to third-party assessments. Independent evaluations, conducted by reputable organizations with expertise in social impact measurement, can provide an unbiased perspective on the effectiveness of CSR initiatives. These assessments should focus on evaluating the extent to which CSR projects have achieved their stated objectives, the quality of implementation, and the sustainability of their impact. They should also identify areas for improvement and provide recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of future CSR activities. The publication of these reports and assessments will foster transparency and accountability, enabling stakeholders to assess the performance of companies and hold them accountable for their CSR commitments.[140]
Furthermore, a comprehensive monitoring system should include regular site visits and on-the-ground assessments of CSR projects. These visits can provide valuable insights into the actual implementation of projects and their impact on beneficiaries. They can also help to identify any challenges or obstacles that may be hindering the effectiveness of CSR activities. The use of technology, such as remote sensing and data analytics, can further enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of monitoring efforts.
- Encouraging Public-Private Partnerships: Leveraging Synergies for Enhanced Efficiency and Reach
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) offer a powerful mechanism for enhancing the efficiency and reach of CSR initiatives. By combining the resources, expertise, and networks of corporations, NGOs, and government agencies, PPPs can create synergies that lead to more effective and sustainable outcomes. Corporate partners bring financial resources, management expertise, and technological capabilities, while NGOs provide on-the-ground knowledge, community networks, and experience in social development. Government agencies offer policy guidance, regulatory oversight, and access to public infrastructure. Collaborative efforts can lead to the development of innovative solutions to complex social and environmental challenges, and they can ensure that CSR initiatives are aligned with national development priorities.[141]
PPPs can enhance the efficiency of CSR projects by streamlining implementation processes, reducing duplication of efforts, and leveraging economies of scale. They can also expand the reach of CSR initiatives by tapping into the networks and resources of different stakeholders. For example, a partnership between a corporation and an NGO can enable the corporation to reach underserved communities that it may not be able to access on its own. Similarly, a partnership between a corporation and a government agency can facilitate the integration of CSR initiatives into broader development programs.[142]
To foster effective PPPs, it is essential to establish clear guidelines and frameworks for collaboration. This includes defining the roles and responsibilities of each partner, establishing mechanisms for communication and coordination, and developing systems for monitoring and evaluating the performance of PPPs. It is also important to ensure that PPPs are aligned with the principles of transparency, accountability, and equity.
Government Oversight and Compliance: Ensuring Adherence Through Regulatory Oversight and Penalties
Government oversight plays a crucial role in ensuring compliance with CSR regulations and promoting responsible corporate behaviour. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) in India is responsible for tracking CSR expenditure and ensuring that companies comply with the provisions of Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013. The MCA conducts regular audits and reviews of CSR reports and can impose penalties on companies that fail to comply with the regulations. These penalties can include fines and other sanctions, which serve as a deterrent against non-compliance.
In addition to regulatory oversight, the government can also promote compliance through incentives and recognition programs. For example, companies that demonstrate exceptional CSR performance can be recognized and rewarded through awards and certifications. This can encourage companies to go beyond the minimum requirements and adopt best practices in CSR. The government can also provide guidance and technical assistance to companies, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), to help them implement effective CSR programs.[143]
Furthermore, the government can play a proactive role in promoting CSR by integrating it into its own policies and programs. For example, government procurement policies can prioritize companies that demonstrate strong CSR performance. This can create a market incentive for companies to adopt responsible practices. The government can also promote CSR through public awareness campaigns and educational initiatives, highlighting the benefits of CSR for businesses and society.
- Use of Technology: Leveraging Innovation for Transparency and Efficiency
Technology offers powerful tools for enhancing the transparency, efficiency, and effectiveness of CSR initiatives. Artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and digital platforms can be used to track CSR expenditure, monitor project progress, and assess social impact. AI-powered analytics can be used to analyse large datasets and identify trends and patterns in CSR performance. Blockchain technology can enhance transparency and traceability in supply chains, ensuring that products are sourced ethically and sustainably. Digital platforms can facilitate communication and collaboration between stakeholders, enabling them to share information and best practices.
For example, AI can be used to analyse social media data and identify public perceptions of CSR initiatives. This can help companies to understand the impact of their CSR activities and make adjustments as needed. Blockchain can be used to track the flow of funds in CSR projects, ensuring that they are used for their intended purpose. Digital platforms can be used to create online marketplaces for CSR projects, connecting companies with NGOs and other implementing agencies.
The use of technology can also enhance the efficiency of CSR reporting. Digital platforms can be used to automate the collection and analysis of CSR data, reducing the administrative burden on companies. This can free up resources for companies to focus on implementing and improving their CSR programs.
However, it is important to ensure that the use of technology in CSR is ethical and responsible. This includes protecting data privacy, ensuring that AI algorithms are not biased, and making sure that digital platforms are accessible to all stakeholders.[144]
In conclusion, ensuring the effectiveness and enforcement of CSR initiatives requires a multi-faceted approach that combines robust monitoring mechanisms, strategic partnerships, government oversight, and the use of technology. By implementing these measures, India can maximize the impact of its CSR framework and contribute to a more sustainable and equitable future.
Chapter 5
Conclusion& SUgGESTIONs
5.1 CONCLUSION
Indian CSR has evolved into an organized, statutorily mandated mechanism for corporate giving back to society. The consolidation of monitoring, stakeholder engagement, and long-term project development will optimize CSR’s contribution to Indian sustainable development.
The journey of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in India, particularly since the enactment of Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, has been a transformative one[145]. It has ushered in a new era where businesses are not merely profit-driven entities but are increasingly recognized as integral stakeholders in the nation’s socio-economic development. This legislative mandate has successfully moved CSR from a voluntary, philanthropic endeavor to a structured, legally obligated framework, thereby fostering a culture of accountability and social consciousness within the corporate sector.
The examination of Section 135 shows its significant role in institutionalizing CSR, forcing qualifying companies to donate a percentage of their profits towards solving critical social and environmental issues. This change has led to a huge injection of corporate funds into different developmental areas, which has helped bring about positive results in education, healthcare, poverty reduction, and environmental conservation. The creation of CSR Committees, the development of CSR policies, and compliance with Schedule VII have given a formalized approach, and CSR initiatives have been aligned with national priorities and effectively implemented.
However, the journey is far from complete. While the legislation has achieved significant milestones, several challenges remain. The effectiveness of CSR initiatives hinges not only on financial allocation but also on strategic planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. The identification of credible implementing agencies, the need for robust impact assessment mechanisms, and the alignment of CSR activities with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are critical areas that require continuous attention.
Furthermore, the emphasis on local area preference, while commendable, necessitates a nuanced approach. Companies must strive to balance local needs with broader national priorities, ensuring that CSR initiatives contribute to holistic development. The need for capacity building among smaller companies and implementing agencies is also paramount. Many entities lack the expertise and resources to design and execute impactful CSR projects, hindering the overall effectiveness of the framework.
The interpretation of certain aspects of Section 135, such as “administrative overheads,” has led to ambiguities and inconsistencies. Clarifications and standardized guidelines are essential to ensure uniformity in implementation and prevent the misuse of CSR funds. The disclosure and reporting requirements, while enhancing transparency, can be further strengthened by incorporating standardized metrics for measuring social impact. This would enable stakeholders to assess the effectiveness of CSR initiatives more accurately and hold companies accountable.
The dynamic nature of social and environmental issues requires a dynamic CSR framework. The system has to be flexible enough to address new issues like climate change, technological upheavals, and changing social disparities. This means ongoing dialogue between the government, corporations, civil society groups, and other actors to make CSR programs responsive and relevant.
In culminating the exploration of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) within the Indian context, this research underscores a transformative journey, marked by a decisive shift from voluntary benevolence to legally mandated accountability. The evolution of CSR in India, as detailed in this study, reflects a broader global trend, yet it is uniquely shaped by the nation’s socio-economic fabric, regulatory landscape, and developmental aspirations. This transition, particularly the formalization of CSR through Section 135 of the Companies Act, 2013, signifies a pivotal moment, embedding social responsibility into the core of corporate governance and operational mandates.
The examination of the national legal framework, encompassing the Companies Act, 2013, and the Companies (CSR Policy) Rules, 2014, reveals a robust regulatory architecture designed to ensure that eligible corporations contribute meaningfully to societal advancement. The criteria for CSR applicability, the stipulations regarding CSR committee formation and responsibilities, the delineation of permissible CSR activities under Schedule VII, and the stringent expenditure and reporting requirements collectively establish a comprehensive compliance framework[146]. This framework aims to channel corporate resources towards addressing pressing social and environmental challenges, aligning business objectives with national development priorities. The analysis of these legal provisions highlights the government’s commitment to institutionalizing CSR, fostering a culture of responsible corporate citizenship, and leveraging corporate capabilities for sustainable development.
However, the efficacy of this legal framework is contingent upon its effective implementation and enforcement. The study acknowledges the challenges inherent in ensuring consistent compliance across diverse corporate entities and sectors. The complexities of monitoring and evaluating CSR initiatives, the potential for non-compliance or misallocation of funds, and the need for robust grievance mechanisms are among the key challenges that require continuous attention and improvement. Furthermore, the alignment of CSR activities with national priorities and sustainable development goals necessitates a nuanced understanding of local contexts and stakeholder needs. This underscores the importance of stakeholder engagement, impact assessments, and collaborative partnerships in enhancing the effectiveness of CSR initiatives.
The exploration of international conventions, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR),[147] the Multinational Enterprises (MNE) Declaration, the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, and Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development, provides a global perspective on CSR principles and practices. These international frameworks serve as guiding beacons, promoting ethical conduct, human rights protection, and sustainable development. They underscore the interconnectedness of global economies and the shared responsibility of businesses to contribute to a more just and equitable world. The integration of these international norms into national CSR practices is crucial for ensuring that Indian corporations operate in accordance with global best practices and contribute to the achievement of global sustainability goals.[148]
The analysis of recent developments, including amendments to the Companies Act and CSR rules, highlights the dynamic nature of CSR in India. The increased focus on impact assessment and reporting, the heightened scrutiny of CSR spending and compliance, and the promotion of sustainable and socially responsible business practices reflect a growing emphasis on accountability and transparency.The case studies of effective CSR initiatives illustrate the ability of corporate efforts to solve social, environmental, and economic problems, leading to sustainable development in India. Nevertheless, the research also points out challenges and challenges in implementing CSR, such as resource limitations, capacity issues, and the necessity for more effective monitoring and enforcement. Overcoming these challenges demands a multi-dimensional approach, encompassing cooperation among government agencies, companies, civil society groups, and other actors.
This mixed-methods approach allows for the triangulation of data and perspectives, enhancing the validity and reliability of the findings. The analysis of legal provisions, case studies, and quantitative data provides insights into the implementation and impact of CSR initiatives, while the interviews and literature review offer qualitative perspectives on the challenges and opportunities in the field.
Going forward, the future of CSR in India will depend on its capacity to evolve and keep pace with emerging challenges as well as to capture opportunities to drive positive impact. The growth in the adoption of digital technologies, the strengthening focus on circular economy principles, and the intensifying demand for sustainable products and services are some of the main trends that are redefining the future of CSR. The inclusion of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) factors in making investment decisions further accelerates the adoption of sustainable business practices. To ensure optimum success of CSR activities, businesses have to adopt a proactive and strategic mindset with a focus to integrate social and environmental aspects within core business processes. This includes adherence to improvement through continuous enhancement, stakeholder participation, and disclosure reporting. Independent directors within CSR committees as required by governance regulations showcase increased focus on ethics and responsibility in governance. Ensuring CSR strategies are more than symbolic steps rather than tokens to societal causes is their work. CSR board functionalities, such as strategic advisory services, monitoring and reporting on performances, and meeting with stakeholders, are also decisive for producing deep and enduring shifts.
In conclusion, this research underscores the transformative potential of CSR in India. By institutionalizing social responsibility, promoting ethical conduct, and fostering sustainable development, CSR can contribute to building a more just, equitable, and prosperous nation. The journey towards a more sustainable and responsible corporate landscape requires unwavering commitment, continuous learning, and a shared vision of a better future for all. Through collective effort and collaborative partnerships, we can harness the power of business to create a positive impact on society and the environment, ensuring that economic growth is aligned with social progress and ecological balance.
5.2 SUGGESTIONS
To solidify India’s position as a leader in corporate social responsibility (CSR) and to maximize its potential for driving social and environmental change, a suite of targeted recommendations is essential. These recommendations focus on strengthening existing frameworks, addressing gaps, and fostering a culture of impactful and sustainable CSR practices.
- Strengthening Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanisms- A fundamental aspect of enhancing the CSR framework lies in the fortification of monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. This necessitates the development of standardized metrics for measuring social impact, ensuring that CSR initiatives are assessed consistently and accurately. By establishing an independent body or mechanism dedicated to monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of CSR projects, accountability and transparency can be significantly enhanced. Encouraging companies to conduct regular impact assessments and publish detailed reports on the outcomes of their CSR activities will further promote transparency and provide stakeholders with valuable insights into the tangible results of corporate social investments.
- Capacity Building- is another critical area requiring attention. Providing training and resources to smaller companies and implementing agencies is essential for strengthening their ability to design and execute impactful CSR projects. Promoting partnerships between companies, academic institutions, and civil society organizations can facilitate knowledge sharing and capacity building, ensuring that CSR initiatives are informed by best practices and relevant expertise. The development of online platforms and resources, offering guidance and best practices on CSR implementation, can further support capacity building efforts and ensure that information is readily accessible to all stakeholders.
- Clarifying ambiguities and enhancing transparency– are crucial for fostering a clear and consistent understanding of the CSR framework. Issuing clear guidelines and clarifications on the interpretation of key provisions of Section 135, such as “administrative overheads,” will reduce confusion and ensure that CSR funds are utilized effectively. Mandating the use of standardized reporting formats will ensure consistency and comparability of CSR disclosures, enabling stakeholders to easily assess and compare the performance of different companies. Promoting the use of technology to enhance transparency and accessibility of CSR information, such as through online platforms and databases, will further empower stakeholders and promote accountability.
- Aligning CSR initiatives with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)– is essential for ensuring that corporate efforts contribute to national and global development priorities. Encouraging companies to align their CSR initiatives with the SDGs will promote a more strategic and impactful approach to CSR. Developing a national framework for aligning CSR with the SDGs, providing guidance and incentives for companies to contribute to specific targets, will further support this alignment. Promoting partnerships between companies and government agencies to address specific SDG targets will leverage the respective strengths and resources of both sectors, maximizing the impact of CSR initiatives.
- Promoting strategic partnership – for fostering collaboration and leveraging the collective expertise of different stakeholders. Facilitating partnerships between companies, government agencies, and civil society organizations will enable them to leverage their respective strengths and resources, maximizing the impact of CSR initiatives. Encouraging companies to engage in collaborative CSR initiatives that address complex social and environmental challenges will promote a more holistic and integrated approach to CSR. Establishing platforms for dialogue and collaboration between stakeholders will promote knowledge sharing and best practices, fostering a culture of continuous improvement.
- Incentivizing Innovation and Impact – Providing tax incentives and other benefits to companies that demonstrate innovative and impactful CSR initiatives will reward excellence and encourage further innovation. Recognizing and rewarding companies that achieve significant social and environmental outcomes through their CSR activities will further promote a culture of impact-driven CSR. Promoting the use of social impact bonds and other innovative financing mechanisms to support CSR projects will unlock new sources of funding and promote a more results-oriented approach to CSR.
- Strengthening CSR committees – is crucial for ensuring effective oversight and governance of CSR initiatives. Providing training and resources to CSR committee members will enhance their understanding of CSR principles and best practices, enabling them to effectively fulfil their responsibilities. Encouraging companies to include independent experts on their CSR committees will provide diverse perspectives and expertise, enhancing the quality of decision-making. Enhancing the role of CSR committees in monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness of CSR initiatives will further promote accountability and transparency.
- Fostering employee participation – is necessary for generating a social responsibility culture within organisations. Motivating organizations to bring employees on board in CSR activity will create feelings of ownership and accountability for the social impact. Giving employees avenues for volunteer opportunities in the service of donating their time and competencies towards aiding CSR activities will increase employee involvement and reinforce giving-back culture. Identifying and rewarding employees who take an active role in CSR initiatives will also encourage employee participation and foster a social responsibility culture.
- Addressing regional disparities – Encouraging companies to focus on addressing regional disparities and promoting inclusive growth in underserved areas will ensure that CSR efforts are targeted towards those who need them most. Providing incentives for companies to invest in CSR projects in backward and remote regions will further promote regional development and reduce inequality. Promoting partnerships between companies and local communities to address specific regional needs will ensure that CSR initiatives are relevant and responsive to local contexts.
- Promoting dissemination of Best Practices – Encouraging media coverage of CSR activities will raise public awareness and promote accountability, ensuring that companies are transparent about their social and environmental performance.
Indian CSR framework can be a strong driver of social and environmental change. India can further strengthen the impact of its CSR efforts and generate a more sustainable and just future if it addresses the challenges and adopts the suggestions mentioned above. The ongoing development of CSR in India demands a collaborative and multi-stakeholder framework to ensure that the government, businesses, and civil society engage to develop a positive and enduring influence.This collaborative spirit will ensure that CSR initiatives are aligned with national priorities, responsive to local needs, and contribute to a more just and sustainable society.[149]
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Statutes
1. Companies Act 2013
Books
- Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2014). Business and Society: Ethics, Sustainability, and Stakeholder Management. Cengage Learning.
- Crane, A., Matten, D., Glozer, S., & Spence, L. J. (2019). Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
- Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Parmar, B. L. (2018). The Cambridge Handbook of Stakeholder Theory. Cambridge University Press.
- Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. Wiley.
- Muchlinski, P. (2007). Multinational Enterprises and the Law. Oxford University Press.
- Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Wettstein, F. (2009). Multinational Corporations and Global Justice: Human Rights Obligations of a Quasi-Governmental Institution. Stanford University Press.
- Zerk, J. A. (2006). Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility: Limitations and Opportunities in International Law. Cambridge University Press.
Research Paper & Articles
- Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone Publishing.
- Kolk, A. (2016). “The Social Responsibility of International Business: From Ethics and the Environment to CSR and Sustainable Development.” Journal of World Business, 51(1).
- Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). “The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and Its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy.” Journal of Management Studies, 48(4).
- Binns, R. (2018). “Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy.” Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.
- Whelan, G., Partridge, K., & Davies, J. (2021). “CSR in the Digital Age: Challenges and Opportunities.” Journal of Business Ethics, 170(2).
- Carroll, A. B. (1991). “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders.” Business Horizons, 34(4).
- Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice.” International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1).
- Dahlsrud, A. (2008). “How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1).
- Friedman, M. (1970). “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits.” The New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970.
- Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). “Creating Shared Value.” Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2).
- Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory.” Journal of Business Ethics, 53.
- Jamali, D., & Mirshak, R. (2007). “Corporate Social Responsibility: Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Context.” Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3).
- Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). “Can Corporations be Citizens? Corporate Citizenship as a Metaphor for Business Participation in Society.” Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3).
- Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility.” Academy of Management Review, 33(2).
- Visser, W. (2006). “Revisiting Carroll’s CSR Pyramid: An African Perspective.” Corporate Citizenship in Developing Countries, 29(1).
Websites
- United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR).https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
- United Nations. (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf
- United Nations Global Compact. (2000). The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact.https://www.unglobalcompact.org/
- International Labour Organization (ILO). (2017). Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (MNE Declaration).https://www.ilo.org/
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. https://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/
- European Commission. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility, Responsible Business Conduct, and Business & Human Rights.https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/sustainability/corporate-social-responsibility_en
- World Economic Forum. (2020). The Future of Corporate Social Responsibility.https://www.weforum.org/
- KPMG. (2021). The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting. https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2021/09/the-kpmg-survey-of-sustainability-reporting.html
- PwC. (2020). ESG Reporting and the Future of Corporate Sustainability.https://www.pwc.com/
- McKinsey & Company. (2019). Profits with Purpose: How Corporate Social Responsibility Pays Off.https://www.mckinsey.com/
- Deloitte. (2021). Global Human Capital Trends: The Social Enterprise in a World Disrupted.https://www2.deloitte.com/
- Harvard Business School. (2020). CSR Strategy and Social Impact: Case Studies of Leading Companies.https://www.hbs.edu/
[1] Companies Act, 2013, s.135
[2] Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 (9.4.2), s. rule 2
[3] Ms. Ruchi Khandelwal and Ms. Swarna Bakshi, “The New CSR Regulation in India: The Way Forward” 1 Symbiosis Institute of Management Studies Annual Research Conference (SIMSARC13) (2014).
[4] Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
[5] Noor Talib, “Environmental Regulations and Corporate Legal Responsibilities in India” 8 International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 2024 Pages 83-89 (March 2024).
[6]Akanksha Jumde, “The Law on CSR in India: An Analysis of its Compliance by Companies through Corporate Disclosures” 1 Journal of Corporate Law Studies 2021 (September 1, 2021).
[7] Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. (2014). Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
[8] Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315-327.
[9] Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
[10] Supply chain responsibility is fast being regarded as a central facet of CSR. As global supply chains become increasingly connected and sophisticated, companies have an obligation to guarantee that their suppliers meet ethical and environmental standards.
[11] Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
[12] This trend is driving companies to improve their ESG reporting, adopt robust sustainability practices, and engage with investors on ESG issues
[13] Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The Circular Economy – A New Sustainability Paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768.
[14] John Doe, Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century (City: Business Press, 2020), 45.
[15] David Landes, The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present
(Cambridge: 1 Cambridge University Press, 1969)
[16] Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
[17] Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
[18] Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
[19] John Elkington, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business (Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers, 1997), 34.
[20] Forest Stewardship Council, FSC Principles and Criteria (Bonn: Forest Stewardship Council, 2015), 22
[21] George Serafeim, Integrated Reporting and ESG Disclosure (Boston: Harvard Business Review, 2015),
[22] Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), SASB Standards: A Guide for Investors (San Francisco: SASB, 2020), 8.
[23] Vogel, D. (2005). The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Brookings Institution Press.
[24] Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295.
[25] Larry Fink, 2020 Letter to CEOs: Purpose & Profit (New York: BlackRock, 2020)
[26] European Commission, Directive 2014/95/EU on Non-Financial Reporting (Brussels: European Union, 2014)
[27] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (Paris: OECD Publishing, 2011),
[28] International Labour Organization (ILO), ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Geneva: ILO, 1998)
[29] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, The Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 (New Delhi: Government of India, 2014)
[30]Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2013). Companies Act, 2013 – Section 135: Corporate Social Responsibility Provisions.
[31] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, The Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 (New Delhi: Government of India, 2014),
[32] KPMG, Corporate Social Responsibility and India’s Companies Act 2013 (New Delhi: KPMG India, 2014)
[33] European Commission, Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development (Brussels: European Commission, 2002),
[34] Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), GRI Standards: Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative, 2016), 15.
[35] International Labour Organization (ILO), International Labour Standards on Corporate Social Responsibility (Geneva: ILO, 2006), 22
[36] Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Setting New Agendas: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Developing World. International Affairs, 81(3), 499-513.
[37] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2013). Companies Act, 2013 – Section 135: Corporate Social Responsibility Provisions.
[38] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2013). Companies Act, 2013 – Section 135: Corporate Social Responsibility Provisions.
[39]The Companies Act, 2013, No. 18 of 2013, § 135, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India.
[40] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, The Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014
[41] Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. John Wiley & Sons.
[42] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2013). Companies Act, 2013 – Section 135: Corporate Social Responsibility Provisions.
[43] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2014). Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014.
[44] Refer to the Companies Act, 2013, Section 135, which outlines CSR provisions and Schedule VII for specific activities.
[45] See Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, General Circular No. 21/2014 for detailed interpretation of Schedule VII.
[46] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, General Circular No. 21/2014, dated 18 June 2014, which provides clarifications on the interpretation of Schedule VII.
[47] Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), Technical Guide on Accounting for Expenditure on Corporate Social Responsibility Activities, (2015).
[48] See Companies Act, 2013, Schedule 7 — which mandates disclosure of CSR spending and its impact.
[49] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2013). Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013 – CSR Activities.
[50] Refer to the Companies Act, 2013, S.135, which outlines the mandatory CSR requirements for eligible companies in India.
[51] Refer to Mahindra & Mahindra’s official sustainability reports for a detailed outline of their CSR vision and objectives.
[52] Read “Empowering Rural India: The ITC e-Choupal Story” for an in-depth analysis of the initiative’s impact.
[53] Reliance Industries’ official sustainability reports provide a detailed view of their CSR focus areas.
[54] Amnesty International, Corporate Accountability for Human Rights Abuses (2022), available at https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/corporate-accountability/ (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[55] United Nations, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (2011), available at https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[56] Clapham, Andrew. Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Oxford University Press, 2006.
[57] Wettstein, Florian. “CSR and the Debate on Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Great Divide.” Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 4, 2012, pp. 739–770.
[58] Ruggie, John G. Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. W. W. Norton & Company, 2013.
[59] United Nations Human Rights Council. “Improving Accountability and Access to Remedy for Victims of Business-Related Human Rights Abuse.” 2016.
[60] United Nations. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework. 2011. https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf
[61] United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
[62] European Parliament. Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights: Ethical Concerns and Policy Responses. 2020.
[63] Muchlinski, Peter. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. Oxford University Press, 2007.
[64] International Labour Organization (ILO). Tripartite Declaration of Principles concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy (MNE Declaration). 2017. https://www.ilo.org/empent/Publications/WCMS_094386/lang–en/index.htm
[65] International Labour Organization, Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, No. 87 (Geneva: ILO, 1948); Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, No. 98 (Geneva: ILO, 1949).
[66] International Labour Organization, Rules of the Game: A Brief Introduction to International Labour Standards, 4th ed. (Geneva: ILO, 2019), 12–15.
[67] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Negotiating Our Way Up: Collective Bargaining in a Changing World of Work (OECD Publishing, 2019), 30–35.
[68] United Nations, Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022 (New York: United Nations, 2022), Goal 8.
[69] International Labour Organization, Strengthening Social Dialogue for Sustainable Development (Geneva: ILO, 2017), 9–12.
[70] European Trade Union Institute, Capacity Building in Trade Unions and Employers’ Organizations (Brussels: ETUI, 2020), 19–23.
[71] International Labour Organization (ILO), Promoting Safe and Healthy Work Environments through Tripartite Dialogue (Geneva: ILO, 2018), 7–9.
[72] International Labour Organization (ILO), Transparency and Accountability in Business and CSR (Geneva: ILO, 2020), 5–8.
[73]International Labour Organization, Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy: A Global Review (Geneva: ILO, 2019), 45–48.
[74] International Labour Organization, Multinational Enterprises (MNE) Declaration: Challenges in Implementation (Geneva: ILO, 2021), 14–16.
[75] UNDP, Sustainable Business Practices: Strategies for Global Companies (New York: UNDP, 2019), 12–15.
[76]World Economic Forum (WEF),Corporate Governance and Accountability: Best Practices for Business Leadership (Geneva: WEF, 2020), 15–17.
[77]International Labour Organization (ILO),Guidelines on Fair Employment Practices (Geneva: ILO, 2017), 27–30.
[78]World Resources Institute (WRI), Business and the Environment: Creating a Sustainable Future (Washington, D.C.: WRI, 2019), 44–46.
[79]International Monetary Fund (IMF), Tax Integrity: Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy (Washington, D.C.: IMF, 2019), 50–52.
[80]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), National Contact Points and Their Role in Promoting Responsible Business (Paris: OECD, 2021), 19–21.
[81]United Nations Global Compact, The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact (New York: UN, 2020), 5–7.
[82]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Responsible Business Conduct: Strengthening the OECD Guidelines (Paris: OECD, 2022), 34–36.
[83]United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), The 2030 Agenda: A Holistic Framework for Sustainable Development (New York: UNDP, 2017), 6–9.
[84]United Nations, Leave No One Behind: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (New York: United Nations, 2016), 2–4.
[85] United Nations Development Programme, The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: A Global Commitment (New York: UNDP, 2016), 10–12.
[86] United Nations, The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023 (New York: United Nations, 2023), 12–15.
[87] Carroll, Archie B., and Kareem M. Shabana. “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research, and Practice.” International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 12, no. 1, 2010, pp. 85–105.
[88] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2013). Companies Act, 2013 – Section 135: Corporate Social Responsibility Provisions.
[89] Bansal, S., & Rai, S. (2021). Challenges in CSR Implementation in India: A Regional Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(3), 545-562.
[90]PwC India. (2020). Building CSR Capabilities: The Need for Professional Expertise in CSR Implementation.
[91] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2019). High-Level Committee Report on CSR Compliance and Impact Assessment.
[92] PwC India. (2020). Building CSR Capabilities: The Need for Professional Expertise in CSR Implementation.
[93] Bansal, S., & Rai, S. (2021). Challenges in CSR Implementation in India: A Regional Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(3), 545-562.
[94] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2019). High-Level Committee Report on CSR Compliance and Impact Assessment.
[95] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2020). CSR and Sustainable Development: Policy Framework and Implementation Challenges.
[96] PwC India. (2021). Strengthening CSR Governance for Sustainable Development.
[97] Bansal, S., & Rai, S. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility in India: Evolving Trends and Future Directions.
[98] The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019. Available at the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India.
[99] EY India. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolving Regulations and Best Practices.
[100] Deloitte India. (2021). Impact Assessment in CSR: A Strategic Approach to Measuring Outcomes.
[101] The Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Amendment Rules, 2021. Available at the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India.
[102] EY India. (2022). Expanding CSR Horizons: Strengthening Corporate Involvement in Health and Sanitation Projects.
[103] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2022). Corporate Contributions to Global Climate Action.
[104] Deloitte India. (2023). Sustainable Business Practices: The Role of Mandatory CSR in India.
[105] Confederation of Indian Industry (CII). (2023). CSR as a Pillar of Ethical Business Conduct in India.
[106] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2021). CSR Policy Rules (Amendment), 2021.
[107] National Mission for Clean Ganga. (2021). Government Initiatives for Ganga Rejuvenation.
[108] Press Information Bureau, Government of India. (2015). Corporate Participation in the Clean Ganga Fund.
[109] Ministry of Jal Shakti (MoJS). (2020). Namami Gange Programme: Implementation and Impact.
[110] National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG). (2019). Annual Report on River Ganga Conservation Efforts.
[111] Income Tax Department. (2021). Section 80G of the Income Tax Act: Tax Benefits for Donations to Clean Ganga Fund.
[112] World Bank Report. (2021). Corporate Engagement in Environmental Sustainability: The Case of the Clean Ganga Fund.
[113] Ministry of Finance (MoF). (2014). Swachh Bharat Kosh: Mobilizing Corporate Contributions for National Sanitation Goals.
[114] Government of India (GoI). (2015). Annual Report on Corporate Social Responsibility and Sanitation Initiatives
[115] Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA). (2018). Best Practices in Corporate Engagement for the Swachh Bharat Mission.
[116] Government of India (GoI). (2021). Sanitation Achievements and Future Roadmap for Open Defecation Free (ODF) India.
[117] Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA). (2019). Sustaining Sanitation Infrastructure: Challenges and Best Practices.
[118] Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). (2018). Collaborative Approaches to CSR in Sanitation and Hygiene.
[119] Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). (2021). CSR Policy Updates on COVID-19 Relief Measures.
[120] Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW). (2021). Guidelines on Corporate Support for Pandemic Relief.
[121] Press Information Bureau, Government of India, CSR Contributions to PM CARES Fund and COVID-19 Relief, 2021.
[122] NITI Aayog, Corporate Involvement in COVID-19 Relief Efforts, 2021.
[123] The Hindu Business Line, CSR and the COVID-19 Battle: How Firms are Helping the Healthcare Sector, 2020.
[124] PM CARES Fund, Annual Report on COVID-19 Expenditure, 2021.
[125] The Economic Times, How CSR is Shaping Corporate Strategies for Sustainable Development, 2022.
[126] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2021). “Clarifications on CSR Compliance Procedures.” Available at: www.mca.gov.in
[127] World Bank. (2021). “Ease of Doing Business and Corporate Social Responsibility: Reducing Bureaucratic Hurdles for Sustainable Growth.”
[128]Deloitte India. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility: Best Practices for Stakeholder Engagement.
[129]World Economic Forum. (2022). Rethinking Corporate Social Responsibility for Sustainable Development. Available at: www.weforum.org
[130]World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). (2022). Measuring Impact: A Guide to Effective CSR Assessment. Available at: www.wbcsd.org
[131]The Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Amendment Rules, 2021. Gazette of India. Available at: www.egazette.nic.in
[132] Ministry of Education, Government of India, National Education Policy 2020, available at https://www.education.gov.in/nep-2020 (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[133] MCA Circular No. 14/2021, CSR Implementation and Education Sector Contributions, clarifies that contributions toward education and skill development qualify as valid CSR expenditures under Schedule VII of the Companies Act, 2013.
[134] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Report on Corporate Social Responsibility: Impact and Best Practices (2021), available at https://www.mca.gov.in/csr-impact-report (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[135] Swachh Bharat Mission, Government of India, Swachh Bharat Abhiyan: Corporate Contributions and CSR Involvement (2021), available at https://swachhbharat.gov.in/csr-contributions (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[136] Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Microfinance and Women’s Economic Empowerment: CSR and Financial Inclusion (2021), available at https://www.rbi.org.in/microfinance-women-empowerment (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[137] Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, CSR and Women’s Skill Development: Best Practices (2021), available at https://www.msde.gov.in/csr-women-skills (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[138] FICCI, Public-Private Partnerships in CSR: A Model for Sustainable Development (2021), available at https://ficci.in/ppp-csr-model (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[139] Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) Framework (2021), available at https://www.sebi.gov.in/brsr-guidelines (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[140] World Bank, Corporate Social Responsibility: Enhancing Transparency and Accountability (2021), available at https://www.worldbank.org/csr-transparency (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[141] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) India, Aligning CSR with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) (2021), available at https://www.undp.org/india/csr-sdg-alignment (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[142] Planning Commission of India, Integrating CSR with National Development Programs: A Policy Perspective (2021), available at https://planningcommission.gov.in/csr-integration (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[143] Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI), CSR Implementation Support for SMEs (2023), available at https://ficci.in/csr-sme-support (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[144] World Economic Forum, AI, Data Privacy, and Inclusion in CSR Reporting (2023), available at https://www.weforum.org/csr-ai-ethics (last accessed 25 March 2025).
[145] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, “Companies Act, 2013,” Section 135
[146] Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, “Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014
[147] United Nations, “Universal Declaration of Human Rights,” 1948.
[148] United Nations, “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” 2015.
[149] Neethu M S and Alexander C, “Corporate Social Responsibility Towards Environmental Protection” 2 LegalOnus Law Journal (LLJ) (Year 2023).
